RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    초등학생의 사고양식, 학습양식 및 학업성취도와의 관계 = Relation of elementary students’thinking style, learning style, and academic achievements

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11007911

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examined the relation of elementary students' thinking style and learning style with their academic achievements according to gender, taking note of the fact that elementary students'learning style, which is preference for specific thinking process and learning method for acquiring knowledge, is different although other conditions such as time and place are the same. It is because individual learners'thinking style and learning style show their tendency of preferring specific strategies and applying them to learning situation and, furthermore, give understanding of their information processing procedure and clues for enhancing their academic achievement through improving their current learning process.
    This research was conducted with 210 male and female 4th, 5th and 6th grade students at an elementary school in Daejeon. Thinking style was measured using 65 questions in a validated short version of Thinking Styles Questionnaire translated by Mi-seon Yoon. The 13 sub styles of thinking were classified into Type Ⅰ and Type Ⅱ and their relations with learning style and academic achievement were examined.
    Learning style was measured using 36 questions in a questionnaire prepared by Myeong-hwa Tae through revising and complementing Student Learning Styles Questionnaire developed by Grasha Reichmann. The relations between six sub styles of learning and thinking styles were examined.
    According to the results of examining differences in learning style according to gender and thinking style, thinking style Type Ⅰ showed higher scores than Type Ⅱ in independent, cooperative, competitive and participative learning styles. This suggests that elementary students'thinking style is generally of creative Type Ⅰ with participative, cooperative and occasionally competitive learning styles.
    In addition, according to the results of examining the relation between thinking style and academic achievement, thinking style Type Ⅰ showed higher achievement than Type Ⅱ in male and female students'Korean language, male students'social studies and female students'science. This suggests that, as reported in previous researches, thinking style is generally in a significant correlation with academic achievement. Considering that academic achievement was evaluated using short answer and multiple choice questions in this study, more significant result is expected in each subject if various types of questions are used.
    Difference in academic achievement is caused not only by difference in abilities but also by difference in method or style preferred by learners in using their intelligence. Accordingly, the efficiency and effectiveness of learning can be improved by developing and applying teaching learning models in consideration of elementary students'thinking and learning style.
    In particular, learners'academic achievement may be affected negatively by any inconsistency among teaching style, the environment and contents of teaching and learning, evaluation method and learners'style. Thus, teaching learning designers need to understand the distribution of thinking and learning styles among the learner group and establish and execute teaching strategies considering the characteristics of different groups.
    Furthermore, when the teachers are aware of their own thinking, learning styles, helps students understand and adjust themselves to the styles, the students may attain high academic achievement through more effective learning.
    번역하기

    This study examined the relation of elementary students' thinking style and learning style with their academic achievements according to gender, taking note of the fact that elementary students'learning style, which is preference for specific thinking...

    This study examined the relation of elementary students' thinking style and learning style with their academic achievements according to gender, taking note of the fact that elementary students'learning style, which is preference for specific thinking process and learning method for acquiring knowledge, is different although other conditions such as time and place are the same. It is because individual learners'thinking style and learning style show their tendency of preferring specific strategies and applying them to learning situation and, furthermore, give understanding of their information processing procedure and clues for enhancing their academic achievement through improving their current learning process.
    This research was conducted with 210 male and female 4th, 5th and 6th grade students at an elementary school in Daejeon. Thinking style was measured using 65 questions in a validated short version of Thinking Styles Questionnaire translated by Mi-seon Yoon. The 13 sub styles of thinking were classified into Type Ⅰ and Type Ⅱ and their relations with learning style and academic achievement were examined.
    Learning style was measured using 36 questions in a questionnaire prepared by Myeong-hwa Tae through revising and complementing Student Learning Styles Questionnaire developed by Grasha Reichmann. The relations between six sub styles of learning and thinking styles were examined.
    According to the results of examining differences in learning style according to gender and thinking style, thinking style Type Ⅰ showed higher scores than Type Ⅱ in independent, cooperative, competitive and participative learning styles. This suggests that elementary students'thinking style is generally of creative Type Ⅰ with participative, cooperative and occasionally competitive learning styles.
    In addition, according to the results of examining the relation between thinking style and academic achievement, thinking style Type Ⅰ showed higher achievement than Type Ⅱ in male and female students'Korean language, male students'social studies and female students'science. This suggests that, as reported in previous researches, thinking style is generally in a significant correlation with academic achievement. Considering that academic achievement was evaluated using short answer and multiple choice questions in this study, more significant result is expected in each subject if various types of questions are used.
    Difference in academic achievement is caused not only by difference in abilities but also by difference in method or style preferred by learners in using their intelligence. Accordingly, the efficiency and effectiveness of learning can be improved by developing and applying teaching learning models in consideration of elementary students'thinking and learning style.
    In particular, learners'academic achievement may be affected negatively by any inconsistency among teaching style, the environment and contents of teaching and learning, evaluation method and learners'style. Thus, teaching learning designers need to understand the distribution of thinking and learning styles among the learner group and establish and execute teaching strategies considering the characteristics of different groups.
    Furthermore, when the teachers are aware of their own thinking, learning styles, helps students understand and adjust themselves to the styles, the students may attain high academic achievement through more effective learning.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차 = ⅰ
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • Ⅱ. 연구방법 = 23
    • 1. 연구대상 = 23
    • 2. 측정도구 = 23
    • 목차 = ⅰ
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • Ⅱ. 연구방법 = 23
    • 1. 연구대상 = 23
    • 2. 측정도구 = 23
    • 3. 분석 방법 = 27
    • Ⅲ. 결론 = 28
    • 1. 성별과 사고양식에 따른 학습양식의 차이분석 = 28
    • 2. 사고양식과 학업 성취도간의 관계 = 34
    • Ⅳ. 논의 = 40
    • 참고 문헌 = 44
    • ABSTRACT = 49
    • 부록 = 52
    • 부록 1. 사고양식 검사지 = 52
    • 부록 2. 학습양식 검사지 = 58
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼