RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    제 6차 및 7차 교육과정에 따른 중학교 과학 교과서의 비교 분석 : 과학 1의 생물단원 내용을 중심으로

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10301948

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to provide referential data to support the development of much better textbook, based on contents analysis of middle school first grade text(11 kinds in each domain), and particularly the biological domain, in the sixth and the seventh revised curricula.
    The results of comparative analysis of biology area of middle school science 1 textbooks are as follows;
    * A thesis submitted to the Committee of the Graduate School of Education, Gyeongsang National University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master's degree of Education in February, 2006.
    The most prominent difference between the sixth and the seventh curriculum is the development of interrelated curriculum from the third grade in elementary school to the first grade in highschool based on the people common standard curriculum. Also, there are less contents and more learning topics in the seventh curriculum than the sixth curriculum.
    It is analyzed that the kinds and numbers written in textbooks are varied and increased by strengthening integrative inquiry activities.
    In this study, the middle school science 1 textbooks of the sixth and the seventh curriculum are analyzed on the basis of areas. In the number of pages of textbooks, seventh curriculum were generally more reduced than the sixth curriculum, but in the course, variety of inquiry activities except only experiments is increased while there are less experiments. Especially, the number of picture is remarkably increased with more question. This is because of various learning picture and strengthening of inquiry activities.
    The result of comparative analysis of biology area of middle school science 1 textbooks shows that seventh curriculum is a little in accord with sixth curriculum in the main learning contents. This is due to reduction in old contents and increase in new contents.
    The result of inquiry analysis of biology area of the middle school science 1 textbooks by Romey method shows that the evaluation index T value about textbook contents is 0.63 in the sixth curriculum and 0.12 in the seventh curriculum. The former is analyzed inquiry while the latter is analyzed authoritative. The evaluation index Q value about question contents is 2.97 in the sixth curriculum and 1.45 in the seventh curriculum. The textbook in sixth curriculum, which evaluation index jumped over 1.5, was decided too much exploratory for student level. Compared with this, a question of the seventh textbook was appeared more suitable in exploratory propensity.
    The comparison and analysis between middle school science curriculum and system and contents of science 1 textbooks results in that some parts of the seventh middle school science textbooks are fit to the seventh middle school curriculum but some parts are not.
    Middle school science 1 textbooks of the seventh curriculum has more inquiry contents than the sixth, but its contents is a bit of authoritative. Then it needs to develop more inquiry and interrelated textbooks.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to provide referential data to support the development of much better textbook, based on contents analysis of middle school first grade text(11 kinds in each domain), and particularly the biological domain, in the sixth an...

    The purpose of this study is to provide referential data to support the development of much better textbook, based on contents analysis of middle school first grade text(11 kinds in each domain), and particularly the biological domain, in the sixth and the seventh revised curricula.
    The results of comparative analysis of biology area of middle school science 1 textbooks are as follows;
    * A thesis submitted to the Committee of the Graduate School of Education, Gyeongsang National University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master's degree of Education in February, 2006.
    The most prominent difference between the sixth and the seventh curriculum is the development of interrelated curriculum from the third grade in elementary school to the first grade in highschool based on the people common standard curriculum. Also, there are less contents and more learning topics in the seventh curriculum than the sixth curriculum.
    It is analyzed that the kinds and numbers written in textbooks are varied and increased by strengthening integrative inquiry activities.
    In this study, the middle school science 1 textbooks of the sixth and the seventh curriculum are analyzed on the basis of areas. In the number of pages of textbooks, seventh curriculum were generally more reduced than the sixth curriculum, but in the course, variety of inquiry activities except only experiments is increased while there are less experiments. Especially, the number of picture is remarkably increased with more question. This is because of various learning picture and strengthening of inquiry activities.
    The result of comparative analysis of biology area of middle school science 1 textbooks shows that seventh curriculum is a little in accord with sixth curriculum in the main learning contents. This is due to reduction in old contents and increase in new contents.
    The result of inquiry analysis of biology area of the middle school science 1 textbooks by Romey method shows that the evaluation index T value about textbook contents is 0.63 in the sixth curriculum and 0.12 in the seventh curriculum. The former is analyzed inquiry while the latter is analyzed authoritative. The evaluation index Q value about question contents is 2.97 in the sixth curriculum and 1.45 in the seventh curriculum. The textbook in sixth curriculum, which evaluation index jumped over 1.5, was decided too much exploratory for student level. Compared with this, a question of the seventh textbook was appeared more suitable in exploratory propensity.
    The comparison and analysis between middle school science curriculum and system and contents of science 1 textbooks results in that some parts of the seventh middle school science textbooks are fit to the seventh middle school curriculum but some parts are not.
    Middle school science 1 textbooks of the seventh curriculum has more inquiry contents than the sixth, but its contents is a bit of authoritative. Then it needs to develop more inquiry and interrelated textbooks.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ 서 론 = 1
    • 1 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2 연구의 제한점 = 2
    • Ⅱ 연구의 이론적 배경 = 3
    • 1 7차 교육과정의 특성 = 4
    • Ⅰ 서 론 = 1
    • 1 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2 연구의 제한점 = 2
    • Ⅱ 연구의 이론적 배경 = 3
    • 1 7차 교육과정의 특성 = 4
    • 2 교과서의 정의 및 기능 = 5
    • 3 교과서의 구성 체제 = 5
    • 4 Romey의 과학 교과서 분석 방법 = 6
    • Ⅲ 연구 내용 및 방법 = 10
    • 1 연구 내용 = 10
    • 2 연구 방법 = 11
    • Ⅳ 연구 결과 및 논의 = 15
    • 1 제 6차와 7차 중학교 과학과 교육과정 비교 분석 = 15
    • 1) 제 6차와 7차 중학교 과학과 교육과정 개정의 중점 비교 분석 = 15
    • 2) 제 6차와 7차 중학교 과학1 교과서의 내용 체제 비교 분석 = 17
    • 2 제 6차와 7차 중학교 과학1 교과서의 영역별(물리, 화학, 생물, 지구과학) 체제 비교 분석 = 18
    • 1) 제 6차와 7차 중학교 과학1 교과서의 지면 수 비교 분석 = 18
    • 2) 제 6차와 7차 중학교 과학1 교과서의 실험 수 비교 분석 = 20
    • 3) 제 6차와 7차 중학교 과학1 교과서의 그림 수 비교 분석 = 21
    • 4) 제 6차와 7차 중학교 과학1 교과서의 표 수 비교 분석 = 22
    • 5) 제 6차와 7차 중학교 과학1 교과서의 문제 수 비교 분석 = 23
    • 3 제 6차와 7차 중학교 과학1 교과서의 생물 영역 내용(탐구 중심) 비교 분석 = 24
    • 1) 제 6차와 7차 중학교 과학1 교과서의 생물 영역 단원명 비교 분석 = 24
    • 2) 제 6차와 7차 중학교 과학1 교과서의 생물 영역 주요 학습 내용별 비교 분석 = 24
    • 3) Romey법에 의한 제 6차와 7차 중학교 과학1 교과서 생물 영역의 평가지수 분석 = 26
    • 4) 제 6차와 7차 중학교 과학1 교과서의 탐구활동 비교 분석 = 31
    • 4 제 7차 중학교 과학과 교육과정과 중학교 과학1 교과서의 체제, 내용간의 연관성 비교 분석 = 42
    • Ⅴ 결 론 = 44
    • Ⅵ 참고 문헌 = 45
    • Ⅶ 부 록 = 47
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼