RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Cognitive engagement as a predictor of achievement.

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11540739

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to examine how well a measure of cognitive engagement predicted achievement test scores after controlling for other types of engagement. The study also examined differences in cognitive engagement for general and special education students and if cognitive engagement predicted achievement differently for the two groups of students. Cognitive engagement was defined as consisting of motivation to learn, self-regulation, and investment in learning.
    Participants were 1,921 ninth-grade students in a diverse, urban school district. The sample consisted of 1,789 students in general education and 132 students receiving special education services. Participants completed a self-report measure of cognitive and psychological engagement. Indicators of academic and behavioral engagement, including attendance records and number of credits accrued, were obtained from the school district's database.
    Results indicated that two factors from the measure of cognitive engagement were significant predictors of achievement after controlling for other types of engagement. Scores on the factor of Future Aspirations and Goals were a significant positive predictor of achievement test performance, while scores on the factor of Control and Relevance of School Work were a significant negative predictor. Results indicated significant differences between the two groups of students on the two cognitive engagement factors, but the effect was small. One of the cognitive engagement factors, Control and Relevance of School Work, predicted achievement differently for general and special education students. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to examine how well a measure of cognitive engagement predicted achievement test scores after controlling for other types of engagement. The study also examined differences in cognitive engagement for general and special...

    The purpose of this study was to examine how well a measure of cognitive engagement predicted achievement test scores after controlling for other types of engagement. The study also examined differences in cognitive engagement for general and special education students and if cognitive engagement predicted achievement differently for the two groups of students. Cognitive engagement was defined as consisting of motivation to learn, self-regulation, and investment in learning.
    Participants were 1,921 ninth-grade students in a diverse, urban school district. The sample consisted of 1,789 students in general education and 132 students receiving special education services. Participants completed a self-report measure of cognitive and psychological engagement. Indicators of academic and behavioral engagement, including attendance records and number of credits accrued, were obtained from the school district's database.
    Results indicated that two factors from the measure of cognitive engagement were significant predictors of achievement after controlling for other types of engagement. Scores on the factor of Future Aspirations and Goals were a significant positive predictor of achievement test performance, while scores on the factor of Control and Relevance of School Work were a significant negative predictor. Results indicated significant differences between the two groups of students on the two cognitive engagement factors, but the effect was small. One of the cognitive engagement factors, Control and Relevance of School Work, predicted achievement differently for general and special education students. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼