RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Paths to private entrepreneurship: Markets and occupational mobility in rural China.

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10595443

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Economic transition from plan to market has created new income opportunities, but access to such opportunities is not equal. Past research has stimulated a debate about which group---elite insiders or well-educated non-elites---has preferential access. Recent research begins to emphasize multiple patterns of access. Which group is favored varies widely with such factors as the extensiveness of regime change and institutional barriers to asset appropriation. Within this line of research, I highlight the impact of a particular feature of the economy, the scale of firms that dominate the private sector. I argue that transitional economies propelled by the massive entry of small enterprises allow for a more equal access, politically and educationally. By contrast, transitional economies driven by large corporate firms are more likely to favor political and educational elites. I test this argument in rural China, where the private sector has been dominated by tens of millions of small-holding household enterprises in the last two decades.
    Analysis of nationally representative data collected in 1996 reveals a pattern of equal access. I find a dual elite structure, shared resource access, and low barriers to entry for female, less educated and non-cadres. A dual elite structure is developed as the majority of cadres hold onto cadre posts without moving into the private sector while the vast majority of entrepreneurs come from non-cadre backgrounds; Access to public resources is shared because the number of cadre entrepreneurs is too small to monopolize all the resources and opportunities; The barriers to entry are low politically and educationally because entrepreneurial opportunities are so widespread that political capital and human capital are not requisite for access to such opportunities. I suggest future research to test whether the pattern of access is comparatively less equal in transitional economies where large corporate firms are more dominant.
    번역하기

    Economic transition from plan to market has created new income opportunities, but access to such opportunities is not equal. Past research has stimulated a debate about which group---elite insiders or well-educated non-elites---has preferential acces...

    Economic transition from plan to market has created new income opportunities, but access to such opportunities is not equal. Past research has stimulated a debate about which group---elite insiders or well-educated non-elites---has preferential access. Recent research begins to emphasize multiple patterns of access. Which group is favored varies widely with such factors as the extensiveness of regime change and institutional barriers to asset appropriation. Within this line of research, I highlight the impact of a particular feature of the economy, the scale of firms that dominate the private sector. I argue that transitional economies propelled by the massive entry of small enterprises allow for a more equal access, politically and educationally. By contrast, transitional economies driven by large corporate firms are more likely to favor political and educational elites. I test this argument in rural China, where the private sector has been dominated by tens of millions of small-holding household enterprises in the last two decades.
    Analysis of nationally representative data collected in 1996 reveals a pattern of equal access. I find a dual elite structure, shared resource access, and low barriers to entry for female, less educated and non-cadres. A dual elite structure is developed as the majority of cadres hold onto cadre posts without moving into the private sector while the vast majority of entrepreneurs come from non-cadre backgrounds; Access to public resources is shared because the number of cadre entrepreneurs is too small to monopolize all the resources and opportunities; The barriers to entry are low politically and educationally because entrepreneurial opportunities are so widespread that political capital and human capital are not requisite for access to such opportunities. I suggest future research to test whether the pattern of access is comparatively less equal in transitional economies where large corporate firms are more dominant.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼