RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    초등학생의 자기평가가 메타인지와 학업성취도에 미치는 효과

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11292958

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      대구: 대구교육대학교 교육대학원, 2007

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(석사) -- 대구교육대학교 교육대학원 , 교육방법전공 , 2007. 8

    • 발행연도

      2007

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • DDC

      371.26

    • 발행국(도시)

      대구

    • 형태사항

      ii, 61p.: 삽도; 26cm

    • 소장기관
      • 대구교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 부산교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the self-assessment on metacognition and academic achievement of elementary students. The specific research problems of interest in this study were as follows:
    First, is there any difference between self-assessment activities group and control group on metacognition?
    Second, is there any difference between self-assessment activities group and control group on academic achievement?
    Third, is there any correlation between metacognition and academic achievement?
    The main hypothesis tested were as follows:
    (1) The group of self-assessment activities would be higher than the group of non-self-assessment activities on metacognition.
    (2) The group of self-assessment activities would be higher than the group of non-self-assessment activities on academic achievement.
    (3) There would be significant correlation between metacognition and academic achievement.
    The subjects in this study were 64 fifth-grade elementary students. They were assigned equally to experimental and control group. Experimental group had an experience on self-assessment activities for 8 weeks. Control group had a non-self-assessment during that period.
    The experimental instruments used in this study were the prior scores of basic metacognition and academic achievement test to verify group homogeneity, the after test of metacognition and academic achievement to identify the treatment effects. The dependent variable was the scores of metacognition and academic achievement. The self-assessment activities were applied to test the effects of treatment concentrating on social studies in the fifth grade elementary students.
    The experimental design of this study was pre and post test experimental -control group design. T-test was applied to test differences of pre and post test scores in two groups using SPSS Win 12.0. The significance level was 5%. The main findings obtained from the results and discussion of this study were as follows:
    (1) The group of self-assessment activities was higher than the group of non-self-assessment activities on metacognition.
    (2) The group of self-assessment activities was higher than the group of non-self-assessment activities on academic achievement.
    (3) There was significant correlation between metacognition and academic achievement.
    Consequently, it revealed that self-assessment activities were more effective than the non-self-assessment academic activities on metacognition and academic achievement.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the self-assessment on metacognition and academic achievement of elementary students. The specific research problems of interest in this study were as follows: First, is there any difference...

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the self-assessment on metacognition and academic achievement of elementary students. The specific research problems of interest in this study were as follows:
    First, is there any difference between self-assessment activities group and control group on metacognition?
    Second, is there any difference between self-assessment activities group and control group on academic achievement?
    Third, is there any correlation between metacognition and academic achievement?
    The main hypothesis tested were as follows:
    (1) The group of self-assessment activities would be higher than the group of non-self-assessment activities on metacognition.
    (2) The group of self-assessment activities would be higher than the group of non-self-assessment activities on academic achievement.
    (3) There would be significant correlation between metacognition and academic achievement.
    The subjects in this study were 64 fifth-grade elementary students. They were assigned equally to experimental and control group. Experimental group had an experience on self-assessment activities for 8 weeks. Control group had a non-self-assessment during that period.
    The experimental instruments used in this study were the prior scores of basic metacognition and academic achievement test to verify group homogeneity, the after test of metacognition and academic achievement to identify the treatment effects. The dependent variable was the scores of metacognition and academic achievement. The self-assessment activities were applied to test the effects of treatment concentrating on social studies in the fifth grade elementary students.
    The experimental design of this study was pre and post test experimental -control group design. T-test was applied to test differences of pre and post test scores in two groups using SPSS Win 12.0. The significance level was 5%. The main findings obtained from the results and discussion of this study were as follows:
    (1) The group of self-assessment activities was higher than the group of non-self-assessment activities on metacognition.
    (2) The group of self-assessment activities was higher than the group of non-self-assessment activities on academic achievement.
    (3) There was significant correlation between metacognition and academic achievement.
    Consequently, it revealed that self-assessment activities were more effective than the non-self-assessment academic activities on metacognition and academic achievement.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성과 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구 문제와 가설 = 4
    • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 4
    • 4. 용어의 정의 = 5
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성과 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구 문제와 가설 = 4
    • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 4
    • 4. 용어의 정의 = 5
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 6
    • 1. 수행평가 = 6
    • 2. 자기평가 = 16
    • 3. 메타인지 = 26
    • Ⅲ. 연구 방법 = 34
    • 1. 연구 대상 = 34
    • 2. 실험 설계 = 34
    • 3. 실험 도구 = 35
    • 4. 연구 절차 = 36
    • 5. 자료 분석 = 41
    • Ⅳ. 결과 및 논의 = 42
    • 1. 결과 = 42
    • 2. 논의 = 44
    • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 = 48
    • 참고문헌 = 50
    • 영문 초록 = 53
    • <부록1> 자기평가지 ② = 55
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼