RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    팀티칭에서 일어나는 상호작용 분석

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11101896

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      서울 : 서강대학교 교육대학원, 2007

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(석사) -- 서강대학교 교육대학원 , 교육대학원 , 2007. 8

    • 발행연도

      2007

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 발행국(도시)

      서울

    • 형태사항

      ; 26cm

    • 일반주기명

      지도교수 :박상기

    • 소장기관
      • 서강대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • The purpose of this study is to analyze whether or not the questions and tasks occurring through team-teaching interactions stimulate learners to further communication, and to use this information to design team-teaching more effectively.
    • In 2006, team-teaching open classes were held, in Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education, to improve classes by Communicative Approach and various language techniques. To achieve the suggested purpose, team-teachings from 5 middle schools were considered. Various topics and tasks were used, with analytical focus on questions and tasks.
    • Native teachers'' questions were examined, and learners'' reactions to the questions were analyzed. Korean teachers'' questions were excluded because the class was mostly led by a native teacher. Also, tasks were divided into , , and , and were analyzed in order to know if they stimulated and extended the communicative interaction among learners.
    • The result is as follows: First, teachers'' questions are usually asked in the introduction and consolidation step. Most questions in these steps were display questions to verify learners'' comprehension. There were little referential questions that required personal opinions and thoughts. Native teachers chiefly initiated speaking with WH-Question and Yes/No Question. Consequently, learners simply responded with a few words or Yes/No. They seldom responded with long sentences.
    • Second, there was little interaction among learners in the and . Communicative interaction among learners occurred in the , which consisted of pair and group works. Most tasks in pair work were controlled to promote the learning of expressions concerning specific topics. Depending on the native teacher, tasks in group work were controlled so as to induce learners to actively use English. Accordingly, we could identify that communication among learners was extended in the .
    • The purpose of this study is to analyze whether or not the questions and tasks occurring through team-teaching interactions stimulate learners to further communication, and to use this information to design team-teaching more effectively.
    • In 2006, team-teaching open classes were held, in Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education, to improve classes by Communicative Approach and various language techniques. To achieve the suggested purpose, team-teachings from 5 middle schools were considered. Various topics and tasks were used, with analytical focus on questions and tasks.
    • Native teachers'' questions were examined, and learners'' reactions to the questions were analyzed. Korean teachers'' questions were excluded because the class was mostly led by a native teacher. Also, tasks were divided into , , and , and were analyzed in order to know if they stimulated and extended the communicative interaction among learners.
    • The result is as follows: First, teachers'' questions are usually asked in the introduction and consolidation step. Most questions in these steps were display questions to verify learners'' comprehension. There were little referential questions that required personal opinions and thoughts. Native teachers chiefly initiated speaking with WH-Question and Yes/No Question. Consequently, learners simply responded with a few words or Yes/No. They seldom responded with long sentences.
    • Second, there was little interaction among learners in the and . Communicative interaction among learners occurred in the , which consisted of pair and group works. Most tasks in pair work were controlled to promote the learning of expressions concerning specific topics. Depending on the native teacher, tasks in group work were controlled so as to induce learners to actively use English. Accordingly, we could identify that communication among learners was extended in the .
    • In conclusion, teachers'' questions should be strategically asked to encourage learners to use English. Teachers have to use display questions and referential questions adequately, with consideration of the level and the learners, to stimulate learners to further communication. Also, when teachers think of tasks, they first need to analyze the task to see if it can stimulate interaction among the learners. That is to say, they should consider if the task can stimulate learners to further communication. Finally, team-teaching plays an important role in the EFL context as native teachers provide learners with good opportunities to use English. Thus, more studies should be done to develop team-teaching methods further.
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼