RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    청소년 양성평등의 실태 분석 = A study on the gender-equality consciousness of adolescents and their daily lives

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10451453

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study is designed to make a comparative analysis to determine how different the gender-equality consciousness of adolescents is in accordance with several background reasons (gender, co education, middle school or high school, whether they live with grand parents or not, whether their parents are double income couples or not, how high their parents' zeal about their children's education) and to determine how much ordinary families give their children the gender equality education.
    With this in mind, the researcher worked with a total of 553 teenagers in North Jolla province, creating, distributing and collecting questionnaires concerned with the gender-equality consciousness and the gender-equality education. The researcher built on SPPS 11.5 Program to make an analysis of the gathered questionnaires. The following are the findings.
    First, the comparison of the gender-equality consciousness in accordance with gender showed that female students had more gender-equality consciousness than male students and showed that there was a significant difference about the gender-equality consciousness in home, school, workplace and the society in accordance with gender even when compared with the sub factors.
    Second, the comparison showed that there was little difference about the gender-equality consciousness in accordance with coeducation(not gender). But the comparison between a coed school, a boys' school and a girls' school showed a significant difference.
    Third, the comparison showed that there was little difference about the gender-equality consciousness according as it was a high school or middle school but high school students showed higher gender-equality consciousness than middle school students.
    Fourth the comparison of the gender-equality consciousness according as they live with their parents showed that students who live with parents had more gender-equality consciousness than students who do not live with and showed that there was a significant difference about the gender-equality consciousness between them.
    Fifth the comparison of the gender-equality consciousness according as their parents are double income couples showed that students whose parents are double income couples had more gender-equality consciousness than students whose parents are not double income couples and showed that there was a significant difference about the gender-equality consciousness between them.
    Sixth the comparison of the gender-equality consciousness according as how high their parents' zeal about their children's education showed that students whose parents expected their children to have college degrees had more gender-equality consciousness than students whose parents did not expect their children to have college degrees and that there was a significant difference about the gender-equality consciousness between them.
    And looking at how much students live the gender-equality lives in their home in accordance with gender and structural characteristics of the family, the result was that most of the students lived the gender-equality lives in their home generally. But looking closely, female students lived more gender-equality lives than male students, and whether the students live with grandparents or not affected negatively on the gender-equality lives in their home. And also when their parents' zeal about their children's education was higher, students were able to live the gender-equality lives in their home
    Lastly looking at the gender-equality lives in their schools in accordance with gender and education in school, almost all schools taught students the gender-equality lives generally.
    But the teaching was not enough so more education on gender-equality in school was needed. Looking at related sub factors it was really different between middle school and high school in the gender-equality lives in their schools. Middle school students lived the more gender-equality lives than high school students.
    This study indicates that there is a big difference on the gender-equality consciousness of adolescents in accordance with gender. In the future society adolescents will hopefully have the gender-equality consciousness, and society and school have to try to build the world that is devoid of the word "gender-equality"
    번역하기

    This study is designed to make a comparative analysis to determine how different the gender-equality consciousness of adolescents is in accordance with several background reasons (gender, co education, middle school or high school, whether they live w...

    This study is designed to make a comparative analysis to determine how different the gender-equality consciousness of adolescents is in accordance with several background reasons (gender, co education, middle school or high school, whether they live with grand parents or not, whether their parents are double income couples or not, how high their parents' zeal about their children's education) and to determine how much ordinary families give their children the gender equality education.
    With this in mind, the researcher worked with a total of 553 teenagers in North Jolla province, creating, distributing and collecting questionnaires concerned with the gender-equality consciousness and the gender-equality education. The researcher built on SPPS 11.5 Program to make an analysis of the gathered questionnaires. The following are the findings.
    First, the comparison of the gender-equality consciousness in accordance with gender showed that female students had more gender-equality consciousness than male students and showed that there was a significant difference about the gender-equality consciousness in home, school, workplace and the society in accordance with gender even when compared with the sub factors.
    Second, the comparison showed that there was little difference about the gender-equality consciousness in accordance with coeducation(not gender). But the comparison between a coed school, a boys' school and a girls' school showed a significant difference.
    Third, the comparison showed that there was little difference about the gender-equality consciousness according as it was a high school or middle school but high school students showed higher gender-equality consciousness than middle school students.
    Fourth the comparison of the gender-equality consciousness according as they live with their parents showed that students who live with parents had more gender-equality consciousness than students who do not live with and showed that there was a significant difference about the gender-equality consciousness between them.
    Fifth the comparison of the gender-equality consciousness according as their parents are double income couples showed that students whose parents are double income couples had more gender-equality consciousness than students whose parents are not double income couples and showed that there was a significant difference about the gender-equality consciousness between them.
    Sixth the comparison of the gender-equality consciousness according as how high their parents' zeal about their children's education showed that students whose parents expected their children to have college degrees had more gender-equality consciousness than students whose parents did not expect their children to have college degrees and that there was a significant difference about the gender-equality consciousness between them.
    And looking at how much students live the gender-equality lives in their home in accordance with gender and structural characteristics of the family, the result was that most of the students lived the gender-equality lives in their home generally. But looking closely, female students lived more gender-equality lives than male students, and whether the students live with grandparents or not affected negatively on the gender-equality lives in their home. And also when their parents' zeal about their children's education was higher, students were able to live the gender-equality lives in their home
    Lastly looking at the gender-equality lives in their schools in accordance with gender and education in school, almost all schools taught students the gender-equality lives generally.
    But the teaching was not enough so more education on gender-equality in school was needed. Looking at related sub factors it was really different between middle school and high school in the gender-equality lives in their schools. Middle school students lived the more gender-equality lives than high school students.
    This study indicates that there is a big difference on the gender-equality consciousness of adolescents in accordance with gender. In the future society adolescents will hopefully have the gender-equality consciousness, and society and school have to try to build the world that is devoid of the word "gender-equality"

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • 목차 = ⅰ
    • 표목차 = ⅲ
    • Abstract = ⅴ
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 목차
    • 목차 = ⅰ
    • 표목차 = ⅲ
    • Abstract = ⅴ
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구 문제 = 4
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 5
    • 1. 양성평등의 개념 = 5
    • 2. 양성평등의 필요성 = 7
    • 3. 성차의 형성과정 및 양성평등 = 9
    • 4. 양성평등의식과 양성평등교육 = 14
    • 5. 선행연구의 분석 = 22
    • Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 25
    • 1. 연구대상 = 25
    • 2. 조사도구 = 26
    • 3. 자료처리 = 28
    • Ⅳ. 연구결과 및 해석 = 29
    • 1. 성별과 학교의 특성 그리고 가족의 구조적 특성에 따른 양성평등의식 차이 비교 = 29
    • 2. 성별과 가족의 구조적 특성 그리고 학교의 특성에 따른 양성평등 실태 분석 = 35
    • Ⅴ. 논의 = 48
    • Ⅵ. 요약 및 결론 = 49
    • 1. 요약 = 49
    • 2. 결론 = 52
    • 참고문헌 = 54
    • 부록 = 57
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼