RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    한국정부 수립 이후 행정체제의 변동과 국가기록관리체제의 개편에 관한 연구 : 1948년 ~ 1964년

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11627774

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The national records management system of the Korean Government has been developed in a close relationship with changes in the administrative system. The national records management system immediately after the establishment of the Korean Government, began to be reformed as a system with a new feature during the quick transition of the administrative system during the early 1960s. Particularly from this period, records began to be managed in a monistic way on the national level, and this holds an important meaning in that it was a basic framework that defined the records management pattern of the Korean Government for the later 40 years. Therefore, this study aims to identify the origin and the constitutional process of the national records management system amidst the transitional process of the Korean administrative system.
    At the time of establishing the government, the administrative system of the Korean Government was not completely free from the framework of the administrative system of the Chosen General Government. This was mainly because the Korean Government had no capability to renovate the administrative system. This was not an exception also for the national records management system. In other words, the forms and preparation methods of official document, an official document management process, and the classification and appraisal system used the original records management system of the Chosen General Government without any alteration.
    Main factors that brought about the reform of the national records management system as well as the change in the Korean administrative system during the early 1960s, were being created in Korean society, starting from the mid 1950s. This resulted from the growth of Korean Army, public officers, and students of administrative science as being the intrinsic elites of Korean society through their respective experience of the US administration. In particular, the reform of the creation, classification, filing, transfer, and preservation system shown during the introduction of a scientific management system of the US Army in the Korean Army was a meaningful change given the historic developmental process of Korean records management system history. This change had a decisive effect on the reform of The national records management system during the early 1960s.
    As the Korean Army, public officers, and students of administrative science, who had posted growth beginning in the mid-1950s, emerged as administrative elites during the early 1960s, the administrative system of the Korean Government brought about a change, which was different from the past in terms of its quality, and the modernization work of documentary administration pursued during the period, became extended to the reform of the national records management system. Then, the direction of reform was ‘the efficient and effective control’ over records, based on scientific management. Various official document forms, standards, and the gist of process were improved and standardized, and the appraisal system based on the function-based classification were unified on the government level by introducing a decimal filing system.
    The national records management system implemented during the early 1960s holds the following meanings in history of korean records management system.
    First, the monistic national records management system has begun to be operated on the government level for the first time since the establishment of the government. From this period, the national records management system was constructed targeting all records created by the national administrative authority, subject to management. That is, the records management methods including creation, classification, filing, appraisal, and preservation were standardized on the government level. This has been established since the legislation of Government Document Regulations, Government Document Classification Scheme, Official Document Management Regulations, and Records Schedule.
    Second, the strategies for coping with the mass production system of records have begun to be groped for first since the establishment of the government, and the scientific management method based on ‘efficiency’ and ‘effectiveness’ began to be reflected in the national records management system. The scientific management method had a concept of pursuing the rationalization of either business operations or management on the basis of standardization, organizing, and controlling, and the US office management system and decimal filing system were a sort of scientific management method featuring promptness, accuracy, manageability, practicality, and economic efficiency. The introduction of these systems into the Korean Government enabled the government to systematically manage a huge amount of records.
    Third, the national records management system at the time of the establishment of the government, were not free from the framework formed by heteronomous factors, but the subjective and voluntary will of the Korean Government was triggered to be reflected in the national records management system from the period. Back then, the introduction of the US office management system and decimal filing system to the Korean Government was implemented within the subjective transfiguration work. To put it differently, the Korean Army after the Korean War simply implanted the US Army system into its system, but the Korean Government not only adjusted the system to the reality of Korea, but also transfigured the system subjectively while including new factors.
    In conclusion, such changes did not lead to successful records management. This system was faithful to its role in efficiently utilizing records and promptly dealing with a vast amount of records from the perspective of administrative management. Nevertheless, it was not sufficient to satisfy the historic, social, and cultural role of a nation, namely, the transmission and preservation of records heritages as well as the realization of responsible administration in terms of records management. This was mostly because it failed to overcome the limitation of the times, which was the lack of perception about records management.
    번역하기

    The national records management system of the Korean Government has been developed in a close relationship with changes in the administrative system. The national records management system immediately after the establishment of the Korean Government, ...

    The national records management system of the Korean Government has been developed in a close relationship with changes in the administrative system. The national records management system immediately after the establishment of the Korean Government, began to be reformed as a system with a new feature during the quick transition of the administrative system during the early 1960s. Particularly from this period, records began to be managed in a monistic way on the national level, and this holds an important meaning in that it was a basic framework that defined the records management pattern of the Korean Government for the later 40 years. Therefore, this study aims to identify the origin and the constitutional process of the national records management system amidst the transitional process of the Korean administrative system.
    At the time of establishing the government, the administrative system of the Korean Government was not completely free from the framework of the administrative system of the Chosen General Government. This was mainly because the Korean Government had no capability to renovate the administrative system. This was not an exception also for the national records management system. In other words, the forms and preparation methods of official document, an official document management process, and the classification and appraisal system used the original records management system of the Chosen General Government without any alteration.
    Main factors that brought about the reform of the national records management system as well as the change in the Korean administrative system during the early 1960s, were being created in Korean society, starting from the mid 1950s. This resulted from the growth of Korean Army, public officers, and students of administrative science as being the intrinsic elites of Korean society through their respective experience of the US administration. In particular, the reform of the creation, classification, filing, transfer, and preservation system shown during the introduction of a scientific management system of the US Army in the Korean Army was a meaningful change given the historic developmental process of Korean records management system history. This change had a decisive effect on the reform of The national records management system during the early 1960s.
    As the Korean Army, public officers, and students of administrative science, who had posted growth beginning in the mid-1950s, emerged as administrative elites during the early 1960s, the administrative system of the Korean Government brought about a change, which was different from the past in terms of its quality, and the modernization work of documentary administration pursued during the period, became extended to the reform of the national records management system. Then, the direction of reform was ‘the efficient and effective control’ over records, based on scientific management. Various official document forms, standards, and the gist of process were improved and standardized, and the appraisal system based on the function-based classification were unified on the government level by introducing a decimal filing system.
    The national records management system implemented during the early 1960s holds the following meanings in history of korean records management system.
    First, the monistic national records management system has begun to be operated on the government level for the first time since the establishment of the government. From this period, the national records management system was constructed targeting all records created by the national administrative authority, subject to management. That is, the records management methods including creation, classification, filing, appraisal, and preservation were standardized on the government level. This has been established since the legislation of Government Document Regulations, Government Document Classification Scheme, Official Document Management Regulations, and Records Schedule.
    Second, the strategies for coping with the mass production system of records have begun to be groped for first since the establishment of the government, and the scientific management method based on ‘efficiency’ and ‘effectiveness’ began to be reflected in the national records management system. The scientific management method had a concept of pursuing the rationalization of either business operations or management on the basis of standardization, organizing, and controlling, and the US office management system and decimal filing system were a sort of scientific management method featuring promptness, accuracy, manageability, practicality, and economic efficiency. The introduction of these systems into the Korean Government enabled the government to systematically manage a huge amount of records.
    Third, the national records management system at the time of the establishment of the government, were not free from the framework formed by heteronomous factors, but the subjective and voluntary will of the Korean Government was triggered to be reflected in the national records management system from the period. Back then, the introduction of the US office management system and decimal filing system to the Korean Government was implemented within the subjective transfiguration work. To put it differently, the Korean Army after the Korean War simply implanted the US Army system into its system, but the Korean Government not only adjusted the system to the reality of Korea, but also transfigured the system subjectively while including new factors.
    In conclusion, such changes did not lead to successful records management. This system was faithful to its role in efficiently utilizing records and promptly dealing with a vast amount of records from the perspective of administrative management. Nevertheless, it was not sufficient to satisfy the historic, social, and cultural role of a nation, namely, the transmission and preservation of records heritages as well as the realization of responsible administration in terms of records management. This was mostly because it failed to overcome the limitation of the times, which was the lack of perception about records management.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 제1절 연구의 배경과 목표 = 1
    • 제2절 선행연구 검토 = 7
    • 제3절 연구범위와 방법 = 11
    • 제2장 정부수립 초 기록관리체제 = 13
    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 제1절 연구의 배경과 목표 = 1
    • 제2절 선행연구 검토 = 7
    • 제3절 연구범위와 방법 = 11
    • 제2장 정부수립 초 기록관리체제 = 13
    • 제1절 정부수립 초 한국정부의 행정환경 = 13
    • 제2절 정부수립 초 기록관리체제 = 22
    • 제3장 한국전쟁 이후 미국 과학적 관리제도의 도입과 그 영향 = 39
    • 제1절 미국행정학(과학적 관리법)의 발달과 그 배경 = 39
    • 제2절 한국전쟁 이후 한국군의 성장과 기록관리체제의 개편 = 43
    • 1. 한국전쟁 이후 한국군의 성장과 과학적 관리제도 도입 = 43
    • 2. 한국육군 기록관리체제의 개편 = 45
    • 제3절 한국전쟁 이후 한국정부의 행정체제 개선 = 61
    • 1. 한국정부의 국가발전담론과 미국행정학의 도입 = 61
    • 2. 행정사무의 개선과 기록관리체제의 변화 = 65
    • 제4장 국가기록관리체제의 개편 = 69
    • 제1절 군사정부의 등장과 행정환경의 변화 = 69
    • 제2절 행정간소화작업과 정부공문서규정제정 = 74
    • 제3절 국가기록관리체제의 개편 = 79
    • 제5장 결론 = 93
    • 참고문헌 = 97
    • Abstract = 107
    • 부록 = 110
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼