RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      주의집중력과 학업성적의 관계 = (The) Relationship between Attentiveness and Grades

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10062641

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study was designed to find out that students' attentiveness has an effect on grade by analysing the relationship between grades and attentional ability.
      The purpose of this study is (1) to find out the difference of a students' attentiveness depending on sex, (2) to find out the difference of students' attentiveness depending on their grades, and (3) to find out the difference of students' attentiveness depending on the career of the students' parents.
      In this study, a total of 697 girl and boy students in the eastern part of Jeonnam high schools were purposely sampled and asked to answer questionnaires. They were classified into three part(high, middle, low) by imitation college entrance exam.
      Dependent variables, which included attentiveness, were measured by TAIS(Test of Attentional Interpersonal Style) Robert M. Nideffer developed. TAIS consists of 3 positive items and 3 negative items.
      They were analyzed by SAS program. As a result, means and standard deviations were calculated to do the t-test and one-way ANOVA and three-way ANOVA.
      The results can be summarized as follows :
      First, in the factor of grades there was a difference between girls and boys.
      Second, in the factor of grade level there was a difference.
      Third, there was no difference in the factor of their parents' career.
      번역하기

      This study was designed to find out that students' attentiveness has an effect on grade by analysing the relationship between grades and attentional ability. The purpose of this study is (1) to find out the difference of a students' attentiveness dep...

      This study was designed to find out that students' attentiveness has an effect on grade by analysing the relationship between grades and attentional ability.
      The purpose of this study is (1) to find out the difference of a students' attentiveness depending on sex, (2) to find out the difference of students' attentiveness depending on their grades, and (3) to find out the difference of students' attentiveness depending on the career of the students' parents.
      In this study, a total of 697 girl and boy students in the eastern part of Jeonnam high schools were purposely sampled and asked to answer questionnaires. They were classified into three part(high, middle, low) by imitation college entrance exam.
      Dependent variables, which included attentiveness, were measured by TAIS(Test of Attentional Interpersonal Style) Robert M. Nideffer developed. TAIS consists of 3 positive items and 3 negative items.
      They were analyzed by SAS program. As a result, means and standard deviations were calculated to do the t-test and one-way ANOVA and three-way ANOVA.
      The results can be summarized as follows :
      First, in the factor of grades there was a difference between girls and boys.
      Second, in the factor of grade level there was a difference.
      Third, there was no difference in the factor of their parents' career.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차 = i
      • Abstract = iii
      • I. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 문제 = 3
      • 목차 = i
      • Abstract = iii
      • I. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 문제 = 3
      • 3. 연구의 가설 = 4
      • 4. 용어의 정의 = 4
      • 5. 연구의 제한점 = 5
      • II. 이론적 배경 = 6
      • 1. 주의의 개념 = 6
      • 2. 주의와 반응시간 = 8
      • 3. 주의 이론과 모델 = 12
      • 4. 주의에 영향을 주는 변인들 = 15
      • 5. 주의집중의 측정 = 18
      • III. 연구방법 = 21
      • 1. 연구대상 = 21
      • 2. 측정도구 = 22
      • 3. 자료처리 방법 = 23
      • IV. 연구결과 및 논의 = 24
      • 1. 연구결과 = 24
      • 2. 논의 = 31
      • V. 결론 = 35
      • 참고문헌 = 36
      • 설문지 = 42
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼