RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    The implications and outcomes of using problem-based learning to teach middle school science.

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10558284

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Problem-based learning (PBL) is an educational approach where a purposefully ill-structured problem initiates learning and the teacher serves as a coach instead of an information repository (Gallagher & Stepien, 1996). This approach is becoming a very popular curricular innovation, especially at the middle and secondary levels. PBL is necessarily interdisciplinary: By modeling real-world problems, which are seldom unidisciplinary, students are required to cross the traditional disciplinary boundaries in their quest to solve the problem. PBL is also based upon the theories of situated cognition, which posit that transfer occurs infrequently and that learning requires situation-specific competence (Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989; Plucker & Nowak, 2000; Resnick, 1987). Rather than present students with information that they may or may not be able to use to solve problems, situated cognition stresses that knowledge should be presented in context, preferably in a problem-solving scenario (Plucker & Nowak, 2000). In addition, PBL is consistent with the principles of constructivism (Savery & Duffy, 1995).
    Several questions have been raised about the appropriateness of using PBL in the K–12 classroom setting. The purpose of this study is to specifically address whether or not students learn as much via PBL techniques as they do in traditional classroom settings. This was accomplished by comparing two eighth grade gifted and talented science classes in a Midwest public middle school. Focused observations, interviews, test score analyses, and document analyses were incorporated into this study.
    Test score analyses of pretest and posttests indicate that students in a teacher-directed classroom learn factual content at a higher rate than students learning via a PBL instructional approach. Students engaged in PBL, however, have better retention than those who learn under a teacher-directed instructional approach. Interview analyses indicate that students favor learning via PBL, but many students suggest that embedding teacher-directed lessons within a PBL unit would benefit the students more than an exclusively PBL-based curriculum.
    번역하기

    Problem-based learning (PBL) is an educational approach where a purposefully ill-structured problem initiates learning and the teacher serves as a coach instead of an information repository (Gallagher & Stepien, 1996). This approach is becoming a...

    Problem-based learning (PBL) is an educational approach where a purposefully ill-structured problem initiates learning and the teacher serves as a coach instead of an information repository (Gallagher & Stepien, 1996). This approach is becoming a very popular curricular innovation, especially at the middle and secondary levels. PBL is necessarily interdisciplinary: By modeling real-world problems, which are seldom unidisciplinary, students are required to cross the traditional disciplinary boundaries in their quest to solve the problem. PBL is also based upon the theories of situated cognition, which posit that transfer occurs infrequently and that learning requires situation-specific competence (Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989; Plucker & Nowak, 2000; Resnick, 1987). Rather than present students with information that they may or may not be able to use to solve problems, situated cognition stresses that knowledge should be presented in context, preferably in a problem-solving scenario (Plucker & Nowak, 2000). In addition, PBL is consistent with the principles of constructivism (Savery & Duffy, 1995).
    Several questions have been raised about the appropriateness of using PBL in the K–12 classroom setting. The purpose of this study is to specifically address whether or not students learn as much via PBL techniques as they do in traditional classroom settings. This was accomplished by comparing two eighth grade gifted and talented science classes in a Midwest public middle school. Focused observations, interviews, test score analyses, and document analyses were incorporated into this study.
    Test score analyses of pretest and posttests indicate that students in a teacher-directed classroom learn factual content at a higher rate than students learning via a PBL instructional approach. Students engaged in PBL, however, have better retention than those who learn under a teacher-directed instructional approach. Interview analyses indicate that students favor learning via PBL, but many students suggest that embedding teacher-directed lessons within a PBL unit would benefit the students more than an exclusively PBL-based curriculum.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼