RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    사교육의 유형과 초등학생의 자기효능감, 자기조절학습력 및 학업성취도의 관계 = The Relation Between Type of Private Education and self-efficacy, self-regulatory efficacy, and learning accomplishment level on Elementary school students

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10673117

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      전주 : 전북대학교, 2006

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(석사) -- 전북대학교 , 교육학(교육심리) , 2006. 8

    • 발행연도

      2006

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • 발행국(도시)

      전북특별자치도

    • 형태사항

      55 ; 26 cm

    • 일반주기명

      지도교수: 박병기

    • 소장기관
      • 국립군산대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 전북대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study is mainly focusing on the effect of private education on self- efficacy, self-regulatory efficacy, and learning accomplishment level.
    The types of private education consist of academies, private tutoring, self-study workbook, and after school lesson.
    Learning attitude have self-efficacy of learning motivation and self-regulatory efficacy of learning ability.
    To find the effect of learning accomplishment level, the midterm grades of some students were used.
    1. Are there some differences between self-efficiency, self-regulatory, and learning accomplishment level as participating in private education?
    2. Are there differences between self-efficiency, self-regulatory and learning accomplishment level as the types of private education?
    To test the hypothesis of this study, 104 students of three classes in the third grade and 102 students of three classes in the sixth grade at D elementary school in Jeon-Ju were sampled.
    For confirmation of the study, the research was tested on the students.
    And "Standards of Self Efficiency";written by Park Byung Gi, Chae Sun Yung used to measure self-efficiency as the types of private education and subjects.
    "Compound Measure of Self-regulatory" written by Park Byung Gi, Jung Gi Soo, Kim Sun Mi and Lee Jong Ook were used to measure self-regulatory.
    Learning accomplishment level used the results of midterms that was tested at D elementary school in May 10th 2006.
    The result of this test are as follows;
    1. The result to find the difference in self-efficiency, self-regulatory efficacy and learning accomplishment level through t-test as participation of private education had almost no significant difference with regard to self-learning efficiency and participating-efficiency.
    There was also no significant difference with regard to self-regulatory efficacy that included in self-regulatory and action-regulatory.
    Also, in learning accomplishment level, the average of the students participating in private education are higher than others. So, there was a significant difference.
    2. To find the difference in self-efficiency, self regulatory efficacy and, learning accomplishment level as the types of private education, F-test was tested through classification of the groups.
    In result of the research, the type of private education had no significant difference with self-efficiency, self-regulatory efficacy and learning accomplishment level.
    In conclusion, participation and type of private education can't affect self-efficiency, self-regulatory efficacy and learning accomplishment level.
    번역하기

    This study is mainly focusing on the effect of private education on self- efficacy, self-regulatory efficacy, and learning accomplishment level. The types of private education consist of academies, private tutoring, self-study workbook, and after scho...

    This study is mainly focusing on the effect of private education on self- efficacy, self-regulatory efficacy, and learning accomplishment level.
    The types of private education consist of academies, private tutoring, self-study workbook, and after school lesson.
    Learning attitude have self-efficacy of learning motivation and self-regulatory efficacy of learning ability.
    To find the effect of learning accomplishment level, the midterm grades of some students were used.
    1. Are there some differences between self-efficiency, self-regulatory, and learning accomplishment level as participating in private education?
    2. Are there differences between self-efficiency, self-regulatory and learning accomplishment level as the types of private education?
    To test the hypothesis of this study, 104 students of three classes in the third grade and 102 students of three classes in the sixth grade at D elementary school in Jeon-Ju were sampled.
    For confirmation of the study, the research was tested on the students.
    And "Standards of Self Efficiency";written by Park Byung Gi, Chae Sun Yung used to measure self-efficiency as the types of private education and subjects.
    "Compound Measure of Self-regulatory" written by Park Byung Gi, Jung Gi Soo, Kim Sun Mi and Lee Jong Ook were used to measure self-regulatory.
    Learning accomplishment level used the results of midterms that was tested at D elementary school in May 10th 2006.
    The result of this test are as follows;
    1. The result to find the difference in self-efficiency, self-regulatory efficacy and learning accomplishment level through t-test as participation of private education had almost no significant difference with regard to self-learning efficiency and participating-efficiency.
    There was also no significant difference with regard to self-regulatory efficacy that included in self-regulatory and action-regulatory.
    Also, in learning accomplishment level, the average of the students participating in private education are higher than others. So, there was a significant difference.
    2. To find the difference in self-efficiency, self regulatory efficacy and, learning accomplishment level as the types of private education, F-test was tested through classification of the groups.
    In result of the research, the type of private education had no significant difference with self-efficiency, self-regulatory efficacy and learning accomplishment level.
    In conclusion, participation and type of private education can't affect self-efficiency, self-regulatory efficacy and learning accomplishment level.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 4
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 4
    • 2. 연구문제 = 6
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 8
    • 1. 사교육의 실태와 현황 = 8
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 4
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 4
    • 2. 연구문제 = 6
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 8
    • 1. 사교육의 실태와 현황 = 8
    • 2. 자기효능감(Self-Efficacy) = 19
    • 3. 자기조절학습력(Self-Regulaated Learning) = 21
    • 4. 학업성취 = 24
    • 5. 선행연구의 고찰 = 25
    • Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 28
    • 1. 연구 대상 = 28
    • 2. 측정도구 = 32
    • 3. 분석방법 = 34
    • Ⅳ. 결과 및 해석 = 35
    • 1. 사교육의 참여 여부에 따른 자기효능감, 자기조절학습력, 학업성취도의 차이 분석 = 35
    • 2. 사교육의 유형에 따른 자기효능감, 자기조절학습력, 학업성취도의 차이 = 37
    • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 = 41
    • 1. 결론 = 41
    • 2. 제언 = 42
    • 참고문헌 = 46
    • 부록 = 48
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼