RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    TPP에서의 지적재산권에 관한 고찰

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101888429

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper analyzes The Trans-Pacific Partnership(TPP) IP provisions and suggests the negotiation strategy. The TPP, also known as the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement, is a trade agreement currently under negotiation that has its roots in an existing agreement between Brunei, Chile, New Zealand, and Singapore. The original agreement between the countries of Brunei, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore(P4) was signed on June 3, 2005. The TPP could be as one of the most promising region building efforts in the Pacific region. U.S. negotiators and others describe and envision the TPP as a “comprehensive and high-standard” FTA that aims to liberalize trade in nearly all goods and services and include commitments beyond those currently established in the World Trade Organization(WTO). However, there are a number of issues that must be resolved before an expanded TPP could become a reality. These issues comprise substantive obstacles in the negotiating process as well as procedural hurdles that must be addressed once an agreement is reached. PTAs, especially those with the U.S., often include provisions for enhanced intellectual property protection, going beyond the WTO TRIPS agreement’s requirements: so-called ―TRIPS-Plus. Typically TRIPS-Plus refers to IPR provisions believed to contain additional requirements than those contained in the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (“TRIPS”), which is administered by the WTO. The P4 also imposes TRIPS plus obligations, although they are not as extensive as those found in U.S. FTAs. TPP contained TRIPS plus provisions that can undermine the flexibilities and disturb the delicate balance provided by the TRIPS Agreement.
    번역하기

    This paper analyzes The Trans-Pacific Partnership(TPP) IP provisions and suggests the negotiation strategy. The TPP, also known as the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement, is a trade agreement currently under negotiation that has it...

    This paper analyzes The Trans-Pacific Partnership(TPP) IP provisions and suggests the negotiation strategy. The TPP, also known as the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement, is a trade agreement currently under negotiation that has its roots in an existing agreement between Brunei, Chile, New Zealand, and Singapore. The original agreement between the countries of Brunei, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore(P4) was signed on June 3, 2005. The TPP could be as one of the most promising region building efforts in the Pacific region. U.S. negotiators and others describe and envision the TPP as a “comprehensive and high-standard” FTA that aims to liberalize trade in nearly all goods and services and include commitments beyond those currently established in the World Trade Organization(WTO). However, there are a number of issues that must be resolved before an expanded TPP could become a reality. These issues comprise substantive obstacles in the negotiating process as well as procedural hurdles that must be addressed once an agreement is reached. PTAs, especially those with the U.S., often include provisions for enhanced intellectual property protection, going beyond the WTO TRIPS agreement’s requirements: so-called ―TRIPS-Plus. Typically TRIPS-Plus refers to IPR provisions believed to contain additional requirements than those contained in the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (“TRIPS”), which is administered by the WTO. The P4 also imposes TRIPS plus obligations, although they are not as extensive as those found in U.S. FTAs. TPP contained TRIPS plus provisions that can undermine the flexibilities and disturb the delicate balance provided by the TRIPS Agreement.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 처음에
    • II. TPP에서의 지적재산권 논의의 위상
    • 1. TPP의 세계경제에서의 역할
    • 2. 경제통합으로서의 FTA와 TPP
    • III. TPP에서의 지적재산권 쟁점
    • I. 처음에
    • II. TPP에서의 지적재산권 논의의 위상
    • 1. TPP의 세계경제에서의 역할
    • 2. 경제통합으로서의 FTA와 TPP
    • III. TPP에서의 지적재산권 쟁점
    • 1. 산업재산권(특허법ㆍ상표법) 관련 쟁점
    • 2. 저작권 관련 쟁점
    • 2. 손해배상 등 관련 쟁점
    • IV. 우리나라의 지적재산권 보호수준과 TPP에서의 협상전략
    • 1. 한ㆍ 미 FTA에서의 지적재산권 보호수준 강화
    • 2. FTA 협상전략과 TPP 협상전략
    • V. 맺음말
    • 참고문헌
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 福井健策, "「ネットの自由」vs.著作權-TPPは. 終わりの始まりなのか-" 光文社 2012

    2 윤선희, "현행 상표법상의 상표와 국내에 도입되지 않은 상표" 한남대학교 과학기술법연구소 4 : 1998

    3 윤선희, "새로운 상표제도에 관한 연구" 한국산업재산권법학회 (8) : 1999

    4 윤선희, "상표법(제2판)" 법문사 2014

    5 "韓米FTAにともなう知的財産権に関する法律の主な改正内容"

    6 張濬暎, "韓國․ 米國間の自由貿易協定における知的財産權條項" 52 (52): 2007

    7 西口博之, "醫療關聯行爲の特許とその保護-特許法改正問題との關聯において-" 8 (8): 2009

    8 奧田聰, "通商政策の潮流と日本:FTAとTPP" 勁草書房 2012

    9 石川幸一, "通商政策の潮流と日本:FTAとTPP" 勁草書房 2012

    10 山澤逸平, "通商政策の潮流と日本: FTAとTPP" 勁草書房 2012

    1 福井健策, "「ネットの自由」vs.著作權-TPPは. 終わりの始まりなのか-" 光文社 2012

    2 윤선희, "현행 상표법상의 상표와 국내에 도입되지 않은 상표" 한남대학교 과학기술법연구소 4 : 1998

    3 윤선희, "새로운 상표제도에 관한 연구" 한국산업재산권법학회 (8) : 1999

    4 윤선희, "상표법(제2판)" 법문사 2014

    5 "韓米FTAにともなう知的財産権に関する法律の主な改正内容"

    6 張濬暎, "韓國․ 米國間の自由貿易協定における知的財産權條項" 52 (52): 2007

    7 西口博之, "醫療關聯行爲の特許とその保護-特許法改正問題との關聯において-" 8 (8): 2009

    8 奧田聰, "通商政策の潮流と日本:FTAとTPP" 勁草書房 2012

    9 石川幸一, "通商政策の潮流と日本:FTAとTPP" 勁草書房 2012

    10 山澤逸平, "通商政策の潮流と日本: FTAとTPP" 勁草書房 2012

    11 馬田啓一, "米國のTPP戰略と日本の對應" (85) : 2011

    12 澁谷達紀, "知的財産法講義Ⅲ(第2版)" 有斐閣 2008

    13 西田博之, "知的財産權とTPP" 216 : 2013

    14 石川幸一, "環太平洋戰略的經濟漣携協定(TPP)の槪要と意義" (81) : 2010

    15 張濬暎, "最近の韓國著作權法改正とその後" 2013

    16 馬田啓一, "日本のTPP戰略-課題と展望-" 文眞堂 2012

    17 石川幸一, "日本のTPP戰略-課題と展望-" 文眞堂 2012

    18 中島明義, "日本のTPP戰略-課題と展望-" 文眞堂 2012

    19 石川幸一, "日本のFTAとTPP" (88) : 2012

    20 鈴木將文, "新しい形態の商標の保護" (31) : 2008

    21 石川幸一, "新しい協定となるTPP" (84) : 2011

    22 財団法人 知的財産研究所, "新しいタイプの商標に關する調査硏究報告書" 2008

    23 福井健策, "文藝春秋オピニオン2013年の論点100" 文春MOOK 2013

    24 鈴木將文, "地域貿易協定(RTAs)における知的財産條項の評價と展望" 2008

    25 平尾正樹, "商標法" 學陽書房 2002

    26 "http://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/08j005.pdf"

    27 "http://www.customs.go.kr/kcshome/main/content/ContentView.do?contentId=CONTENT_ID_000002801&layoutMenuNo=30710"

    28 "http://www.customs.go.kr/kcshome/main/content/ContentView.do;jsessionid=xypmTKJHj7Jd21Qp90CQNhJ4W3SpnnRThnY29Sm3FwG83VpSfJmv!649052305?contentId=CONTENT_ID_000002800&layoutMenuNo=30709"

    29 "http://www.customs.go.kr/kcshome/main/content/ContentView.do;jsessionid=hhmfTL8PdkhLnD6V3Q6fqxFCJBfLgZjy2zhLHJWdKd951zhwVvzT!649052305?contentId=CONTENT_ID_000002801&layoutMenuNo=30710#none"

    30 "http://www.customs.go.kr/download/ftaportalkor/_down/trty/han_mi_1_04.pdf"

    31 "http://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=930069&cid=518&categoryId=518"

    32 "http://news.heraldcorp.com/view.php?ud=20140225000055&md=20140225104521_BC"

    33 "http://economy.hankooki.com/lpage/worldecono/201402/e2014022317465069760.htm"

    34 Shayerah Ilias, "United States Congressional Research Service" RL34292 : 2011

    35 국제무역연구원, "Trade Brief" 한국무역협회 2013

    36 UNAIDS, "The Potential Impact of Free Trade Agreement of Public Health" 2012

    37 이인혜, "TPP개관 및 지식재산권 주요 이슈" 한국지식재산연구원 2013

    38 石川幸一, "TPP交涉の論点と米國などの姿勢" (92) : 2013

    39 鈴木將文, "TPPにおける知的財産条項" (1443) : 2012

    40 高安雄一, "TPPと日本の決斷「決められない政治」からの脫却-" 文眞堂 2013

    41 中川淳司, "TPPで日本はどう變わゐか?" 2011

    42 William Cornish, "Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyrights, Trade Marks and Allied Rights" Sweet & Maxwell 2010

    43 박덕영, "GLOBAL IP TREND2013" 한국지식재산연구원 2013

    44 한국지식재산연구원, "GLOBAL IP TREND 2013" 한국지식재산연구원 2013

    45 經濟産業省 通商政策局, "2012年版不公正貿易去來報告書" 2012

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2014-08-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국산업재산권법학회 -> 한국지식재산학회
    영문명 : Korea Industrial Property Law Association -> Korea Intellectual Property Society
    KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-03-11 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국산업재산권법학회a -> 한국산업재산권법학회 KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-07-31 학술지등록 한글명 : 산업재산권
    외국어명 : Journal of Industrial Property
    KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.81 0.81 0.71
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.7 0.69 0.759 0.12
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼