RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    高峯 奇大升의 性理說 硏究

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11791761

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Kobong Ki Dae-sung’s Theory of Moral Emotions and Feelings

    Nam, Ji-Man
    Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation
    East Asian Philosophy Division
    Dept. of Philosophy
    Korea University

    The aim of the present study is to demonstrate, in accordance with fundamental intention of Kobong Ki Dae-sung’s philosophy, the doctrine of Theory of Moral Emotions and Feelings(七情). Kobong's Theory of Moral Emotions and Feelings is output of Four Seven debate(四七論爭). In this debate, Kobong was a challenger to Toegye.
    Researches on Four Seven debate(四七論爭) so far attached too much importance to Toegye Yi hwang’s theory. The whole and true aspect of the debate is illustrated when the theory of Kobong is equally illuminated. Toegye argues that moral emotions are the only important and meaningful realization of Li(理). He insists that only the moral emotional beginnings(四端) is directly derived from the human nature(性), the substantiality of moral principle(Li, 理). Toegye's theory insists that feeings(七情)are derived from the emotional circumstances(氣) of the body.
    In his early doctrine, Kobong did not approve Toegye's thesis that feeling is derived from the emotional circumstances(氣) of the body. He insists that whole emotion and feeling is derived from the human nature, the substantiality of moral principle, so every emotion(Chiljung, 七情) is innocent and moral it self at beginning point. He emphasizes the innocent originality of human emotions. He thought that every feeling and emotion is the realization of Li. No one is seperated from the Moral origin, Li. In his view the Unverse is the exact realization of Li. He emphasized the realization of Li not Ki.

    Kobong debated with Sojae Ro Su-sin who arued that all emotional expression is the realization of Li. Contrary to this, Kobong's theory is that the origin and beginning point of all emotions is Li. So Kobong didn't approve that all emotional expression is the realization of Li. The good emotional expressions is the only the realization of Li. He worried that people could misunderstand the emotional circumstances of the body as moral origin itself, Li.
    In his view, the emotional circumstances is not the origin of morality but expressional moments that realize the morality. So people should distinguish the good expressional moments and bad expressional moments from the feeling.
    In his later theory Kobong approve that whole emotion is derived from the emotional circumstances of the body. Only the moral emotion is the secure realizations of the human nature, the substantiality of moral principle. He considered the Emotional circumstances of the body as the unsecure actuality of human nature. So every man should control his emotions to observe the moral rule and only the moral emotional beginnings can be believed to pursuit. So Kobong's later theory resembled Toegye's theory.
    번역하기

    Kobong Ki Dae-sung’s Theory of Moral Emotions and Feelings Nam, Ji-Man Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation East Asian Philosophy Division Dept. of Philosophy Korea University The aim of the present study is to demonstrate, in accordance with fundame...

    Kobong Ki Dae-sung’s Theory of Moral Emotions and Feelings

    Nam, Ji-Man
    Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation
    East Asian Philosophy Division
    Dept. of Philosophy
    Korea University

    The aim of the present study is to demonstrate, in accordance with fundamental intention of Kobong Ki Dae-sung’s philosophy, the doctrine of Theory of Moral Emotions and Feelings(七情). Kobong's Theory of Moral Emotions and Feelings is output of Four Seven debate(四七論爭). In this debate, Kobong was a challenger to Toegye.
    Researches on Four Seven debate(四七論爭) so far attached too much importance to Toegye Yi hwang’s theory. The whole and true aspect of the debate is illustrated when the theory of Kobong is equally illuminated. Toegye argues that moral emotions are the only important and meaningful realization of Li(理). He insists that only the moral emotional beginnings(四端) is directly derived from the human nature(性), the substantiality of moral principle(Li, 理). Toegye's theory insists that feeings(七情)are derived from the emotional circumstances(氣) of the body.
    In his early doctrine, Kobong did not approve Toegye's thesis that feeling is derived from the emotional circumstances(氣) of the body. He insists that whole emotion and feeling is derived from the human nature, the substantiality of moral principle, so every emotion(Chiljung, 七情) is innocent and moral it self at beginning point. He emphasizes the innocent originality of human emotions. He thought that every feeling and emotion is the realization of Li. No one is seperated from the Moral origin, Li. In his view the Unverse is the exact realization of Li. He emphasized the realization of Li not Ki.

    Kobong debated with Sojae Ro Su-sin who arued that all emotional expression is the realization of Li. Contrary to this, Kobong's theory is that the origin and beginning point of all emotions is Li. So Kobong didn't approve that all emotional expression is the realization of Li. The good emotional expressions is the only the realization of Li. He worried that people could misunderstand the emotional circumstances of the body as moral origin itself, Li.
    In his view, the emotional circumstances is not the origin of morality but expressional moments that realize the morality. So people should distinguish the good expressional moments and bad expressional moments from the feeling.
    In his later theory Kobong approve that whole emotion is derived from the emotional circumstances of the body. Only the moral emotion is the secure realizations of the human nature, the substantiality of moral principle. He considered the Emotional circumstances of the body as the unsecure actuality of human nature. So every man should control his emotions to observe the moral rule and only the moral emotional beginnings can be believed to pursuit. So Kobong's later theory resembled Toegye's theory.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼