RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    투자권유준칙 상의 투자자 위험수용성향 평가척도의 검토 = Testing the Reliability and Validity of the Financial Risk Tolerance Scale of the Investment Advice Guideline

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100768663

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examined the reliability and validity of the risk tolerance scale suggested by the Standardized Guidelines for the Professional Investment Advice which is effectively used in the financial institutions in Korea in the process of professional financial advice to financial consumers. Data from the 300 Korean adults whose age was between 20s and 50s were used for the analysis. The major results were as follows: First, the factor analysis on the risk tolerance scale identified the two dimensions of the risk tolerance, which were financial capability and earnings capacity. Second, the overall reliability of the risk tolerance scale was low (Cronbach α=0.47) as indicated by the Cronbach α value which was estimated by 0.47. The reliability of the financial capability sub-dimension was higher than the reliability of the whole scale, of which the Cronbach α was estimated by 0.61. Third, the results of the validity tests indicated that the financial risk tolerance scale overestimated the level of financial risk tolerance compared to the risk aversion rate and to the level of investment experience on the risky assets. Moreover the financial risk tolerance scale did not discerned the higher levels of risk tolerance by failing to distinguish between the level 4 and the level 5. However financial capability sub- dimension demonstrated a significant association with the risk aversion rate and the level of investment experience on risky assets. These results suggested that, first, excluding the earnings capacity and adding the psychological aspects of the financial risk tolerance could improve the validity and reliability of the scale; and second, earnings capacity needs to be treated as the financial risk acceptance capability rather than financial risk tolerance.
    번역하기

    This study examined the reliability and validity of the risk tolerance scale suggested by the Standardized Guidelines for the Professional Investment Advice which is effectively used in the financial institutions in Korea in the process of professiona...

    This study examined the reliability and validity of the risk tolerance scale suggested by the Standardized Guidelines for the Professional Investment Advice which is effectively used in the financial institutions in Korea in the process of professional financial advice to financial consumers. Data from the 300 Korean adults whose age was between 20s and 50s were used for the analysis. The major results were as follows: First, the factor analysis on the risk tolerance scale identified the two dimensions of the risk tolerance, which were financial capability and earnings capacity. Second, the overall reliability of the risk tolerance scale was low (Cronbach α=0.47) as indicated by the Cronbach α value which was estimated by 0.47. The reliability of the financial capability sub-dimension was higher than the reliability of the whole scale, of which the Cronbach α was estimated by 0.61. Third, the results of the validity tests indicated that the financial risk tolerance scale overestimated the level of financial risk tolerance compared to the risk aversion rate and to the level of investment experience on the risky assets. Moreover the financial risk tolerance scale did not discerned the higher levels of risk tolerance by failing to distinguish between the level 4 and the level 5. However financial capability sub- dimension demonstrated a significant association with the risk aversion rate and the level of investment experience on risky assets. These results suggested that, first, excluding the earnings capacity and adding the psychological aspects of the financial risk tolerance could improve the validity and reliability of the scale; and second, earnings capacity needs to be treated as the financial risk acceptance capability rather than financial risk tolerance.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 한국금융투자협회, "투자권유준칙"

    2 정순희, "재무위험수용성향과 위험자산보유율관련변수에관한연구" 4 (4): 1-20, 2011

    3 한국FPSP, "재무설계원론" 한국FPSP 2011

    4 허경옥, "소비자의 위험감수도와 현상유지도가 재무정보탐색, 가계재무관리행동 및 경제생활만족도에 미치는 영향" 한국FP학회 6 (6): 1-25, 2013

    5 장연주, "금융소비자의 재무위험감수성향 영향요인 연구" 5 (5): 35-65, 2012

    6 허경옥, "가계투자에서의 위험감수성향 판별변수조사 및 위험감수성향에 따른 가계재무관리 특성 분석" 5 (5): 133-159, 2012

    7 FINRA(Financial Industry Regulatory Authority), "Suitability: What Investors Need to Know"

    8 SAS Institute Inc., "SAS/STAT User’s Guide Version 6, Fourth Edition, Volumn 2" SAS Institute Inc 1989

    9 Injodey, J. I., "Risk Tolerance of Investors : Developing a Psychometric Tool" 2 (2): 57-73, 2011

    10 Cordell, D. M, "Risk Tolerance in Two Dimensions" 15 (15): 30-36, 2002

    1 한국금융투자협회, "투자권유준칙"

    2 정순희, "재무위험수용성향과 위험자산보유율관련변수에관한연구" 4 (4): 1-20, 2011

    3 한국FPSP, "재무설계원론" 한국FPSP 2011

    4 허경옥, "소비자의 위험감수도와 현상유지도가 재무정보탐색, 가계재무관리행동 및 경제생활만족도에 미치는 영향" 한국FP학회 6 (6): 1-25, 2013

    5 장연주, "금융소비자의 재무위험감수성향 영향요인 연구" 5 (5): 35-65, 2012

    6 허경옥, "가계투자에서의 위험감수성향 판별변수조사 및 위험감수성향에 따른 가계재무관리 특성 분석" 5 (5): 133-159, 2012

    7 FINRA(Financial Industry Regulatory Authority), "Suitability: What Investors Need to Know"

    8 SAS Institute Inc., "SAS/STAT User’s Guide Version 6, Fourth Edition, Volumn 2" SAS Institute Inc 1989

    9 Injodey, J. I., "Risk Tolerance of Investors : Developing a Psychometric Tool" 2 (2): 57-73, 2011

    10 Cordell, D. M, "Risk Tolerance in Two Dimensions" 15 (15): 30-36, 2002

    11 Roszkowski, M. J., "Risk Perception and Risk Tolerance Changes Attributable to the 2008 Economic Crisis: A Subtle but Critical Difference" 2010 (2010): 42-53, 2010

    12 OECD NIFE, "Measuring Financial Literacy:Questionnaire and Guidance Notes for Conducting an Internationally Comparable Survey of Financial Literacy" OECD 2011

    13 Roszkowski, M. J., "Intraperson consistency in financial risk tolerance assessment : Temporal stability, relationship to total score, and effect on criterion-related validity" 24 (24): 455-467, 2009

    14 Grable, J., "Financial risk tolerance revisited : the development of a risk assessment instrument" 16 : 163-181, 1999

    15 Roszkowski, M. J., "Estimating Risk Tolerance : The Degree of Accuracy and the Paramorphic Representations of the Estimate" 16 (16): 29-47, 2005

    16 Bodie, Z., "Essentials of Investments" McGrow Hill International Edition 2007

    17 Grable, J. E., "Environmental and Biopsychosocial Factors Associated with Financial Risk Tolerance" 15 (15): 73-82, 2004

    18 Lee, P, "Does Your Risk Tolerance Match Your Risk Capacity? What Is the Difference?"

    19 Corter, J. E., "Do investment risk tolerance attitudes predict portfolio risk?" 2 (2): 369-381, 2006

    20 European Credit Research Institute, "Consumer Financial Capability : Empowering European Consumers" European Credit Research Institute 2006

    21 Farrelly, G., "Assessing Risk Tolerance Levels : A Prerequisite to Personalizing and Managing Portfolios" 45 (45): 14-16, 1989

    22 Faff, Robert W., "An Empirical Investigation of Personal Financial Risk Tolerance" 13 : 57-78, 2004

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.48 1.48 1.67
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.7 1.88 2.351 0.15
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼