RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    한국어 조건 표현 연결 어미 교육 방안 연구 = (A) Study on an Educational Plan for the Conjunctive Endings in the Korean-language Conditional

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11545471

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      서울 : 경희대학교 교육대학원, 2009

    • 학위논문사항
    • 발행연도

      2009

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • DDC

      411 판사항(22)

    • 발행국(도시)

      서울

    • 형태사항

      v, 100 p. : 도표 ; 26 cm

    • 일반주기명

      경희대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
      지도교수: 김기혁
      참고문헌 : p. 88-95

    • 소장기관
      • 경희대학교 국제캠퍼스 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 경희대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to suggest a plan for possibly educating effectively the conjunctive endings in the conditional for learners in the intermediate and advanced level of Korean language, centering on semantics-function in light of speech act in ‘-myeon, -geodeun, -eoya’ of the conjunctive endings in the conditional.
    As Chapter 1 is introduction, it examined about which position the conjunctive endings in the conditional possess among the conjunctive endings in Korean language. Based on the interview and the prior questionnaire research targeting learners in the intermediate and advanced level for Korean language, it examined the aspect of using the conjunctive endings in the conditional in learners. As a result, the learners were confusing the conjunctive endings in the conditional with the categories of semantics in causality and concession. As a whole, the students showed the phenomenon of using by replacing other conjunctive endings in the conditional with ‘-myeon.' Based on this, the research objective and necessity in this study were presented. Also, through a preceding research, the research contents were examined on the conjunctive endings in the conditional for the Korean-language academic circles and the Korean-language education academic circles.
    In Chapter 2, each difference was examined by mutually comparing the category in causality and concession adjacent to the category in the conditional. As a result, the conditional and causality show the difference in gradability, thereby having been able to be known that there is the meaning of supposition only in the conditional. Also, it could be known that it is divided into the conditional and concession according to whether the focus of information is on the preceding and escorting clause or only on the escorting clause, and that the concession has the meaning called the negation in other conditional. Next, by examining the syntactic restriction in ‘-myeon, -geodeun, -eoya’ of the conjunctive endings in the conditional, it allowed learners' error in type to be possibly reduced.
    In Chapter 3, based on Austin(1962)'s speech-act theory, it examined the semantics-function in light of speech act in ‘-myeon, -geodeun, -eoya’ of the conjunctive endings in the conditional. Each of the conjunctive endings in the conditional has the semantics in the illocutionary act of centering on a speaker, and in the perlocutionary act of inducing a listener's response, thereby having raised necessity of allowing learners to perceive this function of speech act. Also, through analyzing the current Korean-language textbook, most of teaching materials were recorded by mixing the function and activity in light of communication. It examined it to be suggested focusing on the function in light of communication rather than the semantics-function in light of speech act.
    In Chapter 4, it presented an educational plan for the conjunctive endings in the conditional centering on semantics-function in light of speech act in the conjunctive endings of the conditional, and prepared the actually teaching-guidance plan based on this.
    Finally in Chapter 5, it summarized and arranged the contents and results in this study, and described on significance and limitation of a research.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to suggest a plan for possibly educating effectively the conjunctive endings in the conditional for learners in the intermediate and advanced level of Korean language, centering on semantics-function in light of speech ac...

    The purpose of this study was to suggest a plan for possibly educating effectively the conjunctive endings in the conditional for learners in the intermediate and advanced level of Korean language, centering on semantics-function in light of speech act in ‘-myeon, -geodeun, -eoya’ of the conjunctive endings in the conditional.
    As Chapter 1 is introduction, it examined about which position the conjunctive endings in the conditional possess among the conjunctive endings in Korean language. Based on the interview and the prior questionnaire research targeting learners in the intermediate and advanced level for Korean language, it examined the aspect of using the conjunctive endings in the conditional in learners. As a result, the learners were confusing the conjunctive endings in the conditional with the categories of semantics in causality and concession. As a whole, the students showed the phenomenon of using by replacing other conjunctive endings in the conditional with ‘-myeon.' Based on this, the research objective and necessity in this study were presented. Also, through a preceding research, the research contents were examined on the conjunctive endings in the conditional for the Korean-language academic circles and the Korean-language education academic circles.
    In Chapter 2, each difference was examined by mutually comparing the category in causality and concession adjacent to the category in the conditional. As a result, the conditional and causality show the difference in gradability, thereby having been able to be known that there is the meaning of supposition only in the conditional. Also, it could be known that it is divided into the conditional and concession according to whether the focus of information is on the preceding and escorting clause or only on the escorting clause, and that the concession has the meaning called the negation in other conditional. Next, by examining the syntactic restriction in ‘-myeon, -geodeun, -eoya’ of the conjunctive endings in the conditional, it allowed learners' error in type to be possibly reduced.
    In Chapter 3, based on Austin(1962)'s speech-act theory, it examined the semantics-function in light of speech act in ‘-myeon, -geodeun, -eoya’ of the conjunctive endings in the conditional. Each of the conjunctive endings in the conditional has the semantics in the illocutionary act of centering on a speaker, and in the perlocutionary act of inducing a listener's response, thereby having raised necessity of allowing learners to perceive this function of speech act. Also, through analyzing the current Korean-language textbook, most of teaching materials were recorded by mixing the function and activity in light of communication. It examined it to be suggested focusing on the function in light of communication rather than the semantics-function in light of speech act.
    In Chapter 4, it presented an educational plan for the conjunctive endings in the conditional centering on semantics-function in light of speech act in the conjunctive endings of the conditional, and prepared the actually teaching-guidance plan based on this.
    Finally in Chapter 5, it summarized and arranged the contents and results in this study, and described on significance and limitation of a research.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 서론 = 1
    • 1.1 연구의 필요성과 목적 = 1
    • 1.2 선행연구 = 7
    • 1.2.1 국어학계의 연구 = 7
    • 1.2.2 한국어교육학계의 연구 = 11
    • 1. 서론 = 1
    • 1.1 연구의 필요성과 목적 = 1
    • 1.2 선행연구 = 7
    • 1.2.1 국어학계의 연구 = 7
    • 1.2.2 한국어교육학계의 연구 = 11
    • 1.3 연구 방법 = 15
    • 2. 조건 표현 연결 어미의 특징 = 16
    • 2.1 인접 범주와의 의미 비교 = 16
    • 2.1.1 조건과 인과 = 20
    • 2.1.2 조건과 양보 = 23
    • 2.2 통사적 특징 = 27
    • 2.2.1 주어 및 서술어 제약 = 27
    • 2.2.2 시제선어말어미 제약 = 32
    • 2.2.3 의향법 제약 = 35
    • 2.2.4 부정법 제약 = 38
    • 2.2.5 보조사와의 결합 제약 = 41
    • 2.2.6 대동사와의 결합 제약 = 42
    • 3. 조건 표현 연결 어미의 의미-기능 = 45
    • 3.1 '-면' = 48
    • 3.2 '-거든' = 52
    • 3.3 '-어야' = 55
    • 3.4 한국어 교재의 의미-기능 분석 = 59
    • 4. 의미-기능 중심 교육 방안 = 69
    • 4.1 의미-기능 중심 교수 · 학습 모형 = 69
    • 4.2 의미-기능 중심 교육의 실제 = 73
    • 5. 결론 = 85
    • 참고문헌 = 88
    • 부록 = 96
    • 부록 1 사전 설문지 = 96
    • ABSTRACT = 99
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼