태권도 지도자의 리더십이 선수의 지도자 만족에 미치는 영향 : 대응가치 리더십 이론을 중심으로 = (The) Relationship between Competing Values Leadership of Taekwondo Coaches and Coach Satisfaction of Players

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study was to conducted to apply Quinn's Competing Values leadership Paradigm which define leadership dynamically and holistically to the sport field, and to compare them with the role of the Taekwondo coaches, and to analyzed leader roles dependency, and to relationships between the six roles of the coaches and coaches satisfaction of players.
The subjects were 150 Taekwondo palyers and explain the purpose of this study and contents of the questionnaire, and ask players to answer the questionnaire. The measures were CVLQS(Competing Values Leadership for Scale) developed by Ha Hyung-ju(1996) and LBDQ(Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire) by Lee(1998). The roles dependency of the each team's coaches was analyzed through one-way ANOVA with repeated measures and paired t test. Also, relationships between the six roles of the coaches and coaches satisfaction of players was analyzed through multiple regression analysis. Data was analyzed through SPSS 12.0 Version and AMOS 5.0. The level of significance was set up α=.05. From the upper the procedure, the results were made as follow.
Firstly, Taekwondo coaches have used more mediating broker role, calculating executioner role, and authoritative instructor role and have used less innovative researcher role and analytic manager role.
Secondly, in regard with multiple regression analysis on relationships between the six roles of the coaches and coaches satisfaction of players, role of the managers' leadership, innovative researcher role, analytic manager role, and mentor role had positive effect on coaches satisfaction of players.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차 = ⅰ
• 표목차 = ⅲ
• 그림목차 = ⅳ
• Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
• 1. 연구의 필요성 = 1
• 2. 연구 목적 = 5
• 3. 연구 모형 및 문제 = 5
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 6
• 1. 리더십의 개념 = 6
• 2. 리더십 이론의 발전과정 = 8
• 3. 변혁적 리더십 이론 = 11
• 4. 리더십관련 선행연구 = 23
• 5. 대응가치 리더십 이론 = 24
• Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 35
• 1. 연구대상 = 35
• 2. 측정도구 = 35
• 3. 연구절차 = 37
• 4. 자료 분석 방법 = 37
• Ⅳ. 연구결과 = 38
• Ⅴ. 논의 = 43
• Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 = 45
• 참고문헌 = 47
• Abstract = 55