소방검사의 시장중심거버넌스 형성에 관한 연구 = Application of market-based governance to fire inspection system

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

What is the reason of the frequent conflagration of Korean society? Why we cannot improve from the mistake of repeated conflagration in an identical pattern at the same building or place? How shall we improve essential Fire Inspection System for the prevention of the conflagration?
This study originates in the awareness of the issue above and we assume the Fire Inspection System in force is the problem in the aspect of preventative dimension. Accordingly, suggesting the right answers to the problems above and the improvement plan of the Fire Inspection System through the case analysis of the conflagration would be the object of this study.
The problems of the current Fire Inspection System are considered in a circumstantial and institutional way in this study and the institutional improvement plan to the questions such as What kind of problem does the current Fire Inspection System (dual system of fire department and vicarious executive enterprise) have? and Which way should it be developed? and What is the concrete alternative plan of enforcing professional and systematical fire inspection to prevent and reduce the conflagration? is also suggested.
This study mainly depended upon the documentary survey, case study, comparative study and policy Delphi. In this context the autonomous preventive systematic Fire Inspection System is (rather) suggested. Besides, as the Fire Service Act has been changed a lot legally since it is divided into four laws through the overall revision in 2003, the legal system which is the systematical side of the fire inspection and the analysis of the present situation are required. This study also derived reform plans from the analysis of the inspection of foreign developed countries.
The analysis objects of this study are the conflagrations occurred from 1971 through 2006 and the analysis category is based mainly on the stage of prevention and preparation among the fire service policies process. The results show that the conflagration is mainly caused by the failure of the initial response and fire suppression operation, the red-tape and non-professional fire inspection, the legislative system related fire department and irrationality of the fire service force management, and the negligence about fire protection and safety management of the buildings and structures. Especially 75.2% of these factors are caused by careless fire inspection. Consequently, many of the conflagration would be prevented or reduced once the fire inspection is faithfully enforced.
According to the result of Delphi research, it appeared that the most effective way is using the method of the new public management or new-governanced approach to reduce the conflagration and improve the current Fire Inspection System. Since the fire service authority itself is limited, the governance theory confirms that solving some part of the fire inspection with commitment out of the non-official organization is remarkably efficient.
As the answer to the question of Who would be in charge of the fire inspection?, and How would it be fulfilled to make it efficient and effective? we derived the consequence such as It would be desirable to commit it out of non-official organizations by dividing it into three stage and the market-based new governance theory should be applied and enforced continually.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
• 1. 문제의 제기 = 1
• 2. 연구방법 및 범위 = 6
• 3. 연구의 동향 = 8
• Ⅱ. 소방검사에 관한 이론적 배경 = 12
• 1. 소방검사제도의 의의 = 12
• 가. 소방검사의 개요 = 12
• 나. 소방검사 변천과정 = 25
• 2. 민간위탁과 민영화에 관한 이론 = 35
• 가. 민간위탁에 관한 이론 = 35
• 나. 민영화에 관한 이론 = 44
• 다. 장단점과 한계 = 54
• 3. 소방검사와 시장중심거버넌스 = 58
• 가. 거버넌스의 의의와 유형 = 58
• 나. 시장중심적 거버넌스의 원리와 유형 = 75
• 다. 시장중심 거버넌스와 신공공관리론 = 77
• 라. 시장적 정부모형과 최소국가론 = 79
• 마. 소방행정에 대한 거버넌스이론의 적용과 한계 = 81
• Ⅲ. 소방검사제도의 운영실태 = 89
• 1. 소방검사업무의 현황과 실태 = 89
• 가. 소방검사업무의 흐름과 현황 = 89
• 나. 소방검사업무의 문제점 = 104
• 2. 관련분야의 안전검사제도 비교 = 132
• 가. 전기안전점검제도 = 132
• 나. 가스안전점검제도 = 139
• 다. 화재보험협회의 검사제도 = 154
• 라. 시사점 = 158
• 3. 외국의 소방검사제도 비교 = 160
• 가. 일본의 소방검사제도 = 160
• 나. 영국의 소방검사제도 = 169
• 다. 미국의 소방검사제도 = 175
• 라. 시사점 = 178
• Ⅳ. 대형화재 사례분석 = 180
• 1. 사례분석의 의의와 분석틀 = 180
• 가. 사례분석의 의의 = 180
• 나. 사례분석의 틀 = 184
• 2. 대형화재 사례분석 = 210
• 가. 사례 1: 서울 대연각호텔화재 = 211
• 나. 사례 2: 서울 대왕코너화재 = 221
• 다. 사례 3: 인천 히트노래방(라이브호프)화재 = 231
• 라. 사례 4: 서울 시민회관화재 = 241
• 마. 사례 5: 경기 화성씨랜드화재(청소년 수련의 집) = 249
• 바. 사례 6: 경기 여자기술학원화재 = 265
• Ⅴ. 소방검사제도의 혁신방안 = 273
• 1. 사례분석결과를 통해서 본 혁신방안 = 273
• 가. 대형화재 유발요인 = 273
• 나. 분석결과의 시사점 = 276
• 다. 분석결과 종합적 논의 = 283
• 2. 델파이조사를 통해서 본 혁신방안 = 285
• 가. 제1차 델파이 조사 분석 = 285
• 나. 제2차 델파이 조사 분석 = 301
• 3. 소방검사제도의 혁신방안 = 314
• 가. 사례분석을 통한 혁신방안 = 314
• 나. 델파이조사를 통한 혁신방안 = 318
• Ⅵ. 결론 = 326
• 1. 연구의 요약 = 326
• 2. 연구의 정책적 함의 = 329
• 3. 연구의 유용성과 한계 = 332
• 부록 = 334
• 참고문헌 = 344
• ABSTRACT = 365