RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      초등학교 고학년용 자아탄력성 척도의 개발 및 타당화 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10807488

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        대구 : 대구교육대학교 교육대학원, 2007

      • 학위논문사항
      • 발행연도

        2007

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 주제어
      • KDC

        372.61

      • 발행국(도시)

        대구

      • 형태사항

        ii,39장 : 도표 ; 26cm.

      • 일반주기명

        참고문헌 : p.29-32

      • 소장기관
        • 대구교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 부산교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 서울교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 전주교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 한국교원대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this research was to develop and to validate the ego-resiliency scale for elementary upper grades.
      The research questions of this study were as follows:
      1. What factors are consisted with the ego-resiliency scale?
      2. What are the correlation among sub-factors of the scale?
      3. What are the internal consistency for total ego-resiliency scale and sub-factors scale?
      4. Does ego-resiliency scale validate in terms of concurrent validity and discriminant validity?
      First, this research established 12 factors (recognition, a problem solution strategy & meet of stress, personality stabilization, emotion expression, sympathy(personal relations, penetration, warm heart), self confidence, optimism, family relations, preference of challenge task, family relations, adaptable adaptation in the school. healthy relationship of the age, popularity․recognition) based on previous studies. 55 items were developed. Each items is 4 point Likert scale.
      Second, through the exploratory factor analysis 30 items with 7 factors (personal relations, family relations, optimism, popularity․recognition, personality stabilization, recognition, emotion expression) were confirmed as validated solution.

      Third, items of each factor were reorganized on the base of factor loading criteria.
      The range of Pearson?fs product-moment correlation coefficient of sub-factors were .12?`.50(p<.01).
      Internal consistency for the scale was appeared as .60?`.79. Total internal consistency was .84.
      Concurrent validity estimates were established through Pearson?fs product-moment correlation analyses with the Parent Form Ego-resiliency Scale of Yoon hyun-hee(1998) (r= .121?`.284, p<.05 or p<.01).
      Discriminant validity estimates were established through the t-test analyses between high group of 30 percent and low group of 30 percent that was divided by Stress Scale of Chon Min-pil(1993), Kim Kyoung-Sook(2005)(t=-10.783, p<.001) and School Adjustment Inventory of Song Mi-won(1999)(t=14.125, p<.001).
      Thorough these processes, the ego-resiliency scale for elementary school upper grade, that was the purpose of this research, was validated and developed.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this research was to develop and to validate the ego-resiliency scale for elementary upper grades. The research questions of this study were as follows: 1. What factors are consisted with the ego-resiliency scale? 2. What are the co...

      The purpose of this research was to develop and to validate the ego-resiliency scale for elementary upper grades.
      The research questions of this study were as follows:
      1. What factors are consisted with the ego-resiliency scale?
      2. What are the correlation among sub-factors of the scale?
      3. What are the internal consistency for total ego-resiliency scale and sub-factors scale?
      4. Does ego-resiliency scale validate in terms of concurrent validity and discriminant validity?
      First, this research established 12 factors (recognition, a problem solution strategy & meet of stress, personality stabilization, emotion expression, sympathy(personal relations, penetration, warm heart), self confidence, optimism, family relations, preference of challenge task, family relations, adaptable adaptation in the school. healthy relationship of the age, popularity․recognition) based on previous studies. 55 items were developed. Each items is 4 point Likert scale.
      Second, through the exploratory factor analysis 30 items with 7 factors (personal relations, family relations, optimism, popularity․recognition, personality stabilization, recognition, emotion expression) were confirmed as validated solution.

      Third, items of each factor were reorganized on the base of factor loading criteria.
      The range of Pearson?fs product-moment correlation coefficient of sub-factors were .12?`.50(p<.01).
      Internal consistency for the scale was appeared as .60?`.79. Total internal consistency was .84.
      Concurrent validity estimates were established through Pearson?fs product-moment correlation analyses with the Parent Form Ego-resiliency Scale of Yoon hyun-hee(1998) (r= .121?`.284, p<.05 or p<.01).
      Discriminant validity estimates were established through the t-test analyses between high group of 30 percent and low group of 30 percent that was divided by Stress Scale of Chon Min-pil(1993), Kim Kyoung-Sook(2005)(t=-10.783, p<.001) and School Adjustment Inventory of Song Mi-won(1999)(t=14.125, p<.001).
      Thorough these processes, the ego-resiliency scale for elementary school upper grade, that was the purpose of this research, was validated and developed.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서 론 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성과 목적 1
      • 2. 연구문제 3
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 5
      • 1. 자아탄력성의 개념 5
      • Ⅰ. 서 론 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성과 목적 1
      • 2. 연구문제 3
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 5
      • 1. 자아탄력성의 개념 5
      • 2. 자아탄력성의 구성 요소 6
      • 3. 자아탄력성과 관련된 선행 연구의 고찰 7
      • Ⅲ. 척도의 개발 9
      • 1. 측정요인의 선정 9
      • 2. 측정문항의 선정 11
      • 3. 예비검사 12
      • 4. 본검사 16
      • Ⅳ. 척도의 타당화 20
      • 1. 공인타당도 20
      • 2. 변별타당도 22
      • Ⅴ. 논의 및 결론 27
      • 참고문헌 29
      • 영문초록 33
      • 부 록 35
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼