澤堂 李植의 학문성향과 南冥學 비판

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Injo Restoration(仁祖反正) was important event of late Chosun government history. Kwanghe-gun was banished as deposed king and the northerner faction like Lee Yi-chum(李爾瞻 : 1560∼1623), Jeong In-hong(鄭仁弘 : 1532∼1623) were ruined due to this event, so the northerners(大北派) occupied governmental power. The power was concentrated upon the northerners, and the majority of them were a literary men of Yulgok Lee yi(栗谷 李珥 : 1536∼1584), Ugye Sung Hon(牛溪 成渾 : 1535∼1598).
The government of the westerners need to record Yulgok and Ugye's Moon Myo Jong Sa(文廟從祀) and the history from Sunjo dynasty to Injo dynasty to strengthen their political basis and to rationalize the restoration.
Taekdang Lee sik(澤堂 李植 : 1584∼1647) raised a request of adjustment for “A true record of the Sunjo” edited by the northerners like Lee yi-chum, Jeong In-hong, Gi Ja-hyeon(奇自獻 : 1567∼1624), and led the adjustment work of that. Taekdang is a person of the Noron family of Hunchok and his scholastic mantle is Ki-ho school(畿湖學派) connected with Yulgok Lee yi, Shagye Kim Jang-saeng(沙溪 金長生 : 1548∼1631), and Woo-am Song Si-youl(尤菴 宋時烈 : 1607∼1689). He was persecuted by the northerner faction like Lee Yi-chum in Kwanghae-gun period. But as having a political power by Injo restoration, he had consecutively filled various government posts like Yi-jo jwarang(吏曹佐郞), Busuchan(副修撰), Daesagan(大司諫), Daesahun(大司憲), and Daejehak(大提學). And he was known for a good writer at that time.
Through the adjustment of “A true record of the Sunjo", he hopes to reform the estimation of Jung Chul(鄭澈 : 1536∼1593)'s works leading all activities of Lee Yi, Seonghon, and the northerners who damaged their reputation. He concentrates on description of their relationship and the estimation for Lee Yi, Seonghon, Jeong Chul who shown in “A true record of Sunjo" Therefore, I want to study a role of the adjustment in “A true record of the Sunjo” and political intention through comparison between “A true record of the Sunjo” and “A true record of the Chosun dynasty." And then, I want to research that Taeckdang's real criticism on Nammyeong and Nammyeong study and his opposing situation, negative recognition, and estimation for that.
Through this paper, I inquire into Taeckdang Lee Sik's learning and the viewpoint of thought. Especially, I want to study various viewpoints for asserting correction of a true record and criticism for Nammyeong study. This paper's significant meaning is to grasp different view among many schools at that period and general estimation for Nammyeong study in special.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• ◇ SUMMARY = ⅰ
• Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
• 1. 연구목적 = 1
• 2. 연구방법 = 2
• Ⅱ. 생애와 학문성향 = 5
• 1. 생애와 성학과정 = 5
• 2. 학문성향과 문학관 = 7
• Ⅲ. 李植의 「宣祖實錄」 개수에 나타난 의도 = 15
• 1. 「宣祖修正實錄」 편찬을 전후한 정치적 상황 = 15
• 2. 「宣祖修正實錄」에 나타난 사상적 의도 = 19
• Ⅳ. 李植의 남명학 비판과 사상적 입장 = 33
• 1. 이단론에 근거한 사상적 입장 = 33
• 2. 李植의 남명학에 대한 비판 = 39
• Ⅴ. 남명학 비판의 전개양상 = 44
• 1. 서인계 학자의 남명학 비판 = 44
• 2. 남명학 비판에 대한 강우 학자의 반박 = 49
• Ⅵ. 결론 = 55
• 참고문헌 = 58