RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      감각통합훈련이 정신지체아동의 주의집중력에 미치는 효과 = Effects of sensory integration training program on improving concentration of mental retardation children

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10083865

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study was aimed at revealing effects of sensory integration training program on improving concentration of mental retardation children. According to the goal of this study, 20 mental retardation children were divided into 2 groups, 10-member experimental group and 10-member control group for sampling, to apply sensory integration training program developed in tactile, vestibular, vision, and auditory terms. In this study, pretest-posttest control group design was selected and for verification procedure, the result of pre-post testing of selective concentration and persistent concentration was processed through t-verification, to compare two groups. There was Superlab Pro 1.05 for measuring instrument to measure selective concentration and persistent concentration.
      The conclusions of this study are as follows.
      Firstly, sensory integration training was a program to improve selective concentration of mental retardation children. That is, mental retardation children receiving sensory integration training showed significant improvements of response rates in post-test after that.
      Secondly, sensory integration training did not show statistical difference but showed little difference in average response delay time of selective concentration of mental retardation children. That is, it could be said that single sensory integration training was not enough to reduce response delay time of selective concentration of mental retardation children.
      Thirdly, sensory integration training was not effective in response rates of persistent concentration of mental retardation children and response delay time. Since persistent concentration varied depending on study period and handicap condition, the study for it was required in the future.
      번역하기

      This study was aimed at revealing effects of sensory integration training program on improving concentration of mental retardation children. According to the goal of this study, 20 mental retardation children were divided into 2 groups, 10-member expe...

      This study was aimed at revealing effects of sensory integration training program on improving concentration of mental retardation children. According to the goal of this study, 20 mental retardation children were divided into 2 groups, 10-member experimental group and 10-member control group for sampling, to apply sensory integration training program developed in tactile, vestibular, vision, and auditory terms. In this study, pretest-posttest control group design was selected and for verification procedure, the result of pre-post testing of selective concentration and persistent concentration was processed through t-verification, to compare two groups. There was Superlab Pro 1.05 for measuring instrument to measure selective concentration and persistent concentration.
      The conclusions of this study are as follows.
      Firstly, sensory integration training was a program to improve selective concentration of mental retardation children. That is, mental retardation children receiving sensory integration training showed significant improvements of response rates in post-test after that.
      Secondly, sensory integration training did not show statistical difference but showed little difference in average response delay time of selective concentration of mental retardation children. That is, it could be said that single sensory integration training was not enough to reduce response delay time of selective concentration of mental retardation children.
      Thirdly, sensory integration training was not effective in response rates of persistent concentration of mental retardation children and response delay time. Since persistent concentration varied depending on study period and handicap condition, the study for it was required in the future.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 의의 = 1
      • 2. 연구 문제 = 4
      • 3. 용어의 정의 = 5
      • 목차
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 의의 = 1
      • 2. 연구 문제 = 4
      • 3. 용어의 정의 = 5
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 7
      • 1. 감각통합 = 7
      • 2. 정신지체 = 13
      • 3. 주의집중 = 22
      • Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 33
      • 1. 연구 대상 = 33
      • 2. 연구 설계 = 34
      • 3. 연구 절차 = 34
      • 4. 연구 도구 = 35
      • 5. 자료 처리 = 42
      • Ⅳ. 연구 결과 = 43
      • 1. 선택적 주의집중력에 미치는 효과 = 43
      • 2. 지속적 주의집중력에 미치는 효과 = 47
      • Ⅴ. 논의 = 52
      • 1. 방법의 논의 = 52
      • 2. 결과의 논의 = 55
      • Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 = 58
      • 1. 결론 = 58
      • 2. 제언 = 59
      • 참고문헌 = 60
      • Abstract = 66
      • 표목차
      • <표 Ⅲ-1> 연구 대상 아동 현황 = 33
      • <표 Ⅲ-2> 연구 설계 = 34
      • <표 Ⅲ-3> 감각 통합 훈련 프로그램 구성 내용 = 36
      • <표 Ⅲ-4> 감각통합훈련 내용 = 37
      • <표 Ⅲ-5> 프로그램 적용시간 = 38
      • <표 Ⅳ-1> 사전검사의 집단간 선택적 주의집중력 정반응률 = 43
      • <표 Ⅳ-2> 사후검사의 집단간 선택적 주의집중력 정반응률 = 44
      • <표 Ⅳ-3> 집단별 선택적 주의집중력 정반응률 = 45
      • <표 Ⅳ-4> 사전검사의 집단간 선택적 주의집중력 반응지연 시간 = 46
      • <표 Ⅳ-5> 사후검사의 집단간 선택적 주의집중력 반응지연 시간 = 46
      • <표 Ⅳ-6> 집단별 선택적 주의집중력 반응지연 시간 = 47
      • <표 Ⅳ-7> 사전검사의 집단간 지속적 주의집중력 정반응률 = 48
      • <표 Ⅳ-8> 사후검사의 집단간 지속적 주의집중력 정반응률 = 48
      • <표 Ⅳ-9> 집단별 지속적 주의집중력 정반응률 = 49
      • <표 Ⅳ-10> 사전검사의 집단간 지속적 주의집중력 반응지연 시간 = 50
      • <표 Ⅳ-11> 사후검사의 집단간 지속적 주의집중력 반응지연 시간 = 50
      • <표 Ⅳ-12> 집단별 지속적 주의집중력 반응지연 시간 = 51
      • 그림목차
      • <그림 Ⅱ-1> 감각통합의 수준별 표출 행동 = 11
      • <그림 Ⅲ-1> 선택적 주의집중력 측정화면 = 39
      • <그림 Ⅲ-2> 지속적 주의집중력 측정화면 = 41
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼