RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      PAI에 나타난 비행청소년의 심리사회적 특성

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11347769

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of the present study was to elucidate the psychosocial characteristics of juvenile offenders indexed by the Personality Assessment Inventory(PAI) and Risk Assessment Tool(RAT). Experiment group were recruited from juvenile offenders under police investigation, ages 12-19 (n=202). Number of age matched normal control group was 65. All participants lived at Gyeongnam and Jeonnam regions.
      PAI's scales and RAT's factors in the control group were compared with those in the experimental group, and PAI's scales were clustered to create an offender typology of the juvenile offenders.
      The scales of inconsistency(ICN), infrequency(INF), somatic complaints(SOM), depression(DEP), borderline features(BOR), antisocial features(ANT), alcohol problems(ALC), aggression(AGG), stress(STR) in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group. Also the sub-scales of health concerns(SOM-H), affective anxiety(ANX-A), cognitive depression(DEP-C), physiological depression(DEP-P), activity level(MAN-A), persecution(PAR-P), affective instability(BOR-A), self-harm(BOR-S), antisocial behaviors(ANT-A), egocentricity(ANT-E), stimulus-seeking(ANT-S), aggressive attitude(AGG-A), verbal aggression(AGG-V), physical aggression(AGG-P) in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group. All of the six scores of Risk Assessment Tool in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group.
      Further, the data revealed that the offender characteristics of the experimental group were sub-divided by their personality patterns: cluster 1 was a mild antisocial and aggressive group who had mania features and rich interpersonal relationship, cluster 2 was an highly antisocial and aggressive group who had depression and borderline features, cluster 3 was a normal antisocial and mild aggressive group who had mild depression and poor interpersonal relationship, cluster 4 was a normal group.
      The predicted factors of delinquency act based on 10 PAI scales were high antisocial(ANT), alcohol problems(ALC), depression(DEP) and low anxiety(ANX). The equation of regression was as follows.
      delinquency act(Y) = ‒12.845***+ 0.187***(ANT) + 0.110**(ALC)
      + 0.170***(DEP) ‒ 0.111**(ANX)
      Implications, limitations of the present study and suggestions for the further investigation were also discussed.
      번역하기

      The purpose of the present study was to elucidate the psychosocial characteristics of juvenile offenders indexed by the Personality Assessment Inventory(PAI) and Risk Assessment Tool(RAT). Experiment group were recruited from juvenile offenders under ...

      The purpose of the present study was to elucidate the psychosocial characteristics of juvenile offenders indexed by the Personality Assessment Inventory(PAI) and Risk Assessment Tool(RAT). Experiment group were recruited from juvenile offenders under police investigation, ages 12-19 (n=202). Number of age matched normal control group was 65. All participants lived at Gyeongnam and Jeonnam regions.
      PAI's scales and RAT's factors in the control group were compared with those in the experimental group, and PAI's scales were clustered to create an offender typology of the juvenile offenders.
      The scales of inconsistency(ICN), infrequency(INF), somatic complaints(SOM), depression(DEP), borderline features(BOR), antisocial features(ANT), alcohol problems(ALC), aggression(AGG), stress(STR) in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group. Also the sub-scales of health concerns(SOM-H), affective anxiety(ANX-A), cognitive depression(DEP-C), physiological depression(DEP-P), activity level(MAN-A), persecution(PAR-P), affective instability(BOR-A), self-harm(BOR-S), antisocial behaviors(ANT-A), egocentricity(ANT-E), stimulus-seeking(ANT-S), aggressive attitude(AGG-A), verbal aggression(AGG-V), physical aggression(AGG-P) in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group. All of the six scores of Risk Assessment Tool in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group.
      Further, the data revealed that the offender characteristics of the experimental group were sub-divided by their personality patterns: cluster 1 was a mild antisocial and aggressive group who had mania features and rich interpersonal relationship, cluster 2 was an highly antisocial and aggressive group who had depression and borderline features, cluster 3 was a normal antisocial and mild aggressive group who had mild depression and poor interpersonal relationship, cluster 4 was a normal group.
      The predicted factors of delinquency act based on 10 PAI scales were high antisocial(ANT), alcohol problems(ALC), depression(DEP) and low anxiety(ANX). The equation of regression was as follows.
      delinquency act(Y) = ‒12.845***+ 0.187***(ANT) + 0.110**(ALC)
      + 0.170***(DEP) ‒ 0.111**(ANX)
      Implications, limitations of the present study and suggestions for the further investigation were also discussed.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 = 3
      • 3. 연구배경 = 3
      • 1) 비행, 청소년비행, 비행청소년의 개념 = 3
      • I. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 = 3
      • 3. 연구배경 = 3
      • 1) 비행, 청소년비행, 비행청소년의 개념 = 3
      • 2) 비행청소년의 성격특성 및 재비행 위험성 평가 = 7
      • II. 연구 방법 = 14
      • 1. 참여자 = 14
      • 2. 측정도구 = 15
      • 1) 성격평가질문지 = 15
      • 2) 비행촉발요인조사 = 16
      • 3. 연구절차 = 18
      • 4. 분석방법 = 19
      • III. 연구결과 = 20
      • 1. 비행청소년과 일반청소년의 PAI 척도의 평균비교 = 20
      • 1) 22개 척도의 평균비교 = 20
      • 2) 하위척도의 평균비교 = 22
      • 2. 비행청소년과 일반청소년의 비행촉발요인 비교 = 25
      • 3. 비행청소년의 범죄유형별 PAI 척도 차이비교 = 27
      • 4. 비행청소년의 범죄유형별 비행촉발요인 차이비교 = 27
      • 5. 비행청소년의 군집별 PAI 특성 및 비행촉발요인의 비교 = 28
      • 1) 군집 1의 특성 = 29
      • 2) 군집 2의 특성 = 30
      • 3) 군집 3의 특성 = 31
      • 4) 군집 4의 특성 = 32
      • 6. 비행을 유의하게 예측하는 PAI 척도 탐색 = 40
      • IV. 논의 = 41
      • 참고문헌 = 46
      • 부록 = 51
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼