건강한 가족을 위한 프로그램 요구도에 관한 연구 : 칠곡군을 중심으로 = A Study of the Degree of Demand for Programs for Healthy Family

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

(Abstract)

The research is targeted to local resident citizens in searching for family healthiness standard and conjugal relationship standard. And the goal is to lay out constructive direction. The research period was 62 days (2008.12.1~2009.1.31) and the participants were local citizens of Chilgok-gun, Gyeongsangbuk-do. The research survey was made out by Chilgok-gun citizens who had visited the Healthy Family-Support Center of Chilgo-gun’s eight eupmun The gathered data were analyzed through SPSS/PC for Windows 12.0, and the Chronback’s α which verifies internal accordance was measured for reliability verification of each measurement tool. The frequency and percentage were yield by Frequency Analysis, which were implemented to seek general characteristics of survey participants. The factors which differed from the general characteristic were chi-square analyzed and with no difference factor, used Frequency Analysis in finding the degree of demand for Healthy Family-Support Center. Also, the average and percentage were found to seek the degree of difference in family healthiness and marriage relation t-test and ANOVA verification where implemented to find the difference of social- demographic characteristics, and Scheffe-test edusing post-hocanalysis method for factors showing difference in ANOVA. The research results found in this study are as following. First of all, survey participants perceived family living through family healthiness showed the average of 3.5379 (standard deviation 0.5931), Family healthiness difference in social-demographic variable by gender, age, health status, marriage statue existed. Precisely, married female in their 40s, positive health status, gross income more than 3 million won survey participants perceived highest in family healthiness. The perceived marriage relation by survey participants showed high relation, above 57.7% withholding 177 people. Normal data were 40.4%, containing 124 people and low 2.0% with 6 people, showing perceived marriage relation to be good in local resident couples
Second of all, when the subordinate factor were prior counseling for perceived degree, counseling, leisure time activity, priority in participating education program, priority in participating culture program, and family problem prevention and solving of the survey participants demand of degree of Healthy Family-Support Center showed the perceived degree showed 52.5% of high score that most them ‘already know’. gross income. Also, participants who have previous experience in attending the program illustrated the culture program, containing family movie festival, family volunteer, family harmony day participation were highest, followed by education program such as parent education, married couple education, old age education, and family living education, and the counseling program participation apperared relatively low. In counseling troubles and difficulties, the main consultants appeared to be mostly ‘the wife or husband’, followed by ‘friend or lovers’, ‘individual solving’, ‘parent’, ‘brothers and sisters’, ‘relative or friend’, ‘specialized institution’, ‘religious person’, etc order. The most appropriate counseling type appeared to be ‘interview counseling’, in order to ‘telephone counseling’, ‘cyber counseling’ and etc. The participants’ leisure activity can be divided into the most frequent leisure activity with family and wanted leisure activity with their family. The former showed highest in ‘housework’ and the later ‘family travel’. So to speak, the survey participants used their leisure time doing housework, but the wanted leisure activity showed to be family travel.
We have searched the priority order results by dividing the participating demanded programs by survey participants that enhances family healthiness and happiness into education program and culture program. In the educational program, the degree of demand were topped by ‘parent education for adolescence children’, followed in the order of ‘married couple communication education’, ‘parent education for infancy children’, ‘old aging preparation education’, ‘marriage preparation education’, and ‘parent-to-be education’. The top priority in culture program was ‘family travel’, followed by the demand for ‘family volunteer’, ‘culture experience’, ‘married couple movie dating’, ‘family movie festival’, and ‘family camp’. The demand for counseling by survey participants in preventing and solving family problems top priority was ‘children breeding counseling’ and was followed in the order of ‘conjugal conflict counseling’, ‘economic problem counseling’, ‘future route problem counseling’, ‘conflict between mother-in law and daughter-in law counseling’, ‘divorce before and after counseling’ and ‘conflict with parent counseling’. Through examining the results, it was found that the family healthiness showed differently by local citizens’ living foundations and living environment and a difference existed in the order of priority in the Healthy Family-Support Center’s common essential business and the degree of demand of the local citizens. Therefore, the Healthy Family-Support Center’s implement of common essential business differ by urbanization degree and large cities and differs by the characteristics of the local citizen, which makes the execution of the common essential business in local Healthy Family-Support Center difficult. The Healthy Family-Support Center program development and execution should appropriately reflect local features and local citizens demand, the autonomy of local Healthy Family-Support Center has to be expended and for the Healthy Family-Support Center to be perceived as a essential institution in local society to enhance family healthiness in local society, the business should be operated focusing on users and not the providers.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제1장 서 론 1
• 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
• 2. 연구문제 3
• 1) 조사대상자의 가족건강성 수준은 어떠한가? 3
• 2) 조사대상자의 건강가정지원센터 프로그램에 대한 요구도는 어떠한가? 3
• 제2장 이론적 배경 4
• 1. 가족의 건강성 4
• 2. 건강가정지원센터 6
• 3. 칠곡군의 특성 8
• 4. 건강가정지원센터에 대한 선행연구 고찰 9
• 제3장 연구방법 11
• 1. 연구대상 및 자료수집 11
• 2. 측정도구 구성 11
• 3. 자료분석 14
• 제4장 연구결과 및 분석 15
• 1. 조사대상자의 일반적 특성 15
• 2. 가족 건강성 20
• 3. 부부관계 25
• 4. 건강가정지원센터 프로그램 실태 및 요구도 29
• 1) 건강가정지원센터의 인지도 29
• 2) 건강가정지원센터의 프로그램 참여경험 31
• 3) 건강가정지원센터의 프로그램 참여 시 선호요일 및 시간대 34
• 4) 상담관련 실태 및 요구도 37
• 5) 여가활동 실태 및 요구도 43
• 6) 교육․문화 프로그램의 요구도 44
• 7) 문제해결을 위한 상담 요구도 46
• 8) 지역별 교육 프로그램의 요구도 47
• 9) 지역별 문화 프로그램 요구도 50
• 10) 지역별 문제해결을 위한 상담 요구도 52
• 제5장 결론 및 제언 54
• 1. 결론 54
• 2. 제한점 및 제언 59
• 참고 문헌 60
• 부록 : 설문지 63