군 부적응 사병과 일반사병의 충동성과 스트레스 대처방식, 사회성의 차이에 관한 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study is interested in soldiers who even though didn't have mental illness
before enlistment and intelligence problem but after enlistment couldn't be
adapted to military and showed various problems, and their psychological
differences between individuals. And designed to research differences with
normal soldiers who relatively adapted to military well in terms of an impulse,
a sociality and dealing stress. This study prescribes a soldiers who attended
military adaptation because of the command stress of their officer and were
requested to a mental health consultation organization as military maladjustment
group, and also prescribes exemplary soldiers who dispatched to manage
military maladjustment group as normal soldiers.
In intelligence function, K-WAIS' silverstein shorten form(V-BD) was used to
calibrate maladjustment soldiers' intelligence, an impulse and dealing stress
were calibrated by the medium of BIS-11 and The Ways of Coping Checklist.
Sociality was judged in application of part of SASS.
Independent t-test was used to recognize difference between two groups, the
result is as flows.
First, military maladjustment group had higher impulse than general private
- v -
soldier, but among subfactors, there was meaningful difference in motion
impulse and unplanned impulse. Namely, military maladjustment group was
considered as had hardship in adaptation because they had higher impulse
propensity. As stress rose, they acted planlessly and couldn't control
themselves.
Second, general private soldier group's dealing stress ability was showed
better than military maladjustment group, normal soldier group had meaningful
difference in passive dealing and active dealing. This result suggested that
military maladjustment group had higher possibility of experiencing negative
emotion like hypochondria and negative ego scheme.
Third, There were no sociality difference between military maladjustment group
and general private soldier group, but this result was believed to be excessive
subordinate equalization because in this research, there was inappropriate
standard in judging sociality among military maladjustment group who didn't
have mental pathology. Actually it was believed to there was difference of
sociality between military maladjustment group and normal soldier group,
because passive dealing influenced by relationship stress and dealing ability with
relationship stress were regarded also higher in general private soldier group.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서 론 ··················································································································· 1
• 1. 연구의 필요성 ··································································································· 1
• 2. 이론적 배경 ······································································································· 2
• 1) 적응장애의 개념과 진단적 준거 ······························································· 2
• 2) 적응장애의 원인과 경과 ············································································· 5
• 3) 군 조직과 관련된 스트레스 요인 ····························································· 7
• 4) 군 부적응과 관련된 심리적, 정신의학적 요인들 ·································· 8
• (1) 군 부적응과 충동성향 ············································································ 9
• (2) 군 부적응과 스트레스 대처방식 ························································ 10
• (3) 군부적응과 사회성 ················································································ 13
• 3. 연구가설 ··········································································································· 15
• Ⅱ. 연구 방법 ········································································································ 17
• 1. 연구대상 ··········································································································· 17
• 2. 측정도구 ··········································································································· 17
• 1) K-WAIS의 Silverstein 단축방식(V-BD형) ········································· 17
• 2) 충동성 검사(Barret Impulsiveness Scale 11판; BIS -11) ··············· 17
• 3) 스트레스 대처방식 척도 ··········································································· 18
• 4) 사회적응 자기평가 척도(Social Adaptation Self-rating scale) ······ 18
• Ⅲ. 결 과 ················································································································· 19
• 1. 연구 대상의 일반적 특성과 군 부적응 사병들의 부적응 사유 및
• 지능수준 ··········································································································· 19
• - ii -
• 2. 충동성향의 차이 비교 ··················································································· 21
• 3. 스트레스 대처방식의 차이 ··········································································· 21
• 4. 사회성의 차이 ································································································· 23
• Ⅳ. 논 의 ················································································································· 24
• Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론 ································································································· 28
• 참고문헌 ··················································································································· 30
• 부록 ···························································································································· 35
• <일반적인 사항> ································································································ 35
• 사회성 척도(SASS) ···························································································· 36
• 스트레스 대처방식 ······························································································ 37
• 한국판 충동성 척도 (BIS-11) ·········································································· 41