This study was to examine the differences of their mental variation depending on their own roles, spectators, umpires, coaches and other factors in performances of 100 volleyball players in junior high and high school and in university and the results...
This study was to examine the differences of their mental variation depending on their own roles, spectators, umpires, coaches and other factors in performances of 100 volleyball players in junior high and high school and in university and the results were as follows;
Firstly, referring to the players' positive psychological consciousness, there were statistically significant differences between their scholastic abilities and the higher their scholastic ability, the more positive their psychological consciousness of their own roles. Secondly, Referring to their positive psychological consciousness and negative psychological consciousness of spectators, there were statistically significant differences between their scholastic abilities . While the psychological consciousness of professional players and players in university were more positive than players in junior high school and high school, layers in junior high school and high school were more negative than professional players and players in university. Thirdly, referring to their positive psychological consciousness of umpires, there were significant differences between their scholastic abilities. Players in junior high school expected the relationship with umpires and the good decisions of umpires comparing to players in high school and more higher scholar ship, who had many experiences. In addition, referring to their positive mental consciousness of umpires, there were statistically significant differences between their scholastic abilities and between their experiences.Fourthly, as the results of analysis about the differences of their positive and negative psychological consciousness of their coaches, there was no statistically significant difference between their scholastic abilities, between their experiences and between their positions. Fifthly, referring to their negative psychological consciousness of each factor, there were statistically significant differences between their scholastic abilities. Professional players considered the results of their them depending on their ability as more important, comparing to players in junior high school, high school and university. Their psychological consciousness of other players who did not match them and their team was high.
Generally, we could find that if professional players had higher their scholastic ability, there was more positive psychological consciousness of their own roles and if there were many spectators, the psychological consciousness of professional players was higher than players in junior high school, high school and university, and their psychological variation could be effected by the mobilization of spectators. In addition, as players in junior high school and high school had the negative psychological consciousness of umpires' decision, this study can prove the differences of metal variation between positions of professional players and players in junior high school, high school and university. Therefore, there are our requirements of the friendly relationship with spectators, umpires, coaches to enhance their performance and to be stable their psychological state and the development of mental programs and the systematic psychological training to control their impulse followed by their positions.