RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    李能和의 道敎觀에 관한 硏究

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11776370

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      익산 : 원광대학교 동양학대학원, 2009

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(석사) -- 원광대학교 동양학대학원 , 동양학과 , 2009. 8

    • 발행연도

      2009

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 발행국(도시)

      전북특별자치도

    • 형태사항

      ii, 61 p. ; 26cm

    • 소장기관
      • 원광대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The times of Chosun Dynasty is applied as dynamic period in all aspects of religion, politics, ideology, and culture. In particular, the period which Lee, Nung-Hwa(1869-1943) was active promoted the introduction of various western civilization as a practical scientific correspond to thinking method of Neo-Confucian, and social culture challenged big change. At that time, the publication of [Chosun Taoistic History] by Lee, Nung-Hwa had a significant meaning.

    He intended to make the relationship between Taoistic ideology and Chosun Dynasty to cohere and further insisted that Korea was the origin country of Taoism through the facts that the letter 'Gun(Lord)' of Dangun is the term of Seonga(Taoist Hermit Community), Samseon Mt.(Three gods Mt.) was Taebaek Mt., Shi Xu(徐市) and Zhong Han(韓終) of Qin Dynasty who were Bangsa(方士, Taoistic wizards) come to Korea to find the medicine of immortality, and Liang Zhang(張良) took Changhae Bangsa(滄海方士) to kill First Qin Emperor.

    His view of Taoism which is indicated to [Chosun Taoistic History] should be understood in the aspect to intend to find patriotic independent identity. Let's search it more further, and as first, he prepared the opportunity to make the identity of our people more strongly through [Chosun Taoistic History]. That is, though we cannot consent to the insist of him that Taoism country was the very Korea, independence which he insisted is most urgently needed part in nowadays.

    Second, there may be criticism to the fact that he used the terms Taoism and Taoist without dividing. However, because we cannot regard Lee, Nung-Hwa who widely studied so many data as low class scholar due to having only few errors, the viewpoints of researchers have emphasized great points of his works. Therefore, we should consider the possibility that division of Taoism with Taoist was not such an important matter to him. If we take a broad view, we can understand both of Taoist as an ideology and Taoism as a religion in the rule of Taoism. Because Taoism which was a private religion of China had equipped system only after the commencing of religious body, the role as Taoist was the thing of further next generation. It means that if we go back to its origin, the dividing of Taoism with Taoist is not significant matter.

    Third, in his lifetime, that period was most painful one in our people's history. That time was that Chosun Dynasty was collapsed and Japanese Colonial Period was started. We should see the efforts of him to awaken the people spirit through many of writing works.
    번역하기

    The times of Chosun Dynasty is applied as dynamic period in all aspects of religion, politics, ideology, and culture. In particular, the period which Lee, Nung-Hwa(1869-1943) was active promoted the introduction of various western civilization as a pr...

    The times of Chosun Dynasty is applied as dynamic period in all aspects of religion, politics, ideology, and culture. In particular, the period which Lee, Nung-Hwa(1869-1943) was active promoted the introduction of various western civilization as a practical scientific correspond to thinking method of Neo-Confucian, and social culture challenged big change. At that time, the publication of [Chosun Taoistic History] by Lee, Nung-Hwa had a significant meaning.

    He intended to make the relationship between Taoistic ideology and Chosun Dynasty to cohere and further insisted that Korea was the origin country of Taoism through the facts that the letter 'Gun(Lord)' of Dangun is the term of Seonga(Taoist Hermit Community), Samseon Mt.(Three gods Mt.) was Taebaek Mt., Shi Xu(徐市) and Zhong Han(韓終) of Qin Dynasty who were Bangsa(方士, Taoistic wizards) come to Korea to find the medicine of immortality, and Liang Zhang(張良) took Changhae Bangsa(滄海方士) to kill First Qin Emperor.

    His view of Taoism which is indicated to [Chosun Taoistic History] should be understood in the aspect to intend to find patriotic independent identity. Let's search it more further, and as first, he prepared the opportunity to make the identity of our people more strongly through [Chosun Taoistic History]. That is, though we cannot consent to the insist of him that Taoism country was the very Korea, independence which he insisted is most urgently needed part in nowadays.

    Second, there may be criticism to the fact that he used the terms Taoism and Taoist without dividing. However, because we cannot regard Lee, Nung-Hwa who widely studied so many data as low class scholar due to having only few errors, the viewpoints of researchers have emphasized great points of his works. Therefore, we should consider the possibility that division of Taoism with Taoist was not such an important matter to him. If we take a broad view, we can understand both of Taoist as an ideology and Taoism as a religion in the rule of Taoism. Because Taoism which was a private religion of China had equipped system only after the commencing of religious body, the role as Taoist was the thing of further next generation. It means that if we go back to its origin, the dividing of Taoism with Taoist is not significant matter.

    Third, in his lifetime, that period was most painful one in our people's history. That time was that Chosun Dynasty was collapsed and Japanese Colonial Period was started. We should see the efforts of him to awaken the people spirit through many of writing works.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 序論 1
    • 1. 硏究의 目的 1
    • 2. 先行硏究分析 2
    • 3. 硏究의 方法 5
    • Ⅱ. 李能和의 生涯와 思想的背景 8
    • Ⅰ. 序論 1
    • 1. 硏究의 目的 1
    • 2. 先行硏究分析 2
    • 3. 硏究의 方法 5
    • Ⅱ. 李能和의 生涯와 思想的背景 8
    • 1. 生涯와 著述 8
    • 2. 朝鮮後期 道敎思想의 展開 16
    • Ⅲ. ??朝鮮道敎史??의 構造와 內容 23
    • 1. ??朝鮮道敎史??의 形成背景 23
    • 2. ??朝鮮道敎史??의 構成과 內容 28
    • Ⅳ. 李能和의 道敎觀 46
    • Ⅴ. 結論 53
    • 參考文獻 56
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼