RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    갑상선 결절의 수술 전 전산화 단층 촬영과 초음파 검사의 효용성

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11559823

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Background and Objectives : The thyroid nodule can be evaluated with several different diagnostic imaging techniques, of which the most commonly used are ultrasonography(US) and computed tomography(CT). This study was aimed to evaluate the clinical values of US by comparing CT with respect to imaging primary lesions, metastatic lymph nodes and invasion of adjacent structures around thyroid.
    Materials and Method : Seventy one patients who underwent surgery for thyroid nodules as an initial treatment from January 2005 to 2006 were retrospective evaluated by medical record review. In each patients, the following points were documented according to their size of nodule, metastatic lymph nodes and invasion of adjacent structures around thyroid.
    Results : For predicting size and multiplicity of thyroid nodules, US and CT showed a sensitivity of 67.9% and 53.6%, diagnostic accuracy of 67.9% and 53.6%. For predicting lymph node metastases, US and CT showed a sensitivity of 76.9% and 84.6%, specificity of 86.7% and 93.8%, diagnostic accuracy of 82.1% and 89.7%. For predicting invasion of adjacent structures around thyroid, US and CT showed a sensitivity of 75.0% and 83.3%, specificity of 87.5% and 81.3%, both diagnostic accuracy of 82.1%.
    Conclusions : We were not able to prove the difference of the clinical values between US and CT for preoperative diagnostic purpose. US is noninvasive, nonirradiate, relatively inexpensive imaging method that visualizes the thyroid gland than CT. Thus, we can use only US as a radiologic method for diagnostic purpose in previous operation of thyroid nodules.
    번역하기

    Background and Objectives : The thyroid nodule can be evaluated with several different diagnostic imaging techniques, of which the most commonly used are ultrasonography(US) and computed tomography(CT). This study was aimed to evaluate the clinical va...

    Background and Objectives : The thyroid nodule can be evaluated with several different diagnostic imaging techniques, of which the most commonly used are ultrasonography(US) and computed tomography(CT). This study was aimed to evaluate the clinical values of US by comparing CT with respect to imaging primary lesions, metastatic lymph nodes and invasion of adjacent structures around thyroid.
    Materials and Method : Seventy one patients who underwent surgery for thyroid nodules as an initial treatment from January 2005 to 2006 were retrospective evaluated by medical record review. In each patients, the following points were documented according to their size of nodule, metastatic lymph nodes and invasion of adjacent structures around thyroid.
    Results : For predicting size and multiplicity of thyroid nodules, US and CT showed a sensitivity of 67.9% and 53.6%, diagnostic accuracy of 67.9% and 53.6%. For predicting lymph node metastases, US and CT showed a sensitivity of 76.9% and 84.6%, specificity of 86.7% and 93.8%, diagnostic accuracy of 82.1% and 89.7%. For predicting invasion of adjacent structures around thyroid, US and CT showed a sensitivity of 75.0% and 83.3%, specificity of 87.5% and 81.3%, both diagnostic accuracy of 82.1%.
    Conclusions : We were not able to prove the difference of the clinical values between US and CT for preoperative diagnostic purpose. US is noninvasive, nonirradiate, relatively inexpensive imaging method that visualizes the thyroid gland than CT. Thus, we can use only US as a radiologic method for diagnostic purpose in previous operation of thyroid nodules.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 서 론 1
    • II. 연구대상 및 방법 2
    • III. 결과 3
    • IV. 고 찰 6
    • V. 결론 11
    • I. 서 론 1
    • II. 연구대상 및 방법 2
    • III. 결과 3
    • IV. 고 찰 6
    • V. 결론 11
    • VI. 참고문헌 12
    • Table and legends 15
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼