RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    고등학생의 성취목표 지향 프로파일 분석 = Analysis of High School Students' Achievement Goal Orientation Profiles

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11606744

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      전주: 전북대학교 대학원, 2009

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(박사) -- 전북대학교 대학원 대학원 , 교육학(교육심리) , 2009. 2

    • 발행연도

      2009

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • 발행국(도시)

      전북특별자치도

    • 기타서명

      Analysis of High School Students' Achievement Goal Orientation Profiles

    • 형태사항

      xi, 100p: 표; 26cm

    • 일반주기명

      전북대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
      지도교수:나동진
      참고문헌 : p. 83-93

    • 소장기관
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
      • 전북대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to analyze the Achievement Goal Orientation(AGO) profiles of High School Students and to test the differences in Academic Self-Efficacy(ASE), Learning Strategy(LS), Academic Achievement(AA), and Implicit (Incremental) Theory of Intelligence (IITI) among AGO profiles.
    In order to accomplish this purpose, this study tested the following three research hypotheses. H1) AGO profiles, respectively homogeneous but distinctive, can be derived from the four dimensions of highschool students' AGOs. H2) In the multi-AGO view, AGO profiles have significant differences in ASE, LS, AA and IITI. H3) Gender and AGO profiles' interaction and School types and AGO profiles' interaction lead to differences in the relations between AGO profiles and study-related variants(AA, ASE, LS, IITI).
    The subjects of this study were 508 highschool 1st year students(346 boys and 162 girls) in Jeollabuk-Do. This study measured students' AGO, ASE, LS and IITI with AGO questionaire, ASE Inventory, LS questionaire and IITI measure. AA scores are the nationwide test results held by the 15 local education offices.
    To analyze the collected data, cluster analysis, ANOVA and univariate analysis of variance were used through Amos 4.0 and SPSS 12 program.
    The results of analyses could be summarized as follows: R1) Five AGO profiles, respectively homogeneous but distinctive, were derived from the four dimensions of highschool students' AGOs. R2) Significant differences in ASE, LS, AA and IITI were confirmed among the AGO profiles. R3) Gender and AGO profiles' interaction effect and school types and AGO profiles' interaction effect on the relation between AGO profile clusters and study-related variants(AA, ASE, LS, IITI) have some signigicant relationships, being not wholly confirmed.
    To better understand and design the class instruction, multi-AGO view and AGO profile clustering can be a helpful way and provide more information about students and related variables.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to analyze the Achievement Goal Orientation(AGO) profiles of High School Students and to test the differences in Academic Self-Efficacy(ASE), Learning Strategy(LS), Academic Achievement(AA), and Implicit (Incremental) Theo...

    The purpose of this study is to analyze the Achievement Goal Orientation(AGO) profiles of High School Students and to test the differences in Academic Self-Efficacy(ASE), Learning Strategy(LS), Academic Achievement(AA), and Implicit (Incremental) Theory of Intelligence (IITI) among AGO profiles.
    In order to accomplish this purpose, this study tested the following three research hypotheses. H1) AGO profiles, respectively homogeneous but distinctive, can be derived from the four dimensions of highschool students' AGOs. H2) In the multi-AGO view, AGO profiles have significant differences in ASE, LS, AA and IITI. H3) Gender and AGO profiles' interaction and School types and AGO profiles' interaction lead to differences in the relations between AGO profiles and study-related variants(AA, ASE, LS, IITI).
    The subjects of this study were 508 highschool 1st year students(346 boys and 162 girls) in Jeollabuk-Do. This study measured students' AGO, ASE, LS and IITI with AGO questionaire, ASE Inventory, LS questionaire and IITI measure. AA scores are the nationwide test results held by the 15 local education offices.
    To analyze the collected data, cluster analysis, ANOVA and univariate analysis of variance were used through Amos 4.0 and SPSS 12 program.
    The results of analyses could be summarized as follows: R1) Five AGO profiles, respectively homogeneous but distinctive, were derived from the four dimensions of highschool students' AGOs. R2) Significant differences in ASE, LS, AA and IITI were confirmed among the AGO profiles. R3) Gender and AGO profiles' interaction effect and school types and AGO profiles' interaction effect on the relation between AGO profile clusters and study-related variants(AA, ASE, LS, IITI) have some signigicant relationships, being not wholly confirmed.
    To better understand and design the class instruction, multi-AGO view and AGO profile clustering can be a helpful way and provide more information about students and related variables.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • A. 연구의 필요성과 목적 = 1
    • B. 연구 문제 = 6
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 7
    • A. 성취목표지향의 구조 = 7
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • A. 연구의 필요성과 목적 = 1
    • B. 연구 문제 = 6
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 7
    • A. 성취목표지향의 구조 = 7
    • B. 2×2 성취목표지향 각 목표유형의 특성 = 18
    • C. 암묵적 지능이론, 자기효능감, 학습전략 및 학업성취와 성취목표지향의 관계 = 23
    • D. 성취목표지향에 대한 최근의 연구 동향 = 34
    • Ⅲ. 연구가설 = 36
    • Ⅳ. 연구방법 및 절차 = 38
    • A. 연구대상 = 38
    • B. 측정도구 = 39
    • C. 자료의 처리 = 42
    • Ⅴ. 연구결과 = 45
    • A. 기술통계치 = 45
    • B. 성취목표지향 4차원 기준 군집분석 = 46
    • C. 성취목표지향 프로파일 분석 = 50
    • Ⅵ. 논의 = 71
    • Ⅶ. 결론 및 제언 = 77
    • A. 결론 = 77
    • B. 제언 = 79
    • 참고문헌 = 83
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼