Cognitive patterns of neuroanatomy concepts: Knowledge organizations that emerge from problem solving versus information gathering.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study was motivated by some of the claims that are found in the literature on Problem-Based Learning (PBL). This instructional technique, which uses case studies as its primary instructional tool, has been advanced as an alternative to traditional instruction in order to foster more meaningful, integrative learning of scientific concepts. Several of the advantages attributed to Problem-Based Learning are that it (1) is generally preferred by students because it appears to foster a more nurturing and enjoyable learning experience, (2) fosters greater retention of knowledge and concepts acquired, and (3) results in increased ability to apply this knowledge toward solving new problems. This study examines the differences that result when students learn neuroanatomy concepts under two instructional contexts: problem solving vs. information gathering. The technological resource provided to students to support learning under each of these contexts was the multimedia program <italic> BrainStorm: An Interactive Neuroanatomy Atlas</italic> (Coppa & Tancred, 1995). The study explores the influence of context with regard to subjects' performance on objective post-tests, organization of knowledge as measured by Pathfinder Networks, differential use of the multimedia software and discourse differences emerging from the transcripts.
The findings support previous research in the literature that problem-solving results in less knowledge acquisition in the short term, greater retention of material over time, and a subjects' preference for the method. However, both the degree of retention and preference were influenced by subjects' prior knowledge of the material in the exercises, as there was a significant difference in performance between the two exercises: for the exercise about which subjects appeared to have greater background information, memory decay was less, and subject attitude toward the problem solving instructional format was more favorable, than for the exercise for which subjects had less prior knowledge. Subjects also used the software differently under each format with regard to modules accessed, time spent in modules, and types of information sought. In addition, analyses of the transcripts showed more numerous occurrences of explanations and summarizations in the problem-solving context, compared to the information gathering context. The attempts to show significant differences between the contexts by means of Pathfinder analyses were less than successful.