RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Social validity assessment of social competence intervention target behaviors for preschoolers from the perspective of teachers and administrators.

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10588993

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    While the development of social competence comes naturally for many children, others have difficulty developing social skills and as a result are at risk for a variety of problems. There is a large body of empirical research on effective social competence interventions for young children with and without disabilities (Odom, McConnell, McEvoy, Peterson, Ostrosky, Chandler, Spicuzza, Skellenger, Creighron, & Favazza, 1999). Social validation is the subjective value judgement from society on the importance of a study for the levels of: (a) goals, (b) procedures, and (c) effects (Wolf, 1978).
    The purpose of this dissertation was to first review the social validity assessment for classroom based social competence intervention literature for young children. After describing the lack of social validity assessment for this area of research, especially for the level of goals, a q-method study was proposed and conducted for the purpose of assessing the social validity of the target behaviors used in the social competence intervention literature. Participants (n = 36) were early childhood special educators, early childhood educators, and administrators who were currently serving young children. Results suggest that there are three distinct viewpoints about the most valued social competence target behaviors among participants: (a) valuing a reduction in negative verbal and physical behaviors and an increase in the rate of smiling, (b) valuing an increase in social interactions such as cooperative play and sharing, and (c) valuing communication skills and good manners. Limitations of the present study and recommendations for future research were provided.
    번역하기

    While the development of social competence comes naturally for many children, others have difficulty developing social skills and as a result are at risk for a variety of problems. There is a large body of empirical research on effective social compe...

    While the development of social competence comes naturally for many children, others have difficulty developing social skills and as a result are at risk for a variety of problems. There is a large body of empirical research on effective social competence interventions for young children with and without disabilities (Odom, McConnell, McEvoy, Peterson, Ostrosky, Chandler, Spicuzza, Skellenger, Creighron, & Favazza, 1999). Social validation is the subjective value judgement from society on the importance of a study for the levels of: (a) goals, (b) procedures, and (c) effects (Wolf, 1978).
    The purpose of this dissertation was to first review the social validity assessment for classroom based social competence intervention literature for young children. After describing the lack of social validity assessment for this area of research, especially for the level of goals, a q-method study was proposed and conducted for the purpose of assessing the social validity of the target behaviors used in the social competence intervention literature. Participants (n = 36) were early childhood special educators, early childhood educators, and administrators who were currently serving young children. Results suggest that there are three distinct viewpoints about the most valued social competence target behaviors among participants: (a) valuing a reduction in negative verbal and physical behaviors and an increase in the rate of smiling, (b) valuing an increase in social interactions such as cooperative play and sharing, and (c) valuing communication skills and good manners. Limitations of the present study and recommendations for future research were provided.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼