개성공단 생산품의 해외시장진출 확대방안 : 원산지규정 이슈 중심으로 = A Study on the expansive Inroads of Gaesung Complex Products into Foreign Market : The Issues on Rules of Oringin

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

North Korea facing severe economic deadlock is adopting limited market economy system partially so as to solve economic problem.
It is not expected that the way of reform and opening of economic system such progressive and partial reform and opening as in China will happen in North Korea considering the collapse of system in USSR and Eastern Europe in the early of 1990.
But it is expected that North Korea would reform economy and economic reform will be carried out continuously.
For this reason, the necessity and interest of industrial district in North Korea in which the direct investment can be made has been increased for the purpose of enlargement of exchange between North and South Korea and economy restoration through economic cooperation, strengthening of industry competitiveness for North and South Korea, balanced development of Korean Peninsula, and realization of economic hub of Korean Peninsula as a center of Northeastern Asia.
The Gaesung Industrial Complex project commenced on August 22, 2000 when Hyundai Asan and the North's Asia-Pacific Committee and the National Economic Cooperation Federation signed an agreement on the development.
The two Koreas have adopted agreements on customs, communications and quarantine relevant to the Gaesung Industrial Complex.
In 2005, Geaseong Industrial Complex is faced with not only having a sound system but also building up a market for products. It has merits such as a favorable location, cheap and skilled labor, and a tax favor. In the same time, it would be limited to produce and export because it is an industrial complex in North Korea.
Especially in the case of Geaseong Industrial Complex products being considered as a North Korean product, it would be limited to export. There is no international criterion of origin. Thus it is necessary to check a criterion of origin of major countries. Concerning that countries have different criteria of origin, the majority of Geaseong Industrial Complex products would be considered as a North Korean product. The reason is that companies in the Industrial Complex import raw materials from South Korea or third countries and produce goods in the site. If its products are considered as a North Korean product, it should be imposed higher tariffs than competing countries. North Korea is not a member of WTO, so cannot be granted MFN(Most Favored nation treatment).
It is also considered bilateral economic regulations. Particularly US is imposing the highest tariff rate of 'Column 2' on North Korean products and establishing import permission system.
Thus, North Korea should make efforts to improve tangled relation with U.S. not to lose biggest market in the world, and South Korea should lead North Korea to keep transition to an open society and market economy. and companies in Gaesung Industrial Complex have to find a favorable market for North Korean goods and have to develop marketing strategies for each product to fit for each market conditions.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제1장 서론 1
• 제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적 1
• 1. 연구의 배경 1
• 2. 연구의 목적 3
• 제2절 기존연구의 검토 5
• 1. 개성공단 5
• 2. 원산지규정 7
• 제3절 연구의 방법 및 구성 9
• 1. 연구의 방법 9
• 2. 논문의 구성 11
• 제2장 개성공단사업 추진현황과 의의 13
• 제1절 개성공단사업 추진현황 13
• 1. 개요 13
• 2. 추진과정 15
• 제2절 개성공단사업의 의의 18
• 1. 경제사업적 관점 19
• 2. 평화사업적 관점 20
• 제3장 주요 국가의 원산지 규정과 북한산 제품의 수출여건 21
• 제1절 아시아 (일본과 중국) 23
• 1. 일본 24
• 2. 중국 26
• 제2절 EU 28
• 1. 원산지규정 28
• 2. 북한산 제품의 수출여건 33
• 제3절 미국 34
• 1. 원산지규정 34
• 2. 북한산 제품의 수출여건 38
• 제4장 원산지규정을 중심으로 살펴본 개성공단 발전방안 42
• 제1절 한국산제품으로 인정받기 위한 방안 43
• 1. 국가별 원산지 관련 규정을 고려한 공정수행 44
• 2. FTA체결 시 개성공단 생산제품의 한국산 인정 47
• 3. 역외가공 규정을 이용한 수출 58
• 제2절 Made in DPRK, GaeSung 제품의 경쟁력 강화방안 59
• 1. 개성지역 브랜드 강화방안 59
• 2. 동남아시장 진출확대 64
• 3. 북한의 WTO 가입을 통한 정상교역국 지위확보 65
• 제5장 요약 및 결론 68
• 제1절 요약 및 결론 68
• 제2절 연구의 한계 및 향후 연구과제 70
• 참고문헌 71
• ABSTRACT 78