As a community has its own culture, and each individual has their own personality, all the R&D institutes have their own unique cultural characteristics, namely the organizational culture. The purpose of this study is to compare the types of org...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10690292
부산: 부산대학교, 2006
학위논문(석사) -- 부산대학교 행정대학원 , 행정학과 , 2006년 8월
2006
한국어
352.35 판사항(21)
부산
vii, 117 p: 삽도; 26 cm.
부록 ; 설문지
참고문헌 : p.108-111
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
As a community has its own culture, and each individual has their own personality, all the R&D institutes have their own unique cultural characteristics, namely the organizational culture. The purpose of this study is to compare the types of org...
As a community has its own culture, and each individual has their own personality, all the R&D institutes have their own unique cultural characteristics, namely the organizational culture.
The purpose of this study is to compare the types of organizational culture between the public and the private R&D institutes to identify the effects of organizational culture on the organizational effectiveness. The Competing Value Approach by Quinn was applied to this study to clarify how the effectiveness of the organization is affected by four different types of cultures: Group, Hierarchical, Developmental, and Rational.
The total number of subjects was 312, who comprised of 4 public R&D and 6 private R&D institutes. The questionnaire composition was based on 5 point scale of Likert-type, and SPSSWIN program was utilized in statistical analysis.
The results of this study can be summarized to four parts:
First, this study found out that the public and the private R&D institutes show statistically meaningful differences in all cultural aspects except in developmental culture. Although group and hierarchical culture are weak in all the R&D institutes, the private R&D institutes are stronger than the public R&D institutes in all types of the organizational culture.
Second, in the public R&D institutes, group culture affected organizational commitment and job satisfaction whereas rational culture only affected job satisfaction. In the private R&D institutes, developmental and group culture affected organizational commitment and job satisfaction. But hierarchical culture affected neither organizational commitment nor job satisfaction in the entire R&D institutes.
Third, the proper communication system enforced group culture to affect organizational commitment and job satisfaction.
Finally, the irregular workers on the annual salary system whose R&D institutes are in group culture have a strong tendency on organizational commitment and job satisfaction.
목차 (Table of Contents)
로그인하고 관련된 다양한 학술자료를 확인해 보세요.
로그인