본 연구는 한국의 중소기업의 경영혁신과 성과를 직접적으로 유발하거나 매개하는 요인들을 조직의 내부와 외부환경의 구조 관계에서 총체적 시각으로 규명하고자 하였다. 본 연구에서는 ...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11825749
남원 : 서남대학교, 2009
2009
한국어
전북특별자치도
vi, 77 p. ; 26cm
0
상세조회0
다운로드본 연구는 한국의 중소기업의 경영혁신과 성과를 직접적으로 유발하거나 매개하는 요인들을 조직의 내부와 외부환경의 구조 관계에서 총체적 시각으로 규명하고자 하였다. 본 연구에서는 ...
본 연구는 한국의 중소기업의 경영혁신과 성과를 직접적으로 유발하거나 매개하는 요인들을 조직의 내부와 외부환경의 구조 관계에서 총체적 시각으로 규명하고자 하였다.
본 연구에서는 기업의 외부환경인 시장변동성, 시장매력도, 경쟁강도, 내부환경인 기업가정신 및 기업역량을 시장지향성과 기업성과에 접목되었을 더 큰 성과가 제시될 수 있음을 보여준다.
기업의 외부환경은 시장변동성, 시장매력도, 경쟁강도 그리고 기업가정신은 혁신성, 위험감수성, 진취성 그리고 본 연구에서는 사회적 책임을 고려하였다.
기업역량은 물적자원, 재무자원, 인적자원, 기술자원, 시장지향성은 고객지향성, 경쟁지향성, 부서간 협조 중심으로 살펴보았다. 그리고 기업성과는 비재무적 성과와 재무적 성과로 구분하였으며, 비재무적 성과는 내부프로세스 성과, 학습성장 성과, 고객 성과로 구분하여 살펴보았으며, 이러한 비재무적 성과는 재무적 성과에 영향을 미치는 요인으로 관계가 어떻게 형성되는지 제시할 수 있다.
본 연구의 주요결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다.
첫째, 외부환경과 시장지향성간의 관계를 검증한 결과, 시장변동성, 시장매력도, 경쟁강도가 높을수록 시장지향성이 높게 나타남을 알 수 있었다.
둘째, 내부환경인 기업가정신과 시장지향성간의관계를 검증한 결과, 혁신성, 진취성, 사회적 책임이 높을수록 시장지향성이 높게 나타남을 알 수 있었다.
셋째, 기업역량과 시장지향성간의 관계를 검증한 결과, 인적자원, 기술자원이 높을수록 시장지향성이 높게 나타남을 알 수 있었다.
넷째, 시장지향성과 비재무적 성과간의 관계를 검증한 결과, 시장지향성이 높을수록 내부프로세스 성과, 학습성장 성과, 고객 성과 모두 높게 나타남을 제시하고 있다.
마지막으로 비재무적 성과와 재무적 성과간의 관계를 검증한 결과, 비재무적 성과인 내부 프로세스 성과, 학습성장 성과, 고객 성과가 높을수록 재무적 성과가 높게 제시됨을 확인할 수 있었다.
이러한 연구결과는 중소기업의 경영성과를 이루는 각종 현상을 설명할 수 있도록 기존 이론들을 확장하여 적용할 수 있으며, 경영성과의 차이가 날 수 있음을 현상을 통해 분석하고 설명함으로써 중소기업의 경영개선과 불황극복을 위한 문제점 해결을 위한 이론적 분석 틀을 제시하고자 한다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
As the competitive market environment and industry circumstances become more and more competitive on a daily basis, it is not easy to find an opportunity to initiate small business, or increase performances of small business. It is a very uncertain bu...
As the competitive market environment and industry circumstances become more and more competitive on a daily basis, it is not easy to find an opportunity to initiate small business, or increase performances of small business.
It is a very uncertain business which requires strategy. So the role of environmental characteristics, market orientation is very important.
This study has focused on investigating the relationship among environmental characteristics(external environment: market volatility, market attractiveness, competitive intensity / internal environment: entrepreneurship, company competence), market orientation, and non-financial and financial performance of business performances.
The hypotheses were tested by distributing 400 questionaries to participants but only 284 responses were included for this analysis. The data was analyzed by using the SPSS Windows 14.0 and Amos 7.0.
The research findings are as follows.
First, external environment(market volatility, market attractiveness, competitive intensity) have significant effects on the market orientation.
Second, entrepreneurship(innovation, progressive, social responsibility) has significant effects on the market orientation.
Third, company competence(individual resource, technology resource) has significant effects on the market orientation.
Fourth, market orientation has significant effects on the non-financial performance(Internal process performance, learning & growth performance, customer performance).
Finally, non-financial performance(Internal process performance, learning & growth performance, customer performance) has significant effects on the financial performance.
The more competitive the small business are conscious of the actual environmental characteristics, the more sensitive the relations among market orientation, and performance of business are perceived.
The result of this research provides not only practical implication which shows environmental characteristics, market orientation, and business performances in the small business, but also theoretical implication of combining and reviewing through environmental characteristics, market orientation, and business performances.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1. Intrapreneuring, Pinchott, , 1985
2. Psychometric Theory, Pummer, Psychometric Theory, , 2000
3. The achieving society, McClell, D.C, , 1961
4. The Balanced Scorecard, Kaplan,R.S., , 1996
5. Mintzberg on Management, Mintzberg, , 1989
6. Defining Entrepreneurship, Lischeron, Cunningham, , 1991
7. Beyond Rational Management, R.E.Quinn, , 1988
8. When giants learn to dance, Kanter, Rosabeth Moss, Simon and Schuster, , 1989
9. Health Care Management, 5ed, Shortell, Arnold, "Health Care Management, , 2006
10. The Design of Organizations, Khandwalla, , 1977
1. Intrapreneuring, Pinchott, , 1985
2. Psychometric Theory, Pummer, Psychometric Theory, , 2000
3. The achieving society, McClell, D.C, , 1961
4. The Balanced Scorecard, Kaplan,R.S., , 1996
5. Mintzberg on Management, Mintzberg, , 1989
6. Defining Entrepreneurship, Lischeron, Cunningham, , 1991
7. Beyond Rational Management, R.E.Quinn, , 1988
8. When giants learn to dance, Kanter, Rosabeth Moss, Simon and Schuster, , 1989
9. Health Care Management, 5ed, Shortell, Arnold, "Health Care Management, , 2006
10. The Design of Organizations, Khandwalla, , 1977
11. Validation of apersonality index, Sexton, N.B.Bowman, , 1986
12. Theorizing about Entrepreneurship, Hofer, Bygrave, , 1991
13. Creating Corporate Entrepreneurship, Stopford, , 1994
14. Strategy Formulation in an Adhocracy, Mchugh, Mintzberg, , 1985
15. Empirically Defining the Entrepreneur, Stewart, J.W.Carland, , 1996
16. Designs for Corporate Entrepreneurship, Burgelman, , 1984
17. The Core Competences of theCorporation, Hamel, Prahalad, , 1991
18. Risk Taking Propensity of Entrepreneurs, Brockhaus, , 1980
19. Strategies of High Performance New Firms, Cooper, Wood, , 1986
20. Linking Corporate Entrepreneurship to Strategy, Dess, McGee, , 1999
21. Business Model: A Strategic Management Approach, Afuah, , 2004
22. On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models, Bagozzi, , 1988
23. Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences, S.Jaworski, Kohli, , 1993
24. International Social Action in Virtual Communities, Bagozzi, U.M.Dholakia, , 2002
25. TheEffectofaMarketOrientationonBusinessProfitability, Naver, , 1990
26. 마케팅 혁신이 기업성과에 미치는 영향, 홍성준, , 2005
27. A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior??, Covin, D.P.Slevin, , 1991
28. The Management of Resources and theResource of Management, Mahoney, , 1995
29. A Paradigm of Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Management, Carlos J.Jarillo, Stevenson, , 1990
30. The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three types of Firms, Miller, , 1983
31. LISREL 구조방정식모델이해,활용 및 프로그램밍, 배병렬, "LISREL 구조방정식모델이해, , 2006
32. A Nonfinancial Business Success versus FailurePrediction Model, Lussier, , 1995
33. An Integrative Model of The Corporate Entrepreneurship Process, Hornsby, R.V.Montagno, , 1993
34. Politics and Strategic Change Across Organizational Life cycles, Gray, S.S.Ariss, , 1985
35. A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs, Gilbert A.Churchill, , 2009
36. Strategy, Structure, CEO Personality andPerformance in Small Firms, Toulouse, Miller, "Strategy, , 1986
37. A Profile of New Venture Success and Failure in an Emerging Industry, Mintzberg, Row, W.B.Gartner, , 1990
38. Competitive Strategy:Techniques forAnalyzingIndustriesandCompetitors, Poter, Competitive Strategy: Techniques for AnalyzingIndustries and Competitors, , 1980
39. Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority, Day, , 1988
40. Reliability: A Review of psychometric basics andrecent marketing practices, Peter, Reliability: A Review of Psychometric Basics and RecentMarketing Practices, , 1979
41. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait- multimethod matrix, Campbell, D. T., , 1959
42. The development and testing of anorganizational-level entrepreneurship scale, Covin, Slevin, , 1988
43. Entrepreneurial Management: A Converging Theory for Large and Small Enterprises, Muzyka, Churchill, , 1994
44. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures, Bonnett, Bentlet, , 1980
45. Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness of fit indices for structural equation models, Gerbing, J.C.Anderson, , 1992
46. Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation, Construct and Linking It to Performance, Dess, Lumpkin, "Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation, , 1996
47. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two??step approach, Gerbing, Anderson, , 1988
48. The Evolutionof Strategic Simplicity : Exploring Two Models of OrganizationalAdaption, Korn, Miller, , 1996
49. The Antecedents andConsequences of Firm-Level Entrepreneurship: The State of the Field, Zahra, Kuratko, , 1999
50. The Effects of Entrepreneurial Proclivity and Market Orientation on Business Performance, A.?zsomer, Matsuno, T.Mentzer, , 2002
51. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implication for strategy formulation, Grant Robert M, , 1991
52. 조직구조, 회계정보 특성 및 관리통제시스템이 성과에 미치는 영향, 김강, "조직구조, , 2003
53. Juggling Entrepreneurial Style and Organizational Structure - How to Get Your Act Together, Covin, Slevin, , 1990
54. The Relation of Traits, Competencies, Motivation, Strategy,and Structure to Venture Growth, Baum, J. R., Baum, "The Relation of Traits, , 1995
55. 시장지향성과 성과: 사원만족, 고객만족, 기업이미지의 매개적 역할, 김영, 이학식, 이용기, "시장지향성과 성과: 사원만족, , 1998
56. Toward Reconciliation of the Definitional Issues in the Field of Corporate Entrepreneurship, J.J.Chrisman, Scharma, , 1999
57. Using theBalanced Scorecard as a Control System for Monitoring and RevisingCorporate Strategy, Narayanan, Campbell, , 2002
58. Organizing for Effective New Product Development; The Moderating Role of Product Innovativeness, Robert W.Ruekert, Olson, Orville C.Walker, , 1995
59. The proactive Personality Dispositionand Entrepreneurial Behavior Among Small Company Presidents, Maurer, Becherer.R, , 1999
60. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability:Implications for data aggregation and analysis, Blise, "Within-group Agreement, , 2000
61. 차별화전략, 유기적구조, 최고경영자 특성의 적합성이 조직성과에미치는 영향, 정재진, "차별화전략, , 2005
62. Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis, Covin, Zahra, , 1995
63. Governance Ownership, and Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Moderating Impact of Industry Technological Opportunities, Zahra, "Governance Ownership, , 1996
64. Guest Editors' Introduction to the Special Issue Strategic Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Strategies for Wealth Creation, R.D.Ireland, D.L.Sexton, Hitt, , 2001
65. PerceivedEnvironmental Turbulence and Its Effect on SelectedEntrepreneurship, Marketing, and Organizational Characteristicsin Industrial Firms, Allen Jeff, Davis Duane, "Perceived Environmental Turbulenceand Its Effect on Selected Entrepreneurship, , 1991