한국어와 중국어의 어순 대비 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The main concern of this dissertation is to contrast the word order difference between Korean and Chinese and to make some suggestions for helping the students in the beginning level internalize Chinese word order.
In recent years,　Chinese return students coming into Korea are more and more. The two language both have differences and similarities. Because the difference of the two word orders, the Chinese students who are learning Korean grammar will come across many difficulties.
In the light of the linguistic typology, Korean is SOV type, Chinese is SVO and SOV type. Chinese word order is much fixed, since the word order of the Chinese determine meaning. On the other side, Korean word order is relatively free because of a case system. Free word order of constituents in basic word order is defined as a scrambling. Although Korean word order is free, there are so many constituents can not change. So, the first thing is to analyze and compare the Korean and Chinese basic word order. And then, I will find some Korean word order which is not free, for example, Korean word order of verb-final is strict. The attributive and the adverbial adjunct always precedes the head word. An object usually precedes the predicate verb and so on. According this I will compare the Korean and Chinese word order. To the contrary, word order of objects determine meaning in Chinese. In Korean scrambling is also allow in the internal structure of nominal modifiers and all nominal modifiers precede nouns.
Grammatically word order plays the main role in the Chinese language. Word order is extremely important since words and sentence element in a sentence must be combined and placed according to a certain order.
Like the fact mentioned above, there are many difference between Chinese and Korean in word order. Chinese students study Korean as a foreign language, and especially the students in the beginning level have difficulty in learning Chinese word order because of mother tongue interference.
Therefore, it is suggested that emphasis should be put on the student centered learning based on the contrastive and comparative study between native language and target language. That is not only meaningful for the Chinese students but also the Korean students.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제1장 서론 1
• 1.1 연구목적 1
• 1.2 연구 방법 및 범위 3
• 1.3 선행 연구 4
• 제2장 이론적 배경 8
• 2.1. 한국어 기본 어순 8
• 2.2. 중국어 기본 어순 11
• 2.3. 자유 어순과 고정 어순 15
• 제3장 한국어와 중국어의 어순 대비 20
• 3.1 한국어 어순 20
• 3.1.1 서술어 위치 20
• 3.1.2 목적어의 위치 21
• 3.1.3 부사어의 위치 22
• 3.1.4 관형어의 위치 23
• 3.1.5. 조사의 위치 26
• 3.2 중국어의 어순 27
• 3.2.1 서술어의 위치 27
• 3.2.2 목적어의 위치 29
• 3.2.3 부사어의 위치 32
• 3.2.4 보어의 위치 34
• 3.2.5 관형어의 위치 38
• 3.2.6 전치사와 후치사의 위치 39
• 3.3 한국어와 중국어의 어순 대비 42
• 3.3.1 한국어와 중국어의 서술어 대비 42
• 3.3.2 한국어와 중국어의 목적어 대비 44
• 3.3.3 한국어와 중국어의 부사어 대비 44
• 3.3.4 중출 부사어의 상대어순 대비 56
• 3.3.5 중출 관형어의 상대어순 대비 63
• 3.3.6 전치사 및 후치사 66
• 3.4 초급 한국어 학습자를 위한 한국어 어순 교수 방안 67
• 3.4.1 한국어 어순 지도의 기본 원칙 69
• 3.4.2 한국어 문장 어순 지도 방안의 실례 73
• 제4장 결론 81
• 참고문헌 85