학습장애학생의 수학중재전략 및 관련변인에 관한 메타분석 = Meta-Analysis of Mathematics Interventions Strategies and Variables for Students with Learning Disabilities

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study was to analyse the efficacy of mathematics intervention programs for students with learning disabilities. The concrete study questions are the followings;
Are there any differences among the effect sizes of mathematics intervention strategies for students with learning disabilities?
Are there any differences among the effect sizes of mathematics intervention variables for students with learning disabilities?

The method of this study was the meta-analytic methodologies to analyse group-subject design experimental studies in the learning disability literature from 1970 to the present. The research resulted in 29 effect sizes for the 24 studies.
The conclusions of this study were as follows.
First, the overall weighted mean effect size of mathematics intervention strategies for students with learning disabilities was very large(ES=1.22). Self instruction was found to be more effective than mediated/assisted instruction or cognition-metacognitive strategies.
Second, the mathematics intervention variables of sample characteristics, research design, and publication characteristics showed large mean effect sizes. The results for sample characteristics suggest that students who had IQ scores below 95 scored higher than students with IQ scores above 95. In the research design, long-term intervention are more effective then short-term intervention.

In summary, the present results are encouraging for mathematics education and for students with learning disabilities. It is recommended that mathematics intervention strategies could be implemented effectively to students with learning disabilities in mathematics.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
• 1. 연구의 필요성 = 1
• 2. 연구의 문제 = 4
• 3. 용어정리 = 4
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 6
• 1. 수학학습장애의 특성 = 6
• 2. 수학학습장애의 교수 전략 = 9
• 3. 메타분석의 개념과 효과크기 = 17
• 4. 선행연구의 고찰 = 22
• Ⅲ. 연구 방법 = 26
• 1. 연구 대상 = 26
• 2. 연구의 절차 = 28
• 3. 자료의 분석 = 29
• Ⅳ. 결과 및 해석 = 34
• 1. 수학중재전략에 따른 효과크기 = 34
• 2. 중재변인에 따른 효과크기 = 39
• Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 = 45
• 1. 결론 = 45
• 2. 제언 = 47
• 참고문헌 = 48
• (Abstract) = 55
• 부록 = 57