RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      The prestige motive in international relations.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10546571

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The mainstream of contemporary international relations scholarship tends to locate the origin of international conflict in the competition between individuals and states over material goods, such as military security or economic profit. But a close reading of the foundational texts in the tradition of political realism suggests that the pursuit of prestige, a non-material end, is properly understood as an additional and independent cause of rivalry and violence. The “prestige motive” is initially defined as the individual or collective desire for public recognition of eminence as an end in itself. The insights of classical political realists—Thucydides, Machiavelli, Hobbes, and Rousseau—help to augment this definition, and the pursuit of prestige is found to be characterized by four essential elements: it is irrational, social, perpetual, and relative. In combination with the desire for security and profit, the quest for prestige is therefore one of the central causes of conflict in international relations.
      Three levels of discussion frame the subsequent empirical analysis—the statesman, the nation-state, and the international system—and correspond roughly to Kenneth N. Waltz's “three images” of international relations. Beginning with the statesman, leaders across a variety of cultures are shown to seek prestige for themselves and for their nations, thus shaping national foreign policy preferences and ultimately influencing international outcomes. First image cases focus on the prestige motivated policies of Charles de Gaulle, Mao Zedong, and Wilhelm II of Germany. At the “second image” level, political collectives (nation-states) are shown to pursue prestige in their interactions with other collectives. This dynamic may be mitigated by domestic political institutions (regime type). Second image cases focus on early 20<super>th</super> century German aggression, the Spanish-American War, and India's nuclear tests of May 1998. Finally, “third image” forces, particularly shared cultural norms, are emphasized in an attempt to determine how specific and concrete goods or actions become associated with the pursuit of prestige. Third image case studies focus on the social-political norms of the Concert of Europe prior to the Crimean War, and on Japan's entry into Western international society during the second half of the 19<super> th</super> century.
      번역하기

      The mainstream of contemporary international relations scholarship tends to locate the origin of international conflict in the competition between individuals and states over material goods, such as military security or economic profit. But a close r...

      The mainstream of contemporary international relations scholarship tends to locate the origin of international conflict in the competition between individuals and states over material goods, such as military security or economic profit. But a close reading of the foundational texts in the tradition of political realism suggests that the pursuit of prestige, a non-material end, is properly understood as an additional and independent cause of rivalry and violence. The “prestige motive” is initially defined as the individual or collective desire for public recognition of eminence as an end in itself. The insights of classical political realists—Thucydides, Machiavelli, Hobbes, and Rousseau—help to augment this definition, and the pursuit of prestige is found to be characterized by four essential elements: it is irrational, social, perpetual, and relative. In combination with the desire for security and profit, the quest for prestige is therefore one of the central causes of conflict in international relations.
      Three levels of discussion frame the subsequent empirical analysis—the statesman, the nation-state, and the international system—and correspond roughly to Kenneth N. Waltz's “three images” of international relations. Beginning with the statesman, leaders across a variety of cultures are shown to seek prestige for themselves and for their nations, thus shaping national foreign policy preferences and ultimately influencing international outcomes. First image cases focus on the prestige motivated policies of Charles de Gaulle, Mao Zedong, and Wilhelm II of Germany. At the “second image” level, political collectives (nation-states) are shown to pursue prestige in their interactions with other collectives. This dynamic may be mitigated by domestic political institutions (regime type). Second image cases focus on early 20<super>th</super> century German aggression, the Spanish-American War, and India's nuclear tests of May 1998. Finally, “third image” forces, particularly shared cultural norms, are emphasized in an attempt to determine how specific and concrete goods or actions become associated with the pursuit of prestige. Third image case studies focus on the social-political norms of the Concert of Europe prior to the Crimean War, and on Japan's entry into Western international society during the second half of the 19<super> th</super> century.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼