RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      자연생태교육이 특수학급 아동의 창의성에 미치는 효과 = (The) effects of natural ecology education on creativity development of chidren in special classroom

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10640126

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to identify the effects of the natural ecology education on creativity development of children enrolled in special classroom. The number of subjects in this study were 12(2 were 2nd, 3 were 4th, 2 were 5th, 4 were 6th graders). To obtain the empirical data, Creativity Test(김상윤, 2003), for the primary schooler or the older, were used. It consists of a language test and a geometry test. The language test has 4 subgroup items, and the geometry test has 5 subgroup items. To analyse the empirical data, SPSS sub Program t-test were used.
      The issues of the study were as follows ;
      a) Is there a significant difference on the development level of the language creativity between the exceptional children group that has been given the natural ecology education and the non-handicapped children group that has not given that program?
      b) Is there a significant difference on the development level of the geometry creativity between the exceptional children group that has been given the natural ecology education and the non-handicapped children group that has not given that program.
      The findings were as follows ;
      First, the language creativity development level of the exceptional children group that has been given the natural ecology education appeared significantly more positive than the non-handicapped children group who has not given that program.
      Second, the geometry creativity development levels of the exceptional children group who has been given the natural ecology education appeared significantly higher than the non-handicapped children group who has not given that program.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to identify the effects of the natural ecology education on creativity development of children enrolled in special classroom. The number of subjects in this study were 12(2 were 2nd, 3 were 4th, 2 were 5th, 4 were 6th grad...

      The purpose of this study is to identify the effects of the natural ecology education on creativity development of children enrolled in special classroom. The number of subjects in this study were 12(2 were 2nd, 3 were 4th, 2 were 5th, 4 were 6th graders). To obtain the empirical data, Creativity Test(김상윤, 2003), for the primary schooler or the older, were used. It consists of a language test and a geometry test. The language test has 4 subgroup items, and the geometry test has 5 subgroup items. To analyse the empirical data, SPSS sub Program t-test were used.
      The issues of the study were as follows ;
      a) Is there a significant difference on the development level of the language creativity between the exceptional children group that has been given the natural ecology education and the non-handicapped children group that has not given that program?
      b) Is there a significant difference on the development level of the geometry creativity between the exceptional children group that has been given the natural ecology education and the non-handicapped children group that has not given that program.
      The findings were as follows ;
      First, the language creativity development level of the exceptional children group that has been given the natural ecology education appeared significantly more positive than the non-handicapped children group who has not given that program.
      Second, the geometry creativity development levels of the exceptional children group who has been given the natural ecology education appeared significantly higher than the non-handicapped children group who has not given that program.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차 = ⅰ
      • Ⅰ.서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성과 목적 = 1
      • 2. 연구문제 = 3
      • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 3
      • 목차 = ⅰ
      • Ⅰ.서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성과 목적 = 1
      • 2. 연구문제 = 3
      • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 3
      • 4. 용어 정의 = 4
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 5
      • 1. 자연생태교육 = 5
      • 2. 창의성 = 16
      • Ⅲ. 연구 방법 = 25
      • 1. 연구대상 = 25
      • 2. 연구도구 = 25
      • 3. 연구 설계 = 27
      • 4. 자연생태교육 프로그램의 적용 절차 = 28
      • 5. 자료 처리 = 37
      • Ⅳ. 결과 및 해석 = 26
      • 1. 자연생태교육과 언어 창의성 발달 = 37
      • 2. 자연생태교육과 도형 창의성 발달 = 39
      • Ⅴ. 논의 및 결론 = 41
      • 참고문헌 = 45
      • Abstract = 50
      • 부록 = 52
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼