RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    大都市 地域農協의 經營效率性 提高에 關한 硏究 = A Study on the Improvement of Managment Efficiency of the Primary Cooperatives in Metropolises of Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11055504

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The management bases of Metropolis Primary Agricultural Cooperatives (MPACs) have been largely not only threatened by drastic decrease of the agricultural population, but also the management conditions of the MRACs whose credit businesses are being concerned about decrease in profits of mutual finance are being rapidly changed by strengthened competition of opening capital market and the enlarged size of other financial institutions. Therefore, MPACs preferentially require objective and general evaluation for management achievement to cope with change of management environments although they have attempted various methods.
    In this investigation, we evaluated comprehensiveness and objective management performance of one hundred and two MPACs using models of DEA(Data Envelopment Analysis) and AHP(Analysis Hierarchy Process). With these evaluation and analysis, we determined not only the priority business orders for future direction of Regional Agricultural Cooperatives, but also suggested a direction to improve the inefficient MPACs.
    The research results are as follows:
    First, the average technical efficiency ratio of one hundred and two MPACs in 2005 is 86.2% while inefficiency ratio of the input side is 13.8%.
    Second, The influence of the technical efficiency on the management efficiency is much stronger than that of the scale efficiency.
    Third, the pure technical efficiency of the rural Agricultural Cooperatives is much higher than that of the urban Agricultural Cooperatives. The higher inefficiency of the urban Agricultural Cooperatives which do not accomplish economy of scale than that of the rural Agricultural Cooperatives meant that the urban Agricultural Cooperatives have much higher inefficiency. Also, excess investment problem for the input side is much more serious in the urban Agricultural Cooperatives than in the rural Agricultural Cooperatives
    Fourth, an officer prefers to extend business scale by focusing credit & mutual-aid business in determining MPACs future among MPACs' businesses while the representatives regard businesses closely related to regional specific character.
    번역하기

    The management bases of Metropolis Primary Agricultural Cooperatives (MPACs) have been largely not only threatened by drastic decrease of the agricultural population, but also the management conditions of the MRACs whose credit businesses are being co...

    The management bases of Metropolis Primary Agricultural Cooperatives (MPACs) have been largely not only threatened by drastic decrease of the agricultural population, but also the management conditions of the MRACs whose credit businesses are being concerned about decrease in profits of mutual finance are being rapidly changed by strengthened competition of opening capital market and the enlarged size of other financial institutions. Therefore, MPACs preferentially require objective and general evaluation for management achievement to cope with change of management environments although they have attempted various methods.
    In this investigation, we evaluated comprehensiveness and objective management performance of one hundred and two MPACs using models of DEA(Data Envelopment Analysis) and AHP(Analysis Hierarchy Process). With these evaluation and analysis, we determined not only the priority business orders for future direction of Regional Agricultural Cooperatives, but also suggested a direction to improve the inefficient MPACs.
    The research results are as follows:
    First, the average technical efficiency ratio of one hundred and two MPACs in 2005 is 86.2% while inefficiency ratio of the input side is 13.8%.
    Second, The influence of the technical efficiency on the management efficiency is much stronger than that of the scale efficiency.
    Third, the pure technical efficiency of the rural Agricultural Cooperatives is much higher than that of the urban Agricultural Cooperatives. The higher inefficiency of the urban Agricultural Cooperatives which do not accomplish economy of scale than that of the rural Agricultural Cooperatives meant that the urban Agricultural Cooperatives have much higher inefficiency. Also, excess investment problem for the input side is much more serious in the urban Agricultural Cooperatives than in the rural Agricultural Cooperatives
    Fourth, an officer prefers to extend business scale by focusing credit & mutual-aid business in determining MPACs future among MPACs' businesses while the representatives regard businesses closely related to regional specific character.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 제Ⅰ장 서론 1
    • 제 1 절 연구 필요성 1
    • 제 2 절 연구목적 3
    • 제 3 절 연구방법 및 구성 4
    • 제 4 절 선행연구의 고찰 7
    • 제Ⅰ장 서론 1
    • 제 1 절 연구 필요성 1
    • 제 2 절 연구목적 3
    • 제 3 절 연구방법 및 구성 4
    • 제 4 절 선행연구의 고찰 7
    • 1. DEA모형에 관한 선행연구 7
    • 가. 협동조합에 적용한 국외 연구 7
    • 나. 협동조합에 적용한 국내 연구 8
    • 2. AHP모형에 관한 선행연구 13
    • 3. 협동조합의 경영성과 및 평가에 관한 선행연구 14
    • 제Ⅱ장 지역농협 특성과 일반 현황 16
    • 제 1 절 지역농협 특성 16
    • 1. 협동조합의 일반적 특성 16
    • 2. 지역농협의 특성 18
    • 제 2 절 지역농협 현황 20
    • 1. 조직현황 20
    • 2. 지역농협 사업현황 25
    • 제 Ⅲ 장 효율성 개념과 분석모형 설정 30
    • 제 1 절 효율성의 개념 30
    • 1. 효율성의 개념 30
    • 2. 효율성에 관한 이론 33
    • 3. 농협경영과 효율성 39
    • 가. 기술효율성 39
    • 나. 규모효율성 40
    • 제 2 절 효율성 측정방법 41
    • 1. 모수적 접근법(parametric approach) 41
    • 가. 함수적 접근법(Functional Approach) 41
    • 나. 생산성 지수 접근법(Productivity Index Approach) 42
    • 다. 비율분석법(ratio analysis) 44
    • 2. 모수적 접근방법(parametric approach)의 한계점 45
    • 3. 분석 모형 46
    • 가. DEA모형의 기본이론 46
    • 나. DEA모형의 분석결과 53
    • 1) DEA모형의 쌍대모형 53
    • 2) 준거집합과 효율적 투입·산출 합성치 55
    • 다. DEA모형의 제 형태 60
    • 1) DEA/CCR모형 60
    • 2) DEA/BCC모형 61
    • 라. DEA모형의 표준속성 63
    • 1) 비교집합의 동질성 63
    • 2) 비교집합의 규모 64
    • 3) 상충관계의 고려 65
    • 마. DEA모형의 특성 및 유용성 65
    • 바. DEA모형의 적용상 한계점 68
    • 사. AHP분석기법의 개념 69
    • 1) AHP의 정의 69
    • 2) AHP의 적용절차 70
    • 제Ⅳ장 대도시 지역농협 경영효율성 분석 76
    • 제 1 절 분석절차 76
    • 제 2 절 DEA 실증분석 모형 76
    • 1. 농협의 잉여관계식 76
    • 2. 실증분석 모형 79
    • 제 3 절 분석결과 및 고찰 82
    • 1. 변수선정 82
    • 가. 산출변수 83
    • 나. 투입물 변수 85
    • 2. 분석결과 및 고찰 86
    • 가. 기초통계량 86
    • 나. 생산 효율성 분석결과 및 고찰 90
    • 다. 순수기술효율성과 규모효율성의 관계 99
    • 라. 입지유형별 효율성분석 101
    • 마. 비효율적 경영에 대한 개선목표 104
    • 제Ⅴ장 대도시 지역농협 관리직원·대의원 의식구조 107
    • 제 1 절 분석대상농협의 개요와 평가의 계층구조 107
    • 1. 분석대상 농협의 개요 107
    • 2. 평가의 계층구조 109
    • 제 2 절 분석결과와 고찰 112
    • 1. 종합평가 112
    • 2. 사업부문의 평가 115
    • 3. 사업내용의 평가 117
    • 4. 장래방향 관련 사업부문 및 부문별 사업내용 절대비교 결과 124
    • 제Ⅵ장 요약 및 결론 130
    • 참고문헌 135
    • ABSTRACT 147
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼