RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      학급목표구조가 목표지향성과 수학성취도에 미치는 효과 = (The) effects of classroom's goal structure on goal orientations and mathematics achievement

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10045445

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of classroom's goal structure on goal orientations and mathematics achievement. The study was largely divided into two parts. The purpose of study 1 was performed to test the prediction that there are three independent dimensions of goal orientations(mastery goal orientation, performance-approach goal orientation, performance-avoidance goal orientation), and to specify the relations between goal orientations(mastery goal orientation, performance-approach goal orientation, and performance-avoidance goal orientation) and motivational variables(perceived ability, persistence, and math anxiety). Two hundred seventy-eight sixth-grade Korean children(145 boys and 133 girls) from four elementary school in metropolitan city of Daegu participated in this study 1. The results of this study 1 were as follows : 1. Exploratory factor analysis with varimax rotation showed that three factor model provided a good fit to the theoretically determined subscale of the goal orientations scale. 2. Correlational analysis showed that performance-approach goal orientation was positively correlated with both mastery goal orientation and performance-avoidance goal orientation, but mastery goal orientation was not significantly correlated to performance-avoidance goal orientation. 3. Canonical correlational analysis showed that variance of motivational variables(perceived ability, persistence, and math anxiety) were explained about 45% by goal orientations(mastery goal orientation, performance-approach goal orientation, and performance-avoidance goal orientation) The primary purpose of experimental study 2 was to investigate the effects of classroom's goal structures[Mastery Goal Structure(MGS), Performance-approach Goal Structure(PPGS), and Performance-avoidance Goal Structure(PVGS)] on goal orientations (mastery goal orientation, performance-approach goal orientation, performance-avoidance goal orientation) and mathematics achievement in mathematics environments. One hundred two sixth-grade Korean children(54 boys and 48 girls) from an elementary school in metropolitan city of Daegu participated in this experiment. Students were assigned to one of the 3 classroom goal structure conditions. The results of this experimental study 2 were as follows: Results showed the significance of classroom's goal structure effects on mastery goal orientation and mathematics achievement. 1. The MGS was significantly more effective on mastery goal orientation than the PVGS. However there was no significance between the PPGS and the MGS, and no significance between the PPGS and the PVGS. 2. The MGS was significantly more effective on mathematics achievement than the PVGS. However there was no significance between the PPGS and the MGS, and no significance between the PPGS and the PVGS. These results suggest that educators should develop a mastery goal climate in their teaching contexts, which means to stress the importance of understanding, the process of thinking, monitoring the learner's progress, learning for its own sake, and cooperative learning rather than stressing only the outcomes in the mathematics learning environment.

      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of classroom's goal structure on goal orientations and mathematics achievement. The study was largely divided into two parts. The purpose of study 1 was performed to test the prediction that the...

      The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of classroom's goal structure on goal orientations and mathematics achievement. The study was largely divided into two parts. The purpose of study 1 was performed to test the prediction that there are three independent dimensions of goal orientations(mastery goal orientation, performance-approach goal orientation, performance-avoidance goal orientation), and to specify the relations between goal orientations(mastery goal orientation, performance-approach goal orientation, and performance-avoidance goal orientation) and motivational variables(perceived ability, persistence, and math anxiety). Two hundred seventy-eight sixth-grade Korean children(145 boys and 133 girls) from four elementary school in metropolitan city of Daegu participated in this study 1. The results of this study 1 were as follows : 1. Exploratory factor analysis with varimax rotation showed that three factor model provided a good fit to the theoretically determined subscale of the goal orientations scale. 2. Correlational analysis showed that performance-approach goal orientation was positively correlated with both mastery goal orientation and performance-avoidance goal orientation, but mastery goal orientation was not significantly correlated to performance-avoidance goal orientation. 3. Canonical correlational analysis showed that variance of motivational variables(perceived ability, persistence, and math anxiety) were explained about 45% by goal orientations(mastery goal orientation, performance-approach goal orientation, and performance-avoidance goal orientation) The primary purpose of experimental study 2 was to investigate the effects of classroom's goal structures[Mastery Goal Structure(MGS), Performance-approach Goal Structure(PPGS), and Performance-avoidance Goal Structure(PVGS)] on goal orientations (mastery goal orientation, performance-approach goal orientation, performance-avoidance goal orientation) and mathematics achievement in mathematics environments. One hundred two sixth-grade Korean children(54 boys and 48 girls) from an elementary school in metropolitan city of Daegu participated in this experiment. Students were assigned to one of the 3 classroom goal structure conditions. The results of this experimental study 2 were as follows: Results showed the significance of classroom's goal structure effects on mastery goal orientation and mathematics achievement. 1. The MGS was significantly more effective on mastery goal orientation than the PVGS. However there was no significance between the PPGS and the MGS, and no significance between the PPGS and the PVGS. 2. The MGS was significantly more effective on mathematics achievement than the PVGS. However there was no significance between the PPGS and the MGS, and no significance between the PPGS and the PVGS. These results suggest that educators should develop a mastery goal climate in their teaching contexts, which means to stress the importance of understanding, the process of thinking, monitoring the learner's progress, learning for its own sake, and cooperative learning rather than stressing only the outcomes in the mathematics learning environment.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차 = i
      • <표 차례> = iv
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • Ⅱ. 연구 1: 목표지향성과 동기적 변인의 관계 = 6
      • 1. 문제의 진술 = 6
      • 목차 = i
      • <표 차례> = iv
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • Ⅱ. 연구 1: 목표지향성과 동기적 변인의 관계 = 6
      • 1. 문제의 진술 = 6
      • 2. 용어의 정의 = 8
      • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 9
      • 4. 이론적 배경 = 10
      • 가. 목표지향성의 하위유형 = 10
      • 나. 목표지향성 하위유형간의 관계 = 12
      • 다. 목표지향성과 동기적 변인의 관계 = 13
      • 5. 연구가설 = 20
      • 6. 연구방법 = 21
      • 가. 연구대상 = 21
      • 나. 측정도구 = 21
      • 다. 자료수집 = 24
      • 라. 자료분석 = 24
      • 7. 연구결과 = 25
      • 가. 목표지향성의 요인구조 = 25
      • 나. 목표지향성 하위유형간의 상관 = 26
      • 다. 목표지향성과 동기적 변인의 관계 = 27
      • 8. 논의 = 29
      • Ⅲ. 연구 2: 학급목표구조가 목표지향성과 수학성취도에 미치는 효과 = 32
      • 1. 문제의 진술 = 32
      • 2. 용어의 정의 = 34
      • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 35
      • 4. 이론적 배경 = 36
      • 가. 학급목표구조와 목표지향성의 관계 = 36
      • 나. 학급목표구조와 학업성취의 관계 = 40
      • 5. 연구가설 = 42
      • 6. 연구방법 = 42
      • 가. 연구대상 = 42
      • 나. 측정도구 = 42
      • 다. 실험설계 = 44
      • 라. 실험절차 = 44
      • 마. 자료분석 = 55
      • 7. 연구결과 = 56
      • 가. 학급목표구조가 목표지향성에 미치는 효과 = 56
      • 나. 학급목표구조가 수학성취도에 미치는 효과 = 58
      • 8. 논의 = 59
      • Ⅳ. 종합논의 = 62
      • Ⅴ. 결론 = 66
      • 참고문헌 = 67
      • Abstract = 79
      • 부록 = 81
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼