중도 지체장애학생의 교육과정 개발을 위한 생태학적 목록의 영역화 및 우선순위 = Ecological inventory territorialization and priority inventories to develop curricula for students with severe physical disabilities

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In general, curricula for the subjects of special education can be divided into development models, academic skill approaches, and functional curricula. Although these curricula have been traditionally applied to students for special education, there have been many studies that indicated these curricula were not suitable to students with severe disabilities. In this respect, this study is intended to suggest ecological approaches as a way to substitute or complement these curricula. Ecological approaches are designed to have the students prepared so that they can live as independently as possible in diverse present and future environments in the communities where they live. To this end, the skills necessary for each of the students to live in his/her home, school, and community shall be first selected and taught to them in actual environments.
The actions required to achieve this purpose have been established as follows: first, the ecological curricula areas for students with severe physical disabilities should be territorialized; second, the ecological inventories for students with severe physical disabilities shall be prioritized; third, the ecological inventory areas and priority inventories to develop curricula for students with severe physical disabilities should be presented. Participants in this study were 403 persons selected from teachers at schools for students with physical disabilities who have sound knowledge of the curricula for students with physical disabilities, parents, workers in organizations related with physical disabilities and adults with physical disabilities. The distribution of the participants by group was as follows; 110 teachers (27.3%), 110 parents (27.3%), 87 workers in organizations related with physical disabilities (21.6%), 96 adults with physical disabilities (23.8%). The tool used in this study was a questionnaire regarding the ecological inventory to develop curricula for students with severe physical disabilities consisting of 96 questions in four areas including leisure/entertainment (14 questions), housework/home (44 questions), community (21 questions), and occupation (17 questions). The questionnaires were distributed through e-mails, mail, and personal visits, and were collected in the same methods.
The data obtained in this study were processed using the SPSS 12.0 for Windows and the AMOS 7.0 programs. The results of this study are summarized as follows focusing on the contents of the study.
First, the ecological inventory areas to develop curricula for students with severe physical disabilities were indicated to be 18 inventories in the area of home/housework; 16 inventories in the area of occupation; 20 inventories in the area of community; 8 inventories in the area of hygiene; 11 inventories in the area of leisure; and 9 inventories in the area of safety.
Second, the priority inventories to develop curricula for students with severe physical disabilities by ecological inventory area, within each of the areas and for all the areas were as follows. First, the priority inventories by ecological inventory are were indicated to be hygiene; safety; ; leisure; community; and home/housework in this order of precedence.
Third, and in conclusion, the authors six ecological inventory areas to develop curricula for students with severe physical disabilities and also schematized and presented the priority inventories by ecological inventory area, within each of the areas and for all the areas thereby proposing a frame for developing curricula for students with severe physical disabilities.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

이 연구는 중도 지체장애학생의 교육과정 개발을 위해, 생태학적 목록을 영역화하고, 교수목표를 결정하기 위해 교육과정 참여자들을 대상으로 생태학적 목록의 우선순위를 분석하여 중도 지체장애학생 교육과정 구성을 위한 생태학적 목록을 제시하는 데 그 목적을 두었다. 이 연구의 참여자는 지체장애학교 교육과정 구성과 관련이 깊은 네 그룹 즉, 지체장애학교 교사, 학부모, 지체장애 관련 기관 종사자 및 성인 지체장애인으로 총 403명을 목적표집 방법에 의해 선정하였다. 연구 도구는 「중도 지체장애학생의 교육과정 개발을 위한 생태학적 목록에 관한 조사지」로서, ① 여가/오락(14문항), ② 가사/가정(44문항), ③ 지역사회(21문항), ④ 직업(17문항)의 4개 영역 96개 문항으로 구성하였다. 자료처리는 SPSS(v.12.0 for Windows)와 AMOS(v.7.0) 프로그램을 사용하였다. 결과적으로 중도 지체장애학생의 교육과정 개발을 위한 생태학적 목록의 영역과 우선순위는 위생 영역(8개), 안전 영역(9개), 직업 영역(16개), 여가 영역(11개), 지역사회 영역( 20개), 가정/가사 영역(18개) 순으로 나타났다. 또한, 생태학적 목록의 전체 우선순위는 ‘대소변 처리하기’, ‘몸의 청결 유지하기’, ‘화장실 사용하기’, ‘아프거나 다쳤을 때 어른에게 알리기’, ‘양치하기’, ‘세수하기’, ‘안전 규칙 지키기’, ‘응급/비상 상황에 대처하기’, ‘옷 입기/벗기’, ‘성적인 학대 피하기/알리기’ 등의 순으로 위생 영역과 안전 영역의 생태학적 목록의 우선순위가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 이 결과에 비추어 본다면, 중도 지체장애학생을 위한 교육과정을 개발할 때 위생 영역과 안전 영역에 대해 우선적으로 고려하는 것이 바람직하다고 하겠다.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목 차
• I. 서론 1
• 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
• 2. 연구 내용 4
• 3. 용어의 정의 5
• II. 이론적 배경 7
• 1. 중도 지체장애교육의 최근 동향 7
• 2. 생태학적 접근 13
• III. 방법 33
• 1. 참여자 33
• 2. 도구 35
• 3. 실시 절차 43
• 4. 자료 처리 44
• IV. 결과 45
• 1. 생태학적 목록의 영역화 45
• 2. 생태학적 목록의 우선순위 64
• 3. 중도 지체장애학생의 교육과정 개발을 위한 생태학적 목록 75
• V. 논의 80
• VI. 결론 84
• 참고문헌 87
• ABSTRACT 95
• 부록 99

참고문헌 (Reference)

1. 요인분석의 기초, 이순묵, 교육과학사, , 2006

2. 중복장애아동교육, 백은희, 구본권, 김삼섭, , 1994

3. 중증장애인. 2009. 2. 10, TASH, , 2009

4. 특수교육 연차보고서, 교육과학기술부, , 2011

5. 특수교육과 교과교육, 전병운, 교육과학사, , 2003

6. 지역사회 통합교육과정, 김동일, 이달엽, 박희찬, 지역사회통합교육과정, , 2004

7. Life skills instruction(2nd eds.), Patton, Wood, Cronin, , 1993

8. Rural Special Education Quarterly, Peckham-Hardin, Downing, , 2007

9. The ecological of human development, Bronfenbrenner, U., , 1979

10. Domestic Skills. In M. A. Falvey(Ed.), Falvey, Haney, Eshilian, , 1989

11. 특수학교 교육과정 해설(Ⅱ), 교육부, , 1999

12. Adaptive behavior assessment system-2nd, Harrison, Oakl, , 2003

13. 미래 사회와 교육과정의 구조, 김수천, 한국교육과정학회, "교육과정연구, , 2001

14. Honolulu: Department of Special Education, Hawaii Transition Project, , 1987

15. Twelve middle school teachers’ planning, Brown, Sardo-Brown, D., , 1988

16. Teaching students with severe disabilities, Westling, David L, Merrill, , 2000

17. Community living skills: A taxonomy Indiana, Dever, , 1988

18. AMOS를 이용한 구조방정식 모델 분석, 김원표, AMOS를 이용한 구조방정식 모델 분석, , 2006

19. Instruction of students with severe disabilities, Snell, Martha E, Merrill, , 1993

20. 肢體不自由兒の 「就學」と自己決定, 石渡和實, , 2000

21. Assessment of individuals with severe disabilities, Browder, , 1991

22. Curriculum: Foundations, Principles, Theory(2nd ed), Hunkins, Ornstein, "Curriculum: Foundations, , 1993

23. Severe handicapped students. An instructional design, Sailor, Guess, , 1983

24. 심리검사: 개발과 평가방법의 이해 제2판, 탁진국, 심리검사: 개발과 평가방법의 이해 제2판, , 2007

25. 2008년 장애인 실태조사(정책보고서 2009-16), 보건복지가족부, , 2008

26. The normalization priciple. In R. Flynn & K. Nitsch(Eds), Nirje, , 1980

27. 이론적 모형과 방법. 특수교육방법 및 전략, 김승국, , 1993

28. Descriptions of two novice secondary teachers’s planning, Brown, , 1993

29. Career education for handicapped indivisuals(2nd Eds.). Columbus, Brolin, Kokasaka, , 1985

30. Moderate and severe disabilities a foundational approach. 중도장애, 강경숙, 김미선, 이정은, Collins, , 2007

31. Life Centered Career Education: A Competency Based Approach(Fifth Eds.), Brolin, , 1997

32. Life centered career education(LCCE): Knowledge and Performance Battery, Brolin, , 1992

33. 중도장애학생을 위한 적합한 교육과정의 최선의 실제, 박승희, , 1997

34. Teaching Auxiliary Communication Skills to Severely Handicapped Students, Nietupski, Hamre-Nietupski, , 1979

35. The importance choice-making skills for students with severe disabilities, Klein, Shevin, , 1984

36. Systematic instruction of the moderately and severely handicapped(2nd ed.), Snell, , 1983

37. 重度重複障害？？育における敎育課程編成の現？と課題, 伊藤昭道, 重度重複障害??育における敎育課程編成の現?と課題, , 2006

38. Curricular and instructional approaches for persons with severe disabilities, Spooner, Cipani, , 1994

39. A Statewide Exploration of the Nature and Use of Curriculum in Special Education, Adams, Donna, Deanna, , 1995

40. 知的障害養護學校に在籍する運動障害を有する兒童への支援, 松原豊, , 2006

41. 중도·중복장애아동의 교육의 방향. 특수교육 정책포럼(pp. 3-13), 김삼섭, , 2002

42. Ecological versus developmental assessment: Influences on instructional expectations, Hwang, Linehan, Brady, , 1991

43. Inclusion and the law and placement decisions: Implications for school psychologists, Havey, , 1998

44. A functional curriculum for teaching students with disabilities: Self-care, motor skills, Beglin C, Valletutie, Bender, "A functional curriculum for teaching students with disabilities: Self-care, , 1996

45. Choosing Options and Accommodations for Children: A Guide to Planning Inclusive Education, Giangreco, Others, , 1993

46. Functional versus developmental assessment: Influences on instructional planning decisions, Brady, Linehan, , 1995

47. Attractor dimensions of behavior state changes among individuals with profound disabilities, Siegel-Causey, Guess, , 1995

48. Functional versus standardized assessment procedures: Implications for educational programming, Perino, Downing, , 1992

49. Concept and issues related to choice-making and autonomy among persons with severe disabilities, Guess, Benson, Siegel-Causey, , 1985

50. The Activities Catalog: An Alternative Curriculum for Youth and Adults with Severe Disabilities, Wilcox, Bellamy, , 1987

51. Individualized curriculum sequence and extended classroom models for learners who are deaf and blind, Helmstetter, Guess, , 1984

52. Educating students with severe disabilities: Enhancing the conversation between research and practice, Browder, , 1997

53. Educating children with multiple disabilities a trans disciplinary approach. Baltimore Maryland: Paul H, Orelove, , 1987

54. Students with severe disabilities: current perspectives and practices. 중도장애인의 교육과 재활, 김삼섭, Brimer, , 1990

55. Community-based curriculum: Instructional strategies for students with severe handicaps(2nd ed.). Baltimore: Paul H, Falvey, , 1989

56. A comprehensive guide to the activities catalog Alternative curriculum for youth and adults with severe disabilities, Bellamy, Wilcox, , 1987

57. 생활연령에 적합한 활동 선정이 장애학생에 대한 일반학생의 태도에 미치는 영향. 미간행, 홍정아, , 1995

58. 運動への制約を中心とした重複障害のある兒童生徒への敎育支援. 發達障害支援システム學?究, 上林宏文, , 2008

59. Life skills instruction for all students with special needs: A practical guide for integrating real-life content into the curriculum, Cronin, M. E, , 1993

60. A strategy for developing chronological age-appropriate and functional curricular content for severely handicapped adolescents and young adults, Gruenewald, , 1979

61. 중도장애아 교육 가능성에 대한 전반적 고찰. 제4회 이화특수교육 학술대회: 중도장애아 교육의 기초와 방법론(pp. 3-27), 이소현(SoHyun Lee), , 1997

62. Functional life skills, and friend/social relationship development: What do academic skillsparents of students with moderate/severe/profound disabilities value?, Nietupski, Strathe, Hamre-Nietupski, "Functional life skills, , 1992

63. Madison's alternative for zero exclusion : toward an integrated therapy model for teaching motor, tracking, and scanning skills to severely handicapped students, Nietupski, Brown, Hamre-Nietupski, "Madison's alternative for zero exclusion : toward an integrated therapy model for teaching motor, , 1976

64. 중도장애아를 위한 지역사회중심의 교수전략. 제4회 이화특수교육 학술대회: 중도장애아 교육의 기초와 방법론(pp. 79-101), Nandini,S., , 1997

65. 肢？不自由養護學校における 重度·重複障害生徒の移行支援ニ-ズへの對？の在り方 -進路指導と個別移行支援計劃の意義, 佐?木順二, 肢?不自由養護學校における 重度·重複障害生徒の移行支援ニ-ズへの'對?の在り方 -進路指導と個別移行支援計劃の意義-, , 2006

66. Ecological Inventories and Curriculum Development for Special Education in Developing Counties. Alternative Futures for the Education of Students with Severe Disabilities. 69-79, Baine, , 1987

67. 중도 지체장애학생을 위한 생태학적 교육과정 목록의 선정과 조직에 관한 고찰. 한국특수교육학회 2009 추계학술대회 자료집(pp. 293-314), 박은송, 김삼섭, , 2009

68. Interdisciplinary assessment and programming for multihandicapped students. In W. Sailor, B. Wilcox, &L. Brown (Eds.), Methods of instruction for severely handicapped students (pp. 3-46), Bricker, Campbell, "Interdisciplinary assessment and programming for multihandicapped students. In W. Sailor, , 1980