RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    상사신뢰의 결정요인과 직무수행간의 구조적 관계 = (The)structural relationship on the determinants of subordinator's superior trust and jpb performances

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10812830

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      제주: 濟州大學校, 2007

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(박사) -- 濟州大學校 大學院 , 經營學科 , 2007

    • 발행연도

      2007

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • KDC

      325.3 판사항(4)

    • DDC

      658.3 판사항(21)

    • 발행국(도시)

      제주특별자치도

    • 형태사항

      vii, 107 p.; 30 cm

    • 일반주기명

      권말에 "설문지" 수록
      참고문헌: p. 91-102

    • 소장기관
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
      • 동양대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 제주대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study aims to verify the variables and how much they can explain the superior's trust not only on an individual characteristic of a leader and determinants of superior trust limited on the base of leadership but also expanding the leader's character and superior's emotional intelligence that can assess their ability, superior's considerate behaviors based on the leadership, and superior's sense of sense of justice.
    Also this study has the purpose to give useful information on practical work environment as choosing a job performance variable that is related to the productivity of organization as a result variable of superior's trust.
    This study performed the following four categories.
    The first category is to verify individual effect and discriminated effect on superior trust influenced by superior's emotional intelligence, sense of justice and considerate behavior which selected the determinants of superior's trust.
    The second category is to verify individual effect and discriminated effect on job performances(task performance, contextual performance, adaptive performance) in these superior's emotional(superior's emotional intelligence) and behavioral(superior's sense of justice and considerate behavior) variables.
    The third category is to verify the effect of superior trust on the job performances.
    The last category is to verify the mediator's effect of superior trust between the job performances and determinating factor.
    The results of this study are as follows.
    First, it has been proved that superior's emotional intelligence, sense of justice and considerate behavior all had positive influence on the superior trust. Especially dispersion rate which explains superior trust of these variables was highly ranked so it means that the dispersion rate needs to be considered as the determinants of superior trust.
    Also, in the factors of superior's sense of justice, it is confirmed that interactional sense of justice influences superior's trust more than distributive sense of justice and procedural sense of justice.
    Second, it has been proved that superior's emotional intelligence, sense of justice and considerate behavior give positive effect on job performances(task performance, contextual performance, adaptive performance). Especially these variables are all highly ranked about plausibility of contextual performance than any other task performance or adaptive performance. In the meantime, according to the result of analyzing the discriminated effect on the job performances of these variables, there are no sensible differences.
    Third, superior trust has a positive effect on the task performance, contextual performance and adaptive performance. Particularly, superior trust is highly influential to contextual performance than task performance and adaptive performance.
    Fourth, superior trust is partially related to superior's emotional intelligence, contextual performance and adaptive performance, and also it is fully interconnected to contextual performance and superior's sense of justice, superior's considerate behavior and contextual performance. However, it has been proved that between emotional intelligence and task performance, between sense of justice and task performance or adaptive performance, and between considerate behavior and task performance have no effect on each other.
    This study contains academic and practical suggestions on several levels.
    First, it confirms classification validity of task performance, contextual performance, adaptive performance with expanding job performance organization concept by multidimensional approach. It means organization members recognize the three performance concepts discriminately.
    Second, it confirms the variables that promote plausibility of superior trust. And it is clear that superior's sense of justice including his division, procedure, sense of justice of reciprocal action and superior's considerate behavior are important variables which determine the superior trust that has been recently researched as it has a huge influence on emotional worker's desire and job performance. In addition, the superior's considerate behavior is a critical variable on superior trust.
    Third, it gives useful information on practical affairs including job performance variable as a research model, a variable of organizational effectiveness, which is highly related to job result. This study indicates result with high application chances using job performance variable which is an active variable directly related to job result as organizational effectiveness.
    Fourth, it discovers that superior's emotional and active characters have powerful effect more than direct job performance(task performance) on job the performance (contextual performance, adaptive performance) besides roles. Especially the result of this study has more practical value in carrying out non-structured task companies under unstable environment than carrying out structured task under stable companies.
    번역하기

    This study aims to verify the variables and how much they can explain the superior's trust not only on an individual characteristic of a leader and determinants of superior trust limited on the base of leadership but also expanding the leader's charac...

    This study aims to verify the variables and how much they can explain the superior's trust not only on an individual characteristic of a leader and determinants of superior trust limited on the base of leadership but also expanding the leader's character and superior's emotional intelligence that can assess their ability, superior's considerate behaviors based on the leadership, and superior's sense of sense of justice.
    Also this study has the purpose to give useful information on practical work environment as choosing a job performance variable that is related to the productivity of organization as a result variable of superior's trust.
    This study performed the following four categories.
    The first category is to verify individual effect and discriminated effect on superior trust influenced by superior's emotional intelligence, sense of justice and considerate behavior which selected the determinants of superior's trust.
    The second category is to verify individual effect and discriminated effect on job performances(task performance, contextual performance, adaptive performance) in these superior's emotional(superior's emotional intelligence) and behavioral(superior's sense of justice and considerate behavior) variables.
    The third category is to verify the effect of superior trust on the job performances.
    The last category is to verify the mediator's effect of superior trust between the job performances and determinating factor.
    The results of this study are as follows.
    First, it has been proved that superior's emotional intelligence, sense of justice and considerate behavior all had positive influence on the superior trust. Especially dispersion rate which explains superior trust of these variables was highly ranked so it means that the dispersion rate needs to be considered as the determinants of superior trust.
    Also, in the factors of superior's sense of justice, it is confirmed that interactional sense of justice influences superior's trust more than distributive sense of justice and procedural sense of justice.
    Second, it has been proved that superior's emotional intelligence, sense of justice and considerate behavior give positive effect on job performances(task performance, contextual performance, adaptive performance). Especially these variables are all highly ranked about plausibility of contextual performance than any other task performance or adaptive performance. In the meantime, according to the result of analyzing the discriminated effect on the job performances of these variables, there are no sensible differences.
    Third, superior trust has a positive effect on the task performance, contextual performance and adaptive performance. Particularly, superior trust is highly influential to contextual performance than task performance and adaptive performance.
    Fourth, superior trust is partially related to superior's emotional intelligence, contextual performance and adaptive performance, and also it is fully interconnected to contextual performance and superior's sense of justice, superior's considerate behavior and contextual performance. However, it has been proved that between emotional intelligence and task performance, between sense of justice and task performance or adaptive performance, and between considerate behavior and task performance have no effect on each other.
    This study contains academic and practical suggestions on several levels.
    First, it confirms classification validity of task performance, contextual performance, adaptive performance with expanding job performance organization concept by multidimensional approach. It means organization members recognize the three performance concepts discriminately.
    Second, it confirms the variables that promote plausibility of superior trust. And it is clear that superior's sense of justice including his division, procedure, sense of justice of reciprocal action and superior's considerate behavior are important variables which determine the superior trust that has been recently researched as it has a huge influence on emotional worker's desire and job performance. In addition, the superior's considerate behavior is a critical variable on superior trust.
    Third, it gives useful information on practical affairs including job performance variable as a research model, a variable of organizational effectiveness, which is highly related to job result. This study indicates result with high application chances using job performance variable which is an active variable directly related to job result as organizational effectiveness.
    Fourth, it discovers that superior's emotional and active characters have powerful effect more than direct job performance(task performance) on job the performance (contextual performance, adaptive performance) besides roles. Especially the result of this study has more practical value in carrying out non-structured task companies under unstable environment than carrying out structured task under stable companies.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 제1절 연구배경 및 목적 = 1
    • 1. 연구배경 = 1
    • 2. 연구목적 = 2
    • 제2절 연구방법 및 내용 = 3
    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 제1절 연구배경 및 목적 = 1
    • 1. 연구배경 = 1
    • 2. 연구목적 = 2
    • 제2절 연구방법 및 내용 = 3
    • 1. 연구방법 = 3
    • 2. 연구내용 = 4
    • 제2장 이론적 배경 = 5
    • 제1절 상사신뢰 = 5
    • 1. 상사신뢰의 정의 = 5
    • 2. 신뢰의 기반 및 구성요소 = 8
    • 3. 상사신뢰의 기능 및 연구동향 = 14
    • 제2절 상사신뢰의 결정요인 = 18
    • 1. 상사의 정서지능 = 18
    • 2. 상사의 공정성 = 24
    • 3. 상사의 배려행동 = 34
    • 제3절 상사신뢰의 결과요인 = 36
    • 1. 과업수행 = 36
    • 2. 맥락수행 = 38
    • 3. 적응수행 = 43
    • 제3장 연구의 설계 = 47
    • 제1절 연구모형 및 연구가설 = 47
    • 1. 연구모형의 설계 = 47
    • 2. 연구가설의 설정 = 48
    • 제2절 변수의 정의 및 조사설계 = 56
    • 1. 변수의 정의 = 56
    • 2. 조사설계 = 58
    • 제4장 실증분석 = 60
    • 제1절 기초통계분석 = 60
    • 1. 표본의 특성 = 60
    • 2. 신뢰성 및 타당성 분석 = 61
    • 제2절 가설검증 = 67
    • 1. 상사신뢰의 결정요인 검증 = 67
    • 2. 상사의 정서적·행동적 변수와 직무수행간의 관계 검증 = 70
    • 3. 상사신뢰와 직무수행의 관계 검증 = 76
    • 4. 상사신뢰의 매개효과 검증 = 76
    • 5. 연구모형의 구조적 관계 = 80
    • 제5장 결론 = 86
    • 제1절 연구결과의 요약 및 시사점 = 86
    • 제2절 연구의 한계 및 향후 연구과제 = 89
    • 참고 문헌 = 91
    • 설문지 = 103
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1. The Leadership Triad, Zand, , 1997

    2. Business on ahandshake, Sheppard, Shaprio, Cheraskin, , 1992

    3. Emotional intelligence, Goleman, Daniel, Bantam Books, Emotional Intelligence, , 1996

    4. Trustworthy government, Carnevale, Trustworthy Government, , 1995

    5. 속도와 신뢰경영, 오등근, 이역성, , 2003

    6. Equity: Theory and Research, W.George, Walster, , 1978

    7. LISLEL 구조방정식 모델, 조선배, , 1996

    8. 자율과 존중의 리더십, 김명언, 박영석, 서용원, , 1997

    9. 리더십과 리더십 유효성, 강영순, 무역경영사, , 2002

    10. Can We Trust?, in D. Gambetta(eds.), Gambetta, "Can We Trust?, , 1988

    1. The Leadership Triad, Zand, , 1997

    2. Business on ahandshake, Sheppard, Shaprio, Cheraskin, , 1992

    3. Emotional intelligence, Goleman, Daniel, Bantam Books, Emotional Intelligence, , 1996

    4. Trustworthy government, Carnevale, Trustworthy Government, , 1995

    5. 속도와 신뢰경영, 오등근, 이역성, , 2003

    6. Equity: Theory and Research, W.George, Walster, , 1978

    7. LISLEL 구조방정식 모델, 조선배, , 1996

    8. 자율과 존중의 리더십, 김명언, 박영석, 서용원, , 1997

    9. 리더십과 리더십 유효성, 강영순, 무역경영사, , 2002

    10. Can We Trust?, in D. Gambetta(eds.), Gambetta, "Can We Trust?, , 1988

    11. Working with emotional intelligence, Goleman, Daniel, Bantam Books, , 1998

    12. 신뢰경영과 서번트 리더십, 이관응, 엘테크, , 2001

    13. Handbook of organizational measurement, Price, James L, Heath, Handbook of Organizational Measurement, , 1972

    14. 인과분석을 위한 연구방법론, 강병서, 무역경영사, , 2002

    15. 신뢰의 구성요인:탐색적 관찰, 문형구, 신뢰의 구성요인: 탐색적 관찰, , 1998

    16. A relational model of authority in group, Tyler, Lind, , 1992

    17. The social psychology of procedural justice, Lind, E. Allan, Plenum Press, The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, , 1988

    18. An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust, Roger, An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust, , 1995

    19. Building the emotional intelligence of group, Wolff, Druskat, , 2001

    20. Leadership and PerformanceBeyondExpectations, GultPublishing;B.M.Bass, , 1985

    21. Multivariate Data Analysis with Reading(4th ed), Black, Tatham, Anderson, Hair, , 1995

    22. Generalized Expectancies for Interpretation Trust, Rotter, , 1971

    23. Managerial Responsibilities and Procedural Justice, Bies, Folger, Managerial Responsibilities and Procedural Justice, , 1989

    24. 성공리더의 Fundamental 감성지능을 높여라, 김현기, , 2002

    25. Emotional intelligence : Why it can matter more than IQ, Goleman, D., Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ, , 1995

    26. Trust in organization: Frontiers of theory and research, Tyler.T.R, Kramer, , 1996

    27. 혁신행동의 선행요인에 관한 탐색적 연구, 이인석, , 1999

    28. Emotion in the workplace: The new challenge for managers, Dous, Ashkanasy, Emotion in the Workplace: The New Challenge for Managers, , 2002

    29. 상사에 대한 부하의 신뢰요인에 대한 연구, 김정호, 서용원, , 2000

    30. Adaptability in Workplace: Development of a Taxonomy of AP, Donovan, Plamondon, Pulakos, , 2000

    31. Emotions and leadership: The role of emotional intelligence, Goerge, , 2000

    32. Not So Different After All : A Cross-Discipline View of Trust, Sitkin, C.Camerer, R.S.Burt, Not So Different After All : A Cross-Discipline View of Trust, , 1998

    33. 성격의 5요인과 조직에서의 맥락수행간의 관계, 유태용, 김도영, 한국심리학회, "한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, , 2002

    34. 조직공정성, 신뢰, 조직유효성간의 관련성 연구, 이재훈, 최익봉, "조직공정성, , 2004

    35. Development and validation ofa measure of emotional intelligence, Schutte, , 1988

    36. Organizational citizenship behavior: It's nature and antecedents, Dienesch, Van Dyne, Organizational Citizenship Behavior: It's Nature and Antecedents, , 1994

    37. 조직 신뢰와 구성원 신뢰의 기반 요인 및 관계성, 임성만, 서울대학교 대학원, "박사학위논문, , 2004

    38. Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternative, in D. Gambetta(eds.), Luthmann, "Confidence, , 1998

    39. What is Emotional Intelligence. in P. Salovey and D. Sluyter(eds.), Mayer, Salovey.P, , 1997

    40. Lesson from the Top: The Search for American's Best Business Leaders, Critin, Neff, , 1999

    41. 절차공정성과 조직시민행동간 조직몰입의 매개효과, 송병식, 강영순, , 2001

    42. 기업의 세계화에 따른 경영관리상의 새로운 패러다임, 이인석, 박경규, 韓國人事管理學會, "인사관리연구, , 2000

    43. 다양한 직군에서의 성격의 5요인과 직무수행간의 관계, 유태용, 이도형, 광운대학교 기업경영연구소, "광운대학교 부설 기업경영 연구소: 기업경영 연구, , 1997

    44. The Role of Procedural andDistributive Justice in Organizational Behavior, Alexsander, Ruderman, The Role of Procedural and Distributive Justice in Organizational Behavior, , 1987

    45. Trust in Employee/employer Relationship: A Survey of West Michigan Manager, Mishra, Morrisey, , 1990

    46. Looking Fair vs. Being Fair: Managing Impression of Organizational Justices, Greenberg, , 1990

    47. 리더십 유형 및 리더에 대한 신뢰와 조직몰입의 관계 연구, 김형철, , 2001

    48. Explaining The Limited Effectiveness of Legalistic Remedies For Trust/Distrust, Sitkin, Roth N, Explaining the Limited Effectiveness of Legalistic Remedies for Trust/distrust, , 1993

    49. Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational setting, Conger, Toward a Behavioral Theory of Charismatic Leadership in Organizational Setting, , 1988

    50. The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory, Arthur, Sharmir, House, The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: A Self-concept Based Theory, , 1993

    51. Effects of Procedural and DistributiveJustice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions, Konovsky, Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions, , 1989

    52. Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance, Van Scotter, Motowildo, , 1994

    53. 적응수행에 대한 개인 및 팀 수준의 영향: 다수준접근법의 적용, 한태영, , 2005

    54. 한국기업조직에서 부하가 상사에 대해 갖는 신뢰와 불신의 기반, 이영석 ( Young Sok Lee ), 김명언 ( Myung Un Kim ), 한국심리학회, 한국기업조직에서 부하가 갖는 상사에 대한 신뢰와 불신의 기반, , 2000

    55. Modeling the Performance Prediction Problem in Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Compbell, , 1990

    56. 상사의 정서지능이 부하의 태도와 상사의 과업수행에 미치는 영향, 한지현, , 2005

    57. Driving fear out of the workplace : creating the high-trust, high-performance organization, Ryan, Kathleen, Jossey-Bass, "Driving Fear Out of the Workplace: Creating the High-trust, , 1998

    58. Manual for the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire-From ?:: An experimental revision, Stogdill, Manual for the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire-from ?: An Experimental Revision, , 1963

    59. The Development of Trust Influence and Expectations, in A.G. Athos, and J.J. Gabarro(eds.), Gabarro, "The Development of Trust Influence and Expectations, , 1987

    60. Determinants of Innovation Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace, R.A.Bruce, Scott, Determinants of Innovation Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace, , 1994

    61. Workplace justice and jobsatisfaction as predictors of satisfaction with union andmanagement, Fryxell, M.E.Gordon, Workplace Justice and Job Satisfaction as Predictors of Satisfaction with Union and Management, , 1989

    62. 조직공정성 및 상사-부하 교환관계의 질과 업적간의 관계에 관한 연구, 김기정, , 2000

    63. Affect and Cognition-based Trust as Foundations for interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations, Meyer Stanley, Affect and Cognition Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations, , 1995

    64. Emotional intelligence: A meta-analyticinvestigation of predictive validity and nomological net, Van Rooy, Viswesvaran, , 2004

    65. 리더의 임파워먼트 행위, 신뢰와 조직시민행동간의 관련성에 관한 연구, 이재훈, 최익봉, "리더의 임파워먼트 행위, , 2006

    66. Construct-oriented Biodata: Capturing Change-related and Contextually Relevant Future Performance, Allwoth, Hesketh, Construct-oriented Biodata: Capturing Change Related and Contextually Relevant Future Performance, , 1999

    67. Perceived Fairness of Employee DrugTesting as a Predictor of Employee Attitudes and Job Performance, R.Cropanzano, Konovsky, Perceived Fairness of Employee Drug Testing as A predictor of Employee Attitudes and Job Performance, , 1991

    68. TheEffectofleaderand followeremotional intelligence on performance and attitude: Anexploratorystudy, Wong, Law, , 2002

    69. Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust : Evolution of acondition of trust inventory, Butler, , 1991

    70. Whenathousandflowersbloom:Structural,collective,andsocial conditions for innovation in organization, Kanter, "When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, , 1988

    71. Trustin organizationalauthorities,the influence ofmotive attributions on willingness to acceptdecisions, P.DeGoey, Tyler, Trust in Organizational Authorities: The Influence of Motive Attributions on Willingness to Accept Decisions, , 1996

    72. Distributive and procedural justice aspredictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes, Sweeney, McFarlin, Distributive and Procedural Justice as Predictors of Satisfaction with Personal and Organizational Outcomes, , 1992

    73. Valuing Task and Contextual Performance; Experience, Job Roles, and Rating of the Importance of Job Behaviors, Hattrup, Befort, "Valuing Task and Contextual Performance; Experience, , 2003

    74. The Construct andCriterion Validity of Emotional Intelligence and its PotentialUtility for Managements Studies, Law, Song, The Construct and Criterion Validity of Emotional Intelligence and Its Potential Utility for Managements Studies, , 2004

    75. Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment on Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-role Behavior, Williams, S.E.Anderson, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment on Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-role Behavior, , 1991

    76. Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance, in N. Schmitt and W.C. Borman(eds.), Borman, Motowidlo, "Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance, , 1993

    77. Interactional Justice: Communication Criteria of Fairness. in R.J. Lewick, B.H. Sheppard, and M.H. Bazerman(eds.), Bies, Moag, "Interactional Justice: Communication Criteria of Fairness. in R.J. Lewick, , 1986

    78. 분배공정성과 절차공정성이 직무만족과 조직몰입에 미치는 차별적 영향에 관한 연구, 임준철, 윤정구, 한국경영학회, "경영학연구, , 1998

    79. Managers asInitiators of Trust: An Exchange Relationship Framework for UnderstandingManagerial Trustworthy Behavior, Susan E.Brodt, Whitner E.M, Werner J.M, , 1998

    80. Workers' evaluations of the "ends" and"means": An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice, McFarlin, Sweeney, , 1993

    81. An Empirical Examination of Leader-Member Exchange and Transformational Leadership as Predictor of Innovative Behavior, Basu, An Empirical Examination of Leader-member Exchange and Transformational Leadership as Predictor of Innovative Behavior, , 1991

    82. 부하의 과업수행, 맥락수행과 상사의 주관적 평가 간의 관계와 인상관리행동의 조절효과, 이경근, "부하의 과업수행, , 2005

    83. 의사결정참여 및 직업불안정성이 조직후원의식, 조직신뢰 및 역할 내 행동에 미치는 영향, 서재현, "의사결정참여 및 직업불안정성이 조직후원의식, , 2005

    84. The Impact of Perceived Organizational Support on the Relationship Between Boundary Spanner Role Stress and Work Outcome, Stamper C.L, Johlke, , 2003

    85. 분배 절차, 상호작용 공정성이 상사에 대한 신뢰, 조직지원인식 및조직시민행동에 미치는 영향, 정홍술, "분배?절차?상호작용공정성이 상사에 대한 신뢰, , 2002

    86. The Moderator-mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychology Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Consideration, Kenny, Baron, "The Moderator-mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychology Research: Conceptual, , 1986

    87. Procedural Justice in Performance Evaluation: The Role of Instrument and Non-instrument Voice in Performance Appraisal Discussions, Robertson, Korsgaard, , 1995

    88. 부하의 상급자 신뢰에 상급자의 행동특성과 능력, 사회적 유사성 및 교환관계 특성이 미치는 영향, 권석균, 한국경영학회, "부하의 상급자 신뢰에 상급자의 행동특성과 능력, , 2000

    89. 조직공정성이 조직후원의식에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 상사에 대한 신뢰의 매개역할을 중심으로, 서재현, , 2000

    90. Understanding Leader EmotionalIntelligence and Performance: The Role of Self-Other Agreement onTransformational Leadership Perception, Megerian, Sosik, Understanding Leader Emotional Intelligence and Performance: The Role of Self-other Agreement on Transformational Leadership Perception, , 1999

    91. 문제해결스타일, 리더와 멤버의 교환관계, 태도 및 경쟁압력에 대한 지각과 혁신적인 행동간의 관계, 백영미, 김성국, "문제해결스타일, , 2000

    92. 상호작용적공정성지각이 고과에 대한 태도에 미치는 영향: 3개의 연구를 통한 모형과 상황적 효과의 검증, 이경근, , 2002

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼