條例에의 刑罰導入에 관한 硏究

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

With globalization and localization, local government strives to promote the convenience of citizens by making a creative policy which fits local specific characteristics. In this situation, it is necessary for local government to have strength to make policy and to practice it independently by having its own right. In a process of achieving a successful local autonomy, a lot of problems happened in a relation with the scope of ordinance legislation and the local autonomy acts.
The scope of ordinance legislation has been restricted due to the principle of unifying the government. The problem with this limitation of legislative power of local councils is becoming more important in an area of law theory and its practice. In a reality, it is true that the actual effectiveness of ordinance is becoming weak, and just the formal ordinance remains. Especially, local government just receives a fine by means of guaranteeing the formal administrative efficiency. Not only the problem of sentencing but also the high rate of nonpayment violate the constitutional ideology, and destroy the local government’s power. Furthermore, it makes the government not to perform effectively the policy of citizens’ welfare and public security. Also, the local government cannot prevent the increase of harmful facilities for juveniles.
Because of the introduction of local police system and the increase of regulating work, local government has been burdened in the local administration. It needs a reevaluation of the Article 15- the principle of 20 of local autonomy act. In order to improve citizen welfare and public security in the local area, it is necessary for the government to have a right to enact the punishment within the restricted scope. Through the extension of ordinance legislation, local government has the practical efficiency of administration. In conclusion, local government must have its own legislative power for the punishment in order to correct the problems which the central government cannot respond quickly.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 第1章 序論 = 1
• 第1節 硏究의 目的 = 1
• 第2節 硏究의 範圍와 方法 = 3
• 第2章 條例의 意義 = 4
• 第1節 條例의 槪念과 特徵 = 4
• 1. 自治立法權의 意義 = 4
• 2. 條例의 意義와 特徵 = 4
• 1) 條例의 意義 = 5
• 2) 條例의 特徵 = 6
• 가. 法規範性 = 6
• 나. 自主法性 = 7
• 다. 地域法性 = 8
• 第2節 條例의 機能과 條例制定權의 法的 性格 = 9
• 1. 條例의 機能 = 9
• 1) 創造的 立法機能 = 9
• 2) 法律先導的 機能 = 10
• 3) 法令補完的 機能 = 11
• 4) 現實適合的 調定機能 = 12
• 5) 人權保障 機能 = 12
• 2. 條例制定權의 法的 性格 = 13
• 1) 固有權說的 條例自主立法說 = 13
• 2) 傳來權說的 條例自主立法說 = 15
• 3) 條例委任立法說 = 16
• 4) 小結 = 16
• 第3節 外國의 立法例 = 19
• 1. 英國 = 19
• 1) 地方自治團體와 條例 = 19
• 2) 條例의 制定根據와 範圍 = 21
• 2. 美國 = 24
• 1) 地方自治團體와 條例 = 24
• 2) Dillon's Rule = 26
• 3) Home Rule = 28
• 4) 州 法律과 條例 = 32
• 3. 獨逸 = 34
• 1) 地方自治團體와 條例 = 34
• 2) 條例制定의 範圍 = 35
• 4. 日本 = 37
• 1) 地方自治團體와 條例 = 37
• 2) 條例制定의 範圍 = 39
• 5. 小結 = 42
• 1) 英美法系와 大陸法系 = 42
• 2) 聯邦國家와 單一國家 = 44
• 3) 示唆點 = 45
• 第3章 條例制定權의 範圍와 限界 = 47
• 第1節 法治主義와 條例 = 47
• 第2節 法律優位의 原則 = 50
• 1. 法律優位의 原則 = 50
• 2. 法律先占理論 = 52
• 1) 法律先占理論 = 52
• 2) 日本의 法律先占理論 = 53
• 가. 初期 法律先占理論 = 53
• 나. 明白性理論 = 54
• 다. 法令最低基準論 = 56
• 라. 公害規制 最低基準論 = 57
• 마. 自治事務 最低基準論 = 58
• 바. 規制限度法律·最低基準法律 = 59
• 3. 國法先占 및 國法空白分野와 條例 = 60
• 1) 國法空白分野와 條例 = 60
• 가. 國法空白分野에서의 條例 = 60
• 나. 國法廢止分野 = 61
• 다. 國法未備分野 = 62
• 2) 法令과 다른 目的의 條例 = 64
• 3) 超過條例와 追加條例 = 66
• 가. 超過條例와 追加條例의 意義 = 66
• 나. 超過條例와 追加條例의 必要性 = 66
• 다. 理論的 根據 = 68
• 라. 超過條例 및 追加條例에 대한 立法傾向과 判例 = 72
• 4) 小結 = 74
• 第3節 法律留保의 原則 = 75
• 1. 法律留保의 原則의 意義 = 75
• 2. 學說의 對立 = 78
• 1) 合憲說 = 78
• 2) 違憲論 = 80
• 3) 小結 = 83
• 第4章 條例에의 刑罰導入 = 89
• 第1節 現行法上 罰則規定 = 89
• 1. 罪刑法定主義와 條例 = 89
• 1) 罪刑法定主義의 意義 = 89
• 2) 法律主義와 條例 = 90
• 2. 過怠料 賦課 條例制定權 = 94
• 1) 地方自治法 第20條의 過怠料 = 94
• 2) 地方自治法 第130條의 過怠料 = 95
• 3. 現行制度의 問題點 = 95
• 第2節 外國에 있어 條例와 刑罰 = 98
• 1. 美國 = 98
• 2. 獨逸 = 100
• 3. 日本 = 102
• 第3節 刑罰導入의 必要性 = 106
• 1. 條例制定權의 擴大 = 106
• 2. 規制事務 및 國法空白狀態의 增加 = 107
• 3. 條例의 實效性 確保 = 09
• 第4節 刑罰導入을 위한 提言 = 111
• 1. 條例에의 刑罰委任의 違憲性 = 111
• 1) 合憲說 = 112
• 가. 憲法授權說 = 112
• 나. 條例準法律說 = 112
• 다. 法律授權說 = 113
• 2) 違憲說 = 115
• 3) 判例 = 115
• 4) 小結 = 117
• 2. 刑罰導入을 위한 提言 = 118
• 第5章 結論 = 122
• 參考文獻 = 126
• ABSTRACT = 140