RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      보육시설 평가인증제도의 활성화를 위한 변인 = (The) variable for the availability of daycare center assessment accreditation system

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11379908

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The Assessment Accreditation System has improved our daycare center quality, but in daycare setting it is difficult to take Assessment Accreditation System. Thus the purpose of this study is to explore the variables for availability of daycare center Assessment Accreditation System.

      The Question of the study
      1. How does the daycare center director perceive the Assessment Accreditation System and Assessment Indicator?
      2. How does the daycare center director perceive the Assessment Accreditation observer activity?
      3. How does the daycare center director perceive the Assessment Accreditation assistance and Daycare Information Center?
      4. How does the daycare center director perceive the Assessment Accreditation incentive system?

      The questionaire was revised to be appropriate for my study by selecting useful items from' Daycare Center Assessment Accreditation Indicator' (Korea Women Development Center), 'The Basic Perception of Daycare Center Director for Assessment Accreditation System According to Daycare Center Type'(Ju Kyungjin, 2006) and 'The Perception of Daycere Center Director for Assessment Accreditation System'(Park Bokmae, 2005).
      SPSS 12.0 was used to analyze data for ANOVA-test, χ² and frequency.

      Results

      First, the perception of director for the Assessment Accreditation System and Assessment Indicator
      Regardless of the participation in Assessment Accreditation System, the directors scored that Assessment Accreditation System improved the quality of the daycare center and the most important thing is ' the accurate perception and knowledge about Assessment Accreditation System'. The frequency of appropriateness was high for Assessment Accreditation System object, process, point rate and expiry term. But it was reported that the charge of taking Assessment Accreditation System, having too many items, not considering the center type and region were inappropriate for daycare center director. A lot of documents were the most important factor for avoiding the Assessment Accreditation System.
      Second, the perception of director for the Assessment Accreditation Observer Activity
      The directors rated high for the observer's career as a daycare center teacher. According to prior study it is necessary for observers to take a observer training and have a correct perception and knowledge for daycare setting.
      Third, the perception of director for the Assessment Accreditation Assistance and Daycare Information Center
      The directors rated desirable assistance type is from Daycare Information Center. Current assistance workers of Daycare Information Center were not enough to give a hand all of the Assessment Accreditation centers.
      Fourth, the perception of director for the Assessment Accreditation Incentive System
      In incentive system the directors wanted to be paid the facility reform fee and teachers' overtime pay, to reflect the guidance and inspection of administrative officer and to relate with incentive point at committing agency again.
      Thus the variables of availability of Assessment Accreditation were the education for daycare center workers, reliable Indicator, the rationalization of System, the reliability and understanding of observer, assistance for care center setting and policy assistance.
      번역하기

      The Assessment Accreditation System has improved our daycare center quality, but in daycare setting it is difficult to take Assessment Accreditation System. Thus the purpose of this study is to explore the variables for availability of daycare center...

      The Assessment Accreditation System has improved our daycare center quality, but in daycare setting it is difficult to take Assessment Accreditation System. Thus the purpose of this study is to explore the variables for availability of daycare center Assessment Accreditation System.

      The Question of the study
      1. How does the daycare center director perceive the Assessment Accreditation System and Assessment Indicator?
      2. How does the daycare center director perceive the Assessment Accreditation observer activity?
      3. How does the daycare center director perceive the Assessment Accreditation assistance and Daycare Information Center?
      4. How does the daycare center director perceive the Assessment Accreditation incentive system?

      The questionaire was revised to be appropriate for my study by selecting useful items from' Daycare Center Assessment Accreditation Indicator' (Korea Women Development Center), 'The Basic Perception of Daycare Center Director for Assessment Accreditation System According to Daycare Center Type'(Ju Kyungjin, 2006) and 'The Perception of Daycere Center Director for Assessment Accreditation System'(Park Bokmae, 2005).
      SPSS 12.0 was used to analyze data for ANOVA-test, χ² and frequency.

      Results

      First, the perception of director for the Assessment Accreditation System and Assessment Indicator
      Regardless of the participation in Assessment Accreditation System, the directors scored that Assessment Accreditation System improved the quality of the daycare center and the most important thing is ' the accurate perception and knowledge about Assessment Accreditation System'. The frequency of appropriateness was high for Assessment Accreditation System object, process, point rate and expiry term. But it was reported that the charge of taking Assessment Accreditation System, having too many items, not considering the center type and region were inappropriate for daycare center director. A lot of documents were the most important factor for avoiding the Assessment Accreditation System.
      Second, the perception of director for the Assessment Accreditation Observer Activity
      The directors rated high for the observer's career as a daycare center teacher. According to prior study it is necessary for observers to take a observer training and have a correct perception and knowledge for daycare setting.
      Third, the perception of director for the Assessment Accreditation Assistance and Daycare Information Center
      The directors rated desirable assistance type is from Daycare Information Center. Current assistance workers of Daycare Information Center were not enough to give a hand all of the Assessment Accreditation centers.
      Fourth, the perception of director for the Assessment Accreditation Incentive System
      In incentive system the directors wanted to be paid the facility reform fee and teachers' overtime pay, to reflect the guidance and inspection of administrative officer and to relate with incentive point at committing agency again.
      Thus the variables of availability of Assessment Accreditation were the education for daycare center workers, reliable Indicator, the rationalization of System, the reliability and understanding of observer, assistance for care center setting and policy assistance.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 7
      • 1. 우리나라 보육사업의 발전과정 7
      • 2. 외국의 평가인증 제도 17
      • 1) 호주의 평가인증제도 17
      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 7
      • 1. 우리나라 보육사업의 발전과정 7
      • 2. 외국의 평가인증 제도 17
      • 1) 호주의 평가인증제도 17
      • 2) 미국의 평가인증제도 21
      • 3. 우리나라의 평가인증 제도 24
      • 1) 보육시설 평가인증제도의 필요성 및 목적 24
      • 2) 평가인증 추진 전략 25
      • 3) 보육시설 평가인증 과정 30
      • 4) 보육시설 평가인증 지표의 기본 방향과 구성 37
      • Ⅲ. 연구방법 44
      • 1. 연구대상 44
      • 2. 연구도구 46
      • 3. 자료수집 및 절차 48
      • 4. 자료 분석 48
      • Ⅳ. 연구결과 및 해석 49
      • 1. 연구문제 1의 결과 49
      • 2. 연구문제 2의 결과 63
      • 3. 연구문제 3의 결과 69
      • 4. 연구문제 4의 결과 74
      • Ⅴ. 논의 및 결론 79
      • 참고문헌 90
      • 부 록 94
      • ABSTRACT104
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼