情報媒體의 規制法理에 관한 硏究 : 通信放送融合에 따른 形式規制와 規制組織을 中心으로 = (A)jurisprudential study upon regulation of information media

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

A Jurisprudential Study upon
Regulation of Information Media


Lee Min-Yeong
Major in Public Law
Graduate School of Law
Sung-Kyun-Kwan University

As advent of information environment shift shapes up with the progress of Information Technology(IT) accompanied by ｢digital convergence (convergence between telecommunication and broadcasting)｣ and ubiquitous computing, nowadays it is essential systematically to cope with state functions related to electronic information including public administration.
Therefore should the political settlement and positive enforcement of social fluctuation be a criteria and traction for establishing ｢Informations- ordnung(information order)｣ on account of paradigm shift in governmental structure to governance system suitable for accomplishing informational affairs of public administration, because what contains the core value by actualizing national purpose and constituting legal relationship is nothing but information in ｢Informationsgesellschaft(information society)｣.
On that ground, this study investigates ｢Informationsverwaltung(public administration of information)｣ focused upon regulatory principle of information media in the favor of inquiring into the fundamental truth maintaining mutual discipline between administrative authority and civic interests. Such is the viewpoint from ｢Informationsverwaltungsrecht (administrative law dealing with issues of public administration related to information)｣. From such jurisprudential standpoint, as ｢Besonderes Verwaltungsrecht(a distributive concept of administrative law)｣ Informations- verwaltungsrecht includes the spheres which information media regulation(e.g. regulation of services materialized by telecommunication and broadcasting), personal data protection, and electronic government control spread out. As mentioned above, this thesis contemplates information media regulation as a subalternate of Informationsverwaltungsrecht on the conceptual basis that the terminology like ｢Informationsmedien(information media)｣ can bring tele- communication and broadcasting over to convergence's side in digital era and regulatory system of it can show triangle composition which consists of administrative authority, service suppliers, and recipients very well.
It is summarized as follows;
According to prefactory remarks presenting the aim, scope, and methodology of this study in Chapter 1, this paper looks into digital convergence and ubiquitous computing on the whole as information environment shift in behalf of fundamental notions for ｢Informationen (information)｣ and Informationsmedien in Chapter 2.
In addition, Chapter 3 researching into what is regulation preferentially explores traditional regulation theory of media, regulatory legislative system of media centralized on telecommunications, broadcasting, and convergent communication in our country and foremost others, and comparative scrutiny of reciprocal issues on regulatory organization and statutory system.
Furthermore, Chapter 4 groping for a clue to regulatory jurisprudence of information media in convergence paradigm excavates a new frame of media regulation based upon criticizing ｢media-specific analysis｣ crucially referred to ｢horizontal model｣ and ｢layered model｣, a vivid doctrine of media regulation as information policy concentrated on management of radio wave resources and solution of information opportunity divide, and the valid theoretics applicable to configurational regulation and regulatory organization of information media.
Consequently, this treatise reaches following conclusions as Chapter 5;
First, regulatory framework of information media should be directed to fair competition for media configuration concomitant with relevant organization to function and authority of media regulation.
Second, such is the fact established by illustrations shown as regulatory system of chief nations, logical failure of media-specific analysis, and paradigm shift of media regulation.
Third, thus must the regulatory jurisprudence of information media manifest itself through fundamental rules of ｢Beteiligung(participation)｣, ｢Transparenz(transparency)｣, ｢Wirtschaftlichkeit(economicalness)｣, and ｢Ge- rechtigkeit(impartiality)｣ never to be restricted only to any theory of ｢les services publics(public service)｣, ｢Leistungsverwaltung(delivery administration)｣, nor ｢regulatory administration｣.
Synthetically speaking, it stands to reason that the regulatory jurisprudence of information media abide by these rules aiming at ｢erhebliche Rechtsmäßigkeit der Verwaltung(substantial constitutionalism embodied by rules of law on administration)｣ for the sake of public interest. From this angle of vision, these rules would penetrate Informationsverwaltungsrecht with no proof corroborative more than of media regulation. That would be the task set to ｢Verwaltungsrechtslehre(legal science of public administration)｣ as well as the uttermost limit of this dissertation.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 第 1 章 序 論
• 第 1 節 硏究目的
• 第 2 節 硏究의 範圍와 方法
• Ⅰ. 硏究範圍
• Ⅱ. 硏究方法
• 第 2 章 情報環境 變化에 따른 情報媒體의 槪念設定
• 第 1 節 情報環境 變化에 대한 現象的 理解
• Ⅰ. 情報環境의 意義
• Ⅱ. 通信放送融合과 情報環境
• 1. 通信放送融合의 槪念
• 2. 通信放送融合의 要因
• 가. 情報處理의 디지털化
• 나. 情報傳送의 廣帶域化
• 다. 情報交流의 雙方向化
• 3. 通信放送融合의 類型
• 가. 傳送網의 融合
• 나. 서비스의 融合
• 다. 事業者의 融合
• 4. 通信放送融合의 特徵
• 가. 커뮤니케이션 樣式의 變化
• 나. 情報內容傳達 方式의 變遷
• 5. 通信放送融合의 端礎
• 가. 인터넷의 登場
• 나. 인터넷의 槪念
• 다. 인터넷의 特性
• Ⅲ. 유비쿼터스時代의 情報環境
• 1. 유비쿼터스環境의 槪念定立
• 2. 유비쿼터스와 通信放送融合
• 3. 廣大域統合網과 유비쿼터스
• 第 2 節 ‘情報’ 및 ‘情報媒體’ 槪念의 再定立
• Ⅰ. 情報의 意義
• 1. 情報의 槪念
• 가. 情報 槪念의 槪觀
• 나. 情報의 法的 槪念
• 다. 本稿의 情報 槪念
• 2. 情報의 屬性
• 3. 情報의 價値
• Ⅱ. 情報媒體의 意義
• 1. 情報媒體의 槪念
• 가. 情報媒體의 槪念定立
• 나. 情報環境과 情報媒體
• 2. 情報媒體의 類型
• 가. 通信媒體의 槪念的 特徵
• 나. 放送媒體의 槪念的 特徵
• 다. 融合媒體의 槪念的 特徵
• 라. 通信·放送 媒體間 比較
• 第 3 章 情報媒體 規制法制의 現況과 比較法的 分析
• 第 1 節 規制理論의 槪觀과 情報媒體 規制法制의 現況
• Ⅰ. 情報媒體의 規制理論
• 1. 規制의 槪念定立
• 가. 行政規制와의 關聯性
• 나. 規制行政과의 關聯性
• 다. 行政統制와의 關聯性
• 2. 傳統的 規制理論
• 가. 情報媒體의 規制根據
• 나. 通信媒體의 規制根據
• 다. 放送媒體의 規制根據
• 3. 規制理論의 分析
• Ⅱ. 우리나라의 法制現況
• 1. 通信媒體의 規制法制
• 가. 法制體系
• 나. 規制機構
• 다. 規制事例
• 2. 放送媒體의 規制法制
• 가. 法制體系
• 나. 規制機構
• 다. 規制事例
• 3. 融合媒體의 規制法制
• 가. 規制體系
• 나. 統合論議
• 다. 規制事例
• 第 2 節 先進各國의 情報媒體 規制法制의 現況 및 分析
• Ⅰ. 主要國家別 情報媒體 規制法制 動向
• 1. 영 국
• 가. 通信媒體의 規制法制
• 나. 放送媒體의 規制法制
• 다. 融合媒體의 規制法制
• 2. 미 국
• 가. 通信媒體의 規制法制
• 나. 放送媒體의 規制法制
• 다. 融合媒體의 規制法制
• 3. 독 일
• 가. 通信媒體의 規制法制
• 나. 放送媒體의 規制法制
• 다. 融合媒體의 規制法制
• 4. 프랑스
• 가. 通信媒體의 規制法制
• 나. 放送媒體의 規制法制
• 다. 融合媒體의 規制法制
• 5. 일 본
• 가. 通信媒體의 規制法制
• 나. 放送媒體의 規制法制
• 다. 融合媒體의 規制法制
• Ⅱ. 情報媒體 規制法制의 分析과 示唆點
• 1. 情報媒體 規制法制에 대한 比較法的 分析
• 가. 영 국
• 나. 미 국
• 다. 독 일
• 라. 프랑스
• 마. 일 본
• 2. 主要國家別 比較法的 分析에 따른 示唆點
• 第 4 章 情報媒體 規制法理의 새로운 패러다임 摸索
• 第 1 節 旣存 規制體系論議의 限界와 代案
• Ⅰ. 媒體特性論의 分析과 評價
• 1. 媒體特性論의 槪念
• 2. 媒體特性論의 批判
• 3. 小 結
• Ⅱ. 媒體特性論의 代案과 方向
• 1. 水平的 規制體系論
• 2. 層位別 規制體系論
• 3. 小 結
• 第 2 節 情報媒體 規制法理의 理念的 基盤
• Ⅰ. 情報定策의 考慮
• 1. 情報政策의 槪念定義
• 2. 情報媒體規制와의 關聯性
• 3. 情報媒體의 規制政策
• Ⅱ. 電波資源의 管理
• 1. 電波資源管理의 意義
• 2. 電波資源管理의 國外動向
• 3. 關聯法令의 改善方案
• Ⅲ. 情報隔差의 解消
• 1. 情報隔差解消의 意義
• 2. 情報隔差解消의 現行實態
• 3. 關聯法令의 改善方案
• 第 3 節 새로운 情報媒體 規制法理의 摸索
• Ⅰ. 情報媒體의 形式規制 法理
• 1. 理論的 基礎
• 가. 規制法理로서 公役務理論의 適用과 그 限界
• 나. 規制法理로서 給付行政論의 適用과 그 限界
• 다. 規制法理로서 規制行政論의 適用과 그 限界
• 라. 小 結
• 2. 規制別 分析
• 가. 問題提起
• 나. 進入規制
• 다. 所有規制
• 라. 競爭規制
• 3. 論議의 整理
• 가. 情報媒體 規制의 基本理念
• 나. 情報媒體 規制의 基本原則
• 다. 情報媒體 型式規制의 法理
• Ⅱ. 情報媒體의 規制組織 法理
• 1. 理論的 基礎
• 가. 國家行政機關
• 나. 合議制行政機關
• 다. 獨立行政廳
• 2. 改編案 分類
• 가. 規制法制의 改編方向에 따른 類型化
• 나. 規制組織의 構成方案에 따른 類型化
• 3. 類型別 分析
• 가. 國務總理所屬 類型
• 나. 大統領所屬 類型
• 다. 獨立行政廳 類型
• 4. 論議의 整理
• 第 5 章 結 論
• 參考文獻
• Abstract