종교성 유형에 따른 삶의 만족, 행복감, 신념의 차이

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in life satisfaction, happiness and belief among types of religious orientation.
Hypotheses of this study were as follows. Hypothesis Ⅰ: They are some types of religious orientation according to combination of religious orientation dimensions.
Hypothesis Ⅰ-1: Religious orientation will be consist of 3 sub factors : intrinsic, extrinsic and quest dimension.
Hypothesis Ⅰ-2: They are several types of religious orientation according to combination of religious orientation dimensions.
Hypothesis Ⅱ: It will be expected that these groups have differences in personal religious life (tithes, frequency of church attendance, prayer behavior), belief (belief in the afterlife, death anxiety), personal happiness and satisfaction with life.
Hypothesis Ⅱ-1: Life Satisfaction would score higher on high intrinsic orientation.
Hypothesis Ⅱ-2: Death anxiety would score higher on high extrinsic orientation.
Hypothesis Ⅱ-3: Belief in the afterlife would score higher on high intrinsic orientation and high quest orientation.
Hypothesis Ⅱ-4: Happiness would score higher on high quest orientation.
Participants for this study were 413 (192 males and 221 females) Protestant adults. The average of their age was 31.84(SD=11.88). Data for this study were obtained from nation-wide survey. Questionnaires were given to 500 Protestant adults and 432 of were returned. 19 inefficient questionnaires discarded , then 413 of them were used for the final analyses.
The questionnaire was consist of 5 scales:
Religious Orientation(47 items), Oxford Happiness(29 items), Life Satisfaction (5 items), Belief in the Afterlife(10 items) and death anxiety(15 items). The construct validity of this questionnaire was tested by factor analysis. And for reliability coefficients of each subscale were calculated by Cronbach's coefficients. Collected data were analyzed using a SPSS 13.0 for Win. Statistical methods used for this study were Cluster Analysis and One way-ANOVA.
Main results of this study were as follows:
First, 4 types of religious orientation were obtained by combination of the religious dimensions. Thus HypothesisⅠ was supported.
Second, patterns of relationship between types and personal religion life, belief , personal happiness and satisfaction with life were different. Hypothesis Ⅱ was supported also.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서 론 1
• 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
• Ⅱ. 연구배경 5
• 1. Allport의 종교 성향 척도 5
• 1)미숙한, 성숙한 종교성: Allport의 초기 개념 5
• 2)외적인 성향 대 내적인 성향: Allport의 후기 개념 6
• 3)ROS의 한계 7
• 2. Batson의 개인적 종교의 차원 8
• 1)탐색적 차원 9
• 2)Batson과 Schoenrade, Ventis 의 세 차원 모델 10
• 3)Batson과 Schoenrade, Ventis 의 세 차원 모델의 의미와 적용결과 12
• 3. RLI-R (Revised Religious Life Inventory) 개발 13
• 4. 종교성 세 차원과 정신 건강(Mental Health)과의 관계 13
• 1)외적인(extrinsic), 수단 차원 13
• 2)내적인(intrinsic), 목적 차원 14
• 3)탐색적(quest)　차원 16
• 5. 종교 차원과 안녕감(Well-being)간의 관계 18
• 6. 국내연구 18
• 7. 가설 21
• Ⅲ. 연구방법 및 절차 22
• 1. 연구대상 22
• 2. 연구절차 23
• 3. 측정도구 24
• 1)종교성 척도 24
• 2)종속변수 24
• 3)인구통계학적 특성 25
• 4. 통계분석방법 27
• Ⅳ. 결 과 28
• 1. 종교성 차원 28
• 2. 종교성향에 따른 군집화 29
• 3. 종교성향에 따른 네 집단의 종속변수에서의 차이 35
• 1)행복 38
• 2)내세에 대한 믿음 39
• 3)죽음불안 39
• 4)삶의 만족 40
• 4. 종교성 집단에 따라 종교성 하위 척도 종속변수의 관련성 40
• 1)신앙중심·독실한 신앙인 집단 (1집단) 41
• 2)사유중심·신중한 신앙인 집단 (2집단) 42
• 3)자기중심·타협적인 신앙인 집단 (3집단) 43
• 4)신앙중심·관습적 신앙인 집단 (4집단) 44
• 5)종합요약 44
• 5. 종교생활에서의 차이 46
• Ⅳ. 논의 49
• 참고문헌 53
• 부록 63