RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      기업의 사회공헌과 경영성과의 쌍방관계에 관한 연구 : 국내 100대 기업의 기부금과 당기순이익의 관계를 중심으로 = (A) study on the unilateral relationship between corporate social contribution and management outcome : focusing on the relationship between donation and net income of top 100 corporations in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11380598

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        화성 : 수원대학교, 2008

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(박사) -- 수원대학교 대학원 , 경영학과 , 2008

      • 발행연도

        2008

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • KDC

        325.1 판사항(4)

      • DDC

        658.401 판사항(21)

      • 발행국(도시)

        경기도

      • 형태사항

        v, 103 p. ; 26 cm

      • 일반주기명

        참고문헌: p. 91-97

      • 소장기관
        • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
        • 수원대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to verify the unilateral relationship between corporate social contribution activities and management outcome of corporations by using cross-lagged autoregressive method based on fixed effect method, and to provide fundamental knowledge for future discussions on corporate social contribution and management outcome. For this purpose, social contribution and management outcome data of top 100 corporations in Korea have been gathered for 7 years between 1998 and 2004, and the data from 83 corporations have been used in the analysis. The main findings of this study are as follows.
      First, as for the autoregressive coefficient of the corporate social contribution, the unstandardized coefficient showed statistically significant at the marginal level. Therefore, preceding social contribution can be said to have positively significant influence on the following social contribution.
      Second, as for the autoregressive coefficient of the management outcome, the unstandardized coefficient showed statistically significant. Therefore, preceding management outcome can be said to have positively significant influence on the following management outcome.
      Third, as for the cross-lagged coefficient which explains the preceding social contribution having effect on the following management outcome, unstandardized coefficient did not show statistically significant. Therefore, the preceding social contribution has the same effect on the following management outcome, but the effect does not occur at a statistically significant level.
      Lastly, as for the cross-lagged coefficient which explains the preceding management outcome affecting the following social contribution, unstandardized coefficient showed statistically significant. Therefore, the preceding management outcome has the same influence on the following social contribution, and it occurs at a statistically significant level.
      Based on the above findings, the following suggestions can be made for subsequent studies.
      First, this study used a profit index, the ratio of net income in gross sales. Subsequent studies should once again verify the reciprocal relationship between the management outcome and the corporate social contribution by constituting the management outcome with stability index, growth, and activity index.
      Second, this study estimated corporate social contribution and management outcome with a relative scale of the ratio between donations against sales and net income. Future studies need to verify not only these social contribution and management outcome of relative scales but also the bilateral relationship between social contribution and management outcome using the absolute scale of donations and net income.
      Third, although previous year's effect may occur in various ways, this study adopted conventional methods and analyzed the data using the previous year's effect only. This requires further elaboration through various discussions and analysis.
      Fourth, this study analyzed the 7 years' data of corporate social responsibility and management outcome between 1998 and 2004. The two variables' data has been accumulated until 2008. Subsequent changes of the two after 2004 should be additionally analyzed to once again verify the outcome of this study that there is no reciprocal relationship between the corporate social contribution and the management outcome.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to verify the unilateral relationship between corporate social contribution activities and management outcome of corporations by using cross-lagged autoregressive method based on fixed effect method, and to provide fundame...

      The purpose of this study is to verify the unilateral relationship between corporate social contribution activities and management outcome of corporations by using cross-lagged autoregressive method based on fixed effect method, and to provide fundamental knowledge for future discussions on corporate social contribution and management outcome. For this purpose, social contribution and management outcome data of top 100 corporations in Korea have been gathered for 7 years between 1998 and 2004, and the data from 83 corporations have been used in the analysis. The main findings of this study are as follows.
      First, as for the autoregressive coefficient of the corporate social contribution, the unstandardized coefficient showed statistically significant at the marginal level. Therefore, preceding social contribution can be said to have positively significant influence on the following social contribution.
      Second, as for the autoregressive coefficient of the management outcome, the unstandardized coefficient showed statistically significant. Therefore, preceding management outcome can be said to have positively significant influence on the following management outcome.
      Third, as for the cross-lagged coefficient which explains the preceding social contribution having effect on the following management outcome, unstandardized coefficient did not show statistically significant. Therefore, the preceding social contribution has the same effect on the following management outcome, but the effect does not occur at a statistically significant level.
      Lastly, as for the cross-lagged coefficient which explains the preceding management outcome affecting the following social contribution, unstandardized coefficient showed statistically significant. Therefore, the preceding management outcome has the same influence on the following social contribution, and it occurs at a statistically significant level.
      Based on the above findings, the following suggestions can be made for subsequent studies.
      First, this study used a profit index, the ratio of net income in gross sales. Subsequent studies should once again verify the reciprocal relationship between the management outcome and the corporate social contribution by constituting the management outcome with stability index, growth, and activity index.
      Second, this study estimated corporate social contribution and management outcome with a relative scale of the ratio between donations against sales and net income. Future studies need to verify not only these social contribution and management outcome of relative scales but also the bilateral relationship between social contribution and management outcome using the absolute scale of donations and net income.
      Third, although previous year's effect may occur in various ways, this study adopted conventional methods and analyzed the data using the previous year's effect only. This requires further elaboration through various discussions and analysis.
      Fourth, this study analyzed the 7 years' data of corporate social responsibility and management outcome between 1998 and 2004. The two variables' data has been accumulated until 2008. Subsequent changes of the two after 2004 should be additionally analyzed to once again verify the outcome of this study that there is no reciprocal relationship between the corporate social contribution and the management outcome.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목 차
      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 5
      • 3. 연구 범위 및 방법 6
      • 목 차
      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 5
      • 3. 연구 범위 및 방법 6
      • 1) 연구의 범위와 구성 6
      • 2) 연구 방법 7
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 11
      • 1. 기업의 사회적 책임에 대한 논의 11
      • 1) 사회적 책임의 등장배경 11
      • 2) 사회적 책임의 개념 12
      • 3) 사회적 책임의 분류 13
      • 4) 사회적 책임모형 15
      • 5) 한국기업의 사회적 책임단계 18
      • 2. 기업의 사회공헌에 대한 논의 21
      • 1) 사회공헌의 정의 21
      • 2) 사회공헌의 당위성 24
      • 3) 사회공헌의 이론적 모델 25
      • 4) 사회공헌의 유형 29
      • 5) 사회공헌의 전개 동인 32
      • 6) 한국기업의 사회공헌과 기부현황 36
      • 3. 선행연구 고찰 41
      • 1) 기업의 사회공헌이 경영성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 선행연구 41
      • 2) 기업의 경영성과가 사회공헌에 미치는 영향에 관한 선행연구 43
      • 3) 기업의 사회공헌과 경영성과의 선순환적 관계에 대한 선행연구 45
      • Ⅲ. 연구 설계 및 모형 47
      • 1. 연구 모형 및 연구 질문 47
      • 2. 조작적 정의 51
      • 1) 기업 사회공헌의 조작적 정의 51
      • 2) 기업 경영성과의 조작적 정의 52
      • 3. 자료수집 방법 53
      • 4. 자료분석 방법 54
      • Ⅳ. 연구 결과 60
      • 1. 기업형태 분석결과 60
      • 2. 주요 변수의 기술적 분석 결과 61
      • 1) 연도별 매출액 추이 61
      • 2) 연도별 기부금 및 구성 추이 62
      • 3) 연도별 당기순이익 추이 66
      • 4) 연도별 매출액 대비 기부금 및 당기순이익 추이 67
      • 3. 기업 사회공헌과 경영성과의 쌍방관계 검증 69
      • 1) 쌍방관계에 대한 최종모형 구축 69
      • 2) 비표준화된 경로계수 검증 74
      • 3) 표준화된 경로계수 검증 80
      • 4) 가설 검증 83
      • 4. 연구의 시사점 85
      • Ⅴ. 결론 및 요약 86
      • 1. 결과 요약 86
      • 2. 향후 연구방향 제언 89
      • 참고문헌 91
      • Abstract 98
      • 저작물 이용허락서 101
      • 부록 102
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼