RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    야구동호인의 여가만족도와 생활만족도 분석 = The Analysis of the Baseball Club member Leisure-Satisfaction and Life-Satisfaction

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11218249

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper was analyzed by the Baseball Club to know the influential affect to the satisfaction of the person's leisure time and lifestyles. Also, it is to analysis the motivation in participation level of individual's and other specific groups to understand the difference of each groups. The research was done by a phone and the test subjects were 400 members of Baseball Club in Pusan, Korea. For, Cronbach's α method was used to confirm the survey which was used to calculate the reliability, Varimax was used to analysis primary cause by orhtogonal rotation to scrutinize the sufficiency of the tools used for the survey.
    By summarizing the outcome of the research process above the following will be equivalent to the list below.
    1) Analisis of Leisure Satisfaction by Participant's characteristic
    (1) In the age groups of 30, 31~35, and 36, 36 was the age group overall satisfied and overall withdrawing from stress.
    (2) There wasn't a significant differences between the satisfactory ratio of married and unmarried groups of participants.
    (3) College graduates and anyone above that seemed to be more satisfied than those who are anything high school graduates.
    (4) There wasn't a significant differences due to the movements/ mobility it takes in certain occupations, for instance participants who are more active in their work seemed to be more satisfied significant.
    (5) Participants who earned more than three million won, were more satisfied than other participants.
    (6) The participant's satisfactory level kept increasing same as the numbers of the trips taken to the Baseball Park.
    2) Analysis of Leisure satifaction by Participants degree
    (1) Due to the research, participants with more active life is more satisfied than those who does not.
    (2) Participants who contribute a appropriate time into their activities. It shows a high level of satisfaction level in their numbers. For, instance the Baseball Associations has a game, once a week and results of the survey recommended 3 to 4 times of participation.
    3) As a result of correlation analysis, the each variables are sifnifieantiy related.
    4) As a result of multiple regression the social-education and environment satisfaction fator has positively influenced upon the life satisfaction.
    번역하기

    This paper was analyzed by the Baseball Club to know the influential affect to the satisfaction of the person's leisure time and lifestyles. Also, it is to analysis the motivation in participation level of individual's and other specific groups to und...

    This paper was analyzed by the Baseball Club to know the influential affect to the satisfaction of the person's leisure time and lifestyles. Also, it is to analysis the motivation in participation level of individual's and other specific groups to understand the difference of each groups. The research was done by a phone and the test subjects were 400 members of Baseball Club in Pusan, Korea. For, Cronbach's α method was used to confirm the survey which was used to calculate the reliability, Varimax was used to analysis primary cause by orhtogonal rotation to scrutinize the sufficiency of the tools used for the survey.
    By summarizing the outcome of the research process above the following will be equivalent to the list below.
    1) Analisis of Leisure Satisfaction by Participant's characteristic
    (1) In the age groups of 30, 31~35, and 36, 36 was the age group overall satisfied and overall withdrawing from stress.
    (2) There wasn't a significant differences between the satisfactory ratio of married and unmarried groups of participants.
    (3) College graduates and anyone above that seemed to be more satisfied than those who are anything high school graduates.
    (4) There wasn't a significant differences due to the movements/ mobility it takes in certain occupations, for instance participants who are more active in their work seemed to be more satisfied significant.
    (5) Participants who earned more than three million won, were more satisfied than other participants.
    (6) The participant's satisfactory level kept increasing same as the numbers of the trips taken to the Baseball Park.
    2) Analysis of Leisure satifaction by Participants degree
    (1) Due to the research, participants with more active life is more satisfied than those who does not.
    (2) Participants who contribute a appropriate time into their activities. It shows a high level of satisfaction level in their numbers. For, instance the Baseball Associations has a game, once a week and results of the survey recommended 3 to 4 times of participation.
    3) As a result of correlation analysis, the each variables are sifnifieantiy related.
    4) As a result of multiple regression the social-education and environment satisfaction fator has positively influenced upon the life satisfaction.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구 문제 = 4
    • 3. 연구 가설 = 5
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 6
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구 문제 = 4
    • 3. 연구 가설 = 5
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 6
    • 1. 야구의 유래 = 6
    • 2. 한국 야구의 유래 = 7
    • 3. 사회인 야구의 유래 = 8
    • 1) 사회인 야구의 기원 = 8
    • 2) 사회인 야구의 특성 = 8
    • 3) 사회인 야구의 규칙 = 9
    • 4. 여가의 개념 = 14
    • 1) 여가의 어원 = 14
    • 2) 여가의 정의 = 15
    • 3) 여가의 기능 = 20
    • 5. 여가만족도 = 22
    • 6. 생활 만족도 = 24
    • 1) 생활 만족도의 개념 = 24
    • 2) 생활만족도 이론 = 26
    • 3) 생활만족에 영향을 미치는 요인 = 28
    • 4) 생활만족에 관한 선행연구 = 30
    • Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 32
    • 1. 연구대상 = 32
    • 2. 측정도구 = 33
    • 1) 기초특성변인 측정도구 = 33
    • 2) 설문지 구성 및 내용 = 34
    • 3) 여가 만족도와 생활 만족도 질문지 = 35
    • 3. 검사도구의 타당도와 신뢰도 = 36
    • 1) 설문지의 신뢰도 = 36
    • 2) 여가만족의 탐색적 요인분석 = 37
    • 3) 생활만족의 탐색적 요인분석 = 39
    • 4. 연구절차 = 40
    • 5. 조사절차 = 41
    • 6. 자료처리 방법 = 41
    • Ⅳ. 연구 결과 = 43
    • 1. 연구결과 = 43
    • 1) 특성변인별 여가만족도 차이 = 43
    • 2) 참가정도별 여가만족도의 차이 = 50
    • 3) 여가만족도와 생활만족도의 상관관계 = 52
    • 4) 여가만족도와 생활만족도의 영향관계 = 53
    • Ⅴ. 논의 = 55
    • 1. 참가자의 개인특성별 여가만족도 요인 분석 = 55
    • 1) 연령별에 따른 여가만족도 요인 = 55
    • 2) 결혼·유무별 여가만족도 요인 = 56
    • 3) 학력에 따른 여가만족도 요인 = 56
    • 4) 직업에 따른 여가만족도 요인 = 57
    • 5) 월 소득별 여가만족도 요인 = 57
    • 6) 프로야구 시즌 중 구장방문 횟수별 여가만족도 요인 = 58
    • 2. 참가정도별 여가만족도의 요인 분석 = 59
    • 1) 활동기간에 떠른 여가만족도 요인 분석 = 59
    • 2) 월별 활동에 따른 여가만족도 요인 = 60
    • 3. 여가만족도와 생활만족도의 상관관계 = 60
    • 4. 여가만족도와 생활만족도의 영향관계 = 61
    • Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 = 62
    • 1. 결론 = 62
    • 1) 참가자의 개인특성별 여가만족도 요인 분석 = 62
    • 2) 참가정도별 여가만족도 요인 분석 = 63
    • 2. 제언 = 64
    • 참고문헌 = 66
    • Abstract = 71
    • 부록 = 74
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼