RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Asynchronous learning networks and cognitive apprenticeship: A potential model for teaching complex problem-solving skills in corporate environments.

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10554779

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Cognitive apprenticeship is an instructional design model which focuses on the development of higher level thinking skills such as problem-solving. In my study, this instructional design approach was tested for its effectiveness in teaching technical skills to adult learners in an on-line learning environment.
    Two six-week Object Oriented Analysis (OOA) courses were offered to IBM professionals and NYU graduate students during the winter and spring semester of 1999. An Asynchronous Learning Network was used as the online platform for these courses. Students accessed the courses using either a Lotus Notes client or a web browser. The courses were collaborative and varied in terms of the instructional design: traditional text based with audio or cognitive apprenticeship.
    Forty-three students were recruited for the study, twenty IBM professionals, and twenty-three NYU graduate students. The results of data analysis on pretests indicated no difference between the groups in their initial knowledge of OOA. After the completion of each six-week course, a posttest was administered. A panel of three expert OOA professionals was recruited to assess student performance. Solutions were rated based on the inclusion and quality of four components: a Use Case, Object Model, Interaction Diagram, and Glossary of Objects. The results of data analyses revealed that while both groups showed significant improvements in OOA knowledge as a result of the OOA course, the cognitive apprenticeship group outperformed the text-based group on aspects of the OOA solution which required complex problem-solving (creating Object Models and Interaction Diagrams). No difference between the groups was observed with respect to their ability to identify a Use Case. The text-based group scored higher with respect to creating a Glossary of Objects. It is felt that students spent their time on tasks they considered to be most important or on those with which they felt most comfortable completing. The overall conclusion is that the cognitive apprenticeship group developed better complex problem-solving skills than the text-based group.
    번역하기

    Cognitive apprenticeship is an instructional design model which focuses on the development of higher level thinking skills such as problem-solving. In my study, this instructional design approach was tested for its effectiveness in teaching technical...

    Cognitive apprenticeship is an instructional design model which focuses on the development of higher level thinking skills such as problem-solving. In my study, this instructional design approach was tested for its effectiveness in teaching technical skills to adult learners in an on-line learning environment.
    Two six-week Object Oriented Analysis (OOA) courses were offered to IBM professionals and NYU graduate students during the winter and spring semester of 1999. An Asynchronous Learning Network was used as the online platform for these courses. Students accessed the courses using either a Lotus Notes client or a web browser. The courses were collaborative and varied in terms of the instructional design: traditional text based with audio or cognitive apprenticeship.
    Forty-three students were recruited for the study, twenty IBM professionals, and twenty-three NYU graduate students. The results of data analysis on pretests indicated no difference between the groups in their initial knowledge of OOA. After the completion of each six-week course, a posttest was administered. A panel of three expert OOA professionals was recruited to assess student performance. Solutions were rated based on the inclusion and quality of four components: a Use Case, Object Model, Interaction Diagram, and Glossary of Objects. The results of data analyses revealed that while both groups showed significant improvements in OOA knowledge as a result of the OOA course, the cognitive apprenticeship group outperformed the text-based group on aspects of the OOA solution which required complex problem-solving (creating Object Models and Interaction Diagrams). No difference between the groups was observed with respect to their ability to identify a Use Case. The text-based group scored higher with respect to creating a Glossary of Objects. It is felt that students spent their time on tasks they considered to be most important or on those with which they felt most comfortable completing. The overall conclusion is that the cognitive apprenticeship group developed better complex problem-solving skills than the text-based group.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼