지방화시대 민군갈등의 특성변화와 관리전략에 관한 연구 = Study on characteristics changes of civil-military conflict and management strategies in age of localization

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The changes of social environments-localization and democratization -signified the extension of consciousness of individual right and the consciousness of right protection. As the violations of rights and conflicts of interest had been sensitive, the conflicts of interest between neighborhoods, local governments, other organizations and groups had been increased. Such social environment changes had given a considerable influence even on the civil-military conflicts and have led the sharp rise in the number of the conflicts in the 1900s. In particular, the conflicts including the operation, maintenance and management of system reform, military bases, and facilities started to be contemporary and the conflicts with respect to property rights, compensations, feeling and public harm as well as merits and exploits had sharply increased. Even the conflicts related to compensations, feeling, public harm, blows, violence, abuse of confidence, and professional misconduct had augmented until the mid 2000s. That is to say, the civil-military conflicts during the period between 1990s and 2000s which were potential under the oppression were mainly superficially expressed due to localization and democratization and most conflicts were directly and indirectly connected to administrative and systematic problems.
According to the analysis by types of conflicts, on one hand, ‘Guaranty Conflicts’ excessively restrict the property rights from the excessive setup of the military installation reservation. The military bases cause the invasion on the living environments including noise and dust accompanying military training programs, operational control in military actions and other additional activities and finally drop in the values of adjacent real estates. On the other hand, 'Compensation Conflicts' derive from the difference in views with respect to the compensation on environmental pollution, occupation without permission and use of private lands and the level of compensation. 'Correction conflicts' are related to the feeling of organizational members and arises from illegal actions, temporary emotional clash and so on while 'Recompense Conflicts' result from administrative treatment to find facts from systematic defectiveness and record inaccurateness and destruction by fire. In short, the guaranty conflicts arise from the elements in system and economy while the compensation conflicts link to environmental and economic problems. The correction conflicts and the recompense conflicts are caused by emotional problems and systematic and administrative ones, respectively. In conclusion, the conflict management strategies to settle or prevent the Korean civil-military conflicts should be established in the administrative, systematic, economic and environmental aspects to cure the root of the conflicts. Therefore, the settlement and prevention of the civil-military conflicts is to free from low formalization in a priority level. To be brief, the systems related to administrative procedures and regulations should be consistently supplemented and improved in consideration for the changes in the social and military operational environment and all the regulations and controls and other rules including the Act on the Protection of Military Installations should be reconsidered from the original concept.
As for the conservation of the environment, it is necessary to invest budgets and efforts into projects and programs including preservation and recovery of environment, and withdrawals of military bases and closed military bases left in mountains and fields nationwide or unfit for the concept of modern warfare which are connected to the execution of the Act on the Protection of Military Installations lest that the military forces should evaluate as a group separate from the conservation of the environment. Such visible efforts will give the military forces very positive influences on the operation and management.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차 = ⅰ
• 제1장 서론 = 1
• 제1절 연구 목적 = 1
• 제2절 연구범위 및 방법 = 2
• 1. 연구범위 = 2
• 2. 연구방법 = 3
• 제2장 갈등의 특성과 민군갈등의 유형 = 4
• 제1절 갈등의 개념과 갈등의 관리 = 4
• 1. 갈등의 특성 = 4
• 2. 갈등의 유형 = 18
• 3. 갈등의 관리 = 22
• 제2절 사회갈등구조변화와 민군갈등 = 26
• 1. 사회갈등구조의 형성과 변화 = 26
• 2. 사회갈등변화와 민군갈등의 관계 = 36
• 3. 민군갈등의 주체와 유형분류 = 46
• 제3절 분석틀 = 56
• 제3장 민군갈등의 특성과 변화추세 = 58
• 제1절 1985년-2004년 민군갈등의 개관 = 58
• 1. 민군갈등의 특성 = 58
• 2. 민군갈등의 변화추세 = 62
• 제2절 민군갈등 성격별 유형의 특성과 변화추세 = 65
• 1. 1985년-2004년 보장형 갈등의 특성과 변화추세 = 65
• 2. 1985년-2004년 보상형 갈등의 특성과 변화추세 = 74
• 3. 1985년-2004년 시정형 갈등의 특성과 변화추세 = 82
• 4. 1985년-2004년 보답형 갈등의 특성과 변화추세 = 91
• 제3절 민군갈등의 일반적인 추세와 유형별 특성 = 98
• 1. 민군갈등 유형별 분포 = 98
• 2. 민군갈등의 일반적인 추세 = 99
• 3. 민군갈등의 유형별 특성과 영향 = 100
• 제4장 민군갈등 사례분석 = 103
• 제1절 민군갈등 사례별 분석 = 103
• 1. 제주해군기지 건설추진 사례 = 103
• 2. 포항시오천읍소재 사격장 이전 요구사례 = 111
• 3. 경기도 강화군 진강산 종합훈련장 이전 요구사례 = 113
• 4. 진해군항 개방 요구사례 = 115
• 5. 군사시설보호구역 관련 사례 = 120
• 제2절 민군갈등사례 종합분석 = 125
• 1. 갈등사례별 갈등원인 종합분석 = 125
• 2. 갈등사례별 특성분석 = 127
• 3. 갈등사례별 갈등주체의 의식성향 = 128
• 제5장 민군갈등 관리전략 = 129
• 제1절 행정 및 제도적 전략 = 129
• 1. 지방자치권 확대에 따른 군의 역할조정 = 129
• 2. 새로운 차원에서의 군사보호구역 설정 = 131
• 3. 부대 운영 및 관리관련 갈등관리 = 134
• 제2절 경제적 전략 = 136
• 1. 군 기지건설 및 군사시설 입지 갈등관리 = 136
• 2. 군사시설 운영유지관리 갈등관리 = 137
• 제3절 환경적 전략 = 138
• 1. 사회 환경적인 갈등관리 = 138
• 2. 자연 환경관련 갈등관리 = 140
• 제6장 결론 = 142
• 참고문헌 = 146
• ABSTRACT = 153