RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    여성주의적 배려윤리의 도덕교육적 의미와 가능성 = An Inquiry of the Possibility of Moral Education Based on the Feminist Care Ethics

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99898676

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to analyze justice ethics, feminine care ethics and feminist care ethics of moral education. Through this study, it has examined the possibility of feminist care ethics of moral education. To accomplish the purpose of this study, feminine care ethics and feminist care ethics in moral education have been examined and provided by each theory has been discussed. Feminist care ethics of mroal education suggests to understand differences and commonality, educational relations and communication. The body of this paper is outlined as follows: Justice ethics of moral education are examined with differences and commonality, educational realtions and communication. Feminine care ethics of moral education are examined with differences and commonality, educational realtions and communication. The ethical practices of care ethics of moral education is criticized through feminist care ethics with differences and commonality, educational relations and communication. The research concludes with some of the implications that feminist care ethics can offer to the moral education in understanding difference, educational relation and communication. For instance, feminist care ethics of moral education argues for the universalizability of balances between differences and commonality. This perspective has implications to respect individual differences and unify specific differences in applications moral education theories and practices. Furthermore, feminist care ethics of moral education indicates that the relationship between teacher and student shoud be reciprocal in the context of balancing care and reason. Feminist care ethics of moral education also suggests that the communication attitudes toward differences should include openness, negativity, and reflection in the context of balancing care and reasoning. Additionally, it increases the universalizability of agreement in different conversations. In conclusion, this study intends to demonstrate how feminist care ethics can offer us a powerful way to reconceive the paradigmatic shift in current moral educational theroy and to allow us to move towards a more justice and caring society.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to analyze justice ethics, feminine care ethics and feminist care ethics of moral education. Through this study, it has examined the possibility of feminist care ethics of moral education. To accomplish the purpose of this...

    The purpose of this study is to analyze justice ethics, feminine care ethics and feminist care ethics of moral education. Through this study, it has examined the possibility of feminist care ethics of moral education. To accomplish the purpose of this study, feminine care ethics and feminist care ethics in moral education have been examined and provided by each theory has been discussed. Feminist care ethics of mroal education suggests to understand differences and commonality, educational relations and communication. The body of this paper is outlined as follows: Justice ethics of moral education are examined with differences and commonality, educational realtions and communication. Feminine care ethics of moral education are examined with differences and commonality, educational realtions and communication. The ethical practices of care ethics of moral education is criticized through feminist care ethics with differences and commonality, educational relations and communication. The research concludes with some of the implications that feminist care ethics can offer to the moral education in understanding difference, educational relation and communication. For instance, feminist care ethics of moral education argues for the universalizability of balances between differences and commonality. This perspective has implications to respect individual differences and unify specific differences in applications moral education theories and practices. Furthermore, feminist care ethics of moral education indicates that the relationship between teacher and student shoud be reciprocal in the context of balancing care and reason. Feminist care ethics of moral education also suggests that the communication attitudes toward differences should include openness, negativity, and reflection in the context of balancing care and reasoning. Additionally, it increases the universalizability of agreement in different conversations. In conclusion, this study intends to demonstrate how feminist care ethics can offer us a powerful way to reconceive the paradigmatic shift in current moral educational theroy and to allow us to move towards a more justice and caring society.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 허란주, "정의의 입장에 대한 페미니즘의 도전: 도덕적 성숙에 대한 논쟁, In 사회철학대계 3" 민음사 328-351, 1993

    2 곽삼근, "여성주의 교육학" 이화여자대학교 출판부 2010

    3 박병춘, "보살핌윤리(An ethic of care)의 도덕교육적 접근 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 1999

    4 김수동, "배려의 교육" 장서원 2005

    5 박병춘, "배려윤리와 도덕교육" 울력 2002

    6 Noddings, N., "배려교육론" 다른우리 2002

    7 Kohlberg, L., "도덕발달의 철학 : 도덕단계와 정의의 관념" 교학사 2004

    8 Martin, J. R., "교육적 인간상과 여성" 학지사 2002

    9 Tronto, J. C., "Toward a Feminist Theory of Care, In Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Lives" State University of New York Press 35-62, 1991

    10 Martin, J. R., "The School Home : Rethinking Schools for Changing Families" Harvard University Press 1992

    1 허란주, "정의의 입장에 대한 페미니즘의 도전: 도덕적 성숙에 대한 논쟁, In 사회철학대계 3" 민음사 328-351, 1993

    2 곽삼근, "여성주의 교육학" 이화여자대학교 출판부 2010

    3 박병춘, "보살핌윤리(An ethic of care)의 도덕교육적 접근 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 1999

    4 김수동, "배려의 교육" 장서원 2005

    5 박병춘, "배려윤리와 도덕교육" 울력 2002

    6 Noddings, N., "배려교육론" 다른우리 2002

    7 Kohlberg, L., "도덕발달의 철학 : 도덕단계와 정의의 관념" 교학사 2004

    8 Martin, J. R., "교육적 인간상과 여성" 학지사 2002

    9 Tronto, J. C., "Toward a Feminist Theory of Care, In Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Lives" State University of New York Press 35-62, 1991

    10 Martin, J. R., "The School Home : Rethinking Schools for Changing Families" Harvard University Press 1992

    11 Benhabib, S., "The Generalized and the Concrete Other: The Kohlberg-Gilligan Controversy and Feminist Theory, In Feminism and Critique" University of Minnesota Press 77-95, 1987

    12 Noddings, N., "Starting at Home: Caring and Social Policy" University of California Press 2002

    13 Koehn, D., "Rethinking Feminist Ethics: Care, Trust, and Empathy" Routledge 1998

    14 Burbules, N., "Reasonable Doubt: Toward a Postmodern Defense of Reason as an Educational Aim, In Conversations in Philosophy of Education" Routledge 82-102, 1995

    15 Habermas, W., "Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action" The MIT Press 1990

    16 Tronto, J. C., "Moral Boundaries: A Political Arguement for a Ethic of Care" Routledge 1994

    17 Young, I. M., "Justice, and the Politics of difference" Princeton University Press 1990

    18 Gilligan, C., "In a Different Voice : Psychological Theory and Women’s Development" Harvard University Press 1982

    19 Jaggar, A. M., "Feminist Ethics: Problems, Projects, Prospects, In Feminist Ethics" University of Kansas 78-104, 1990

    20 Tong, R., "Feminine and Feminist Ethics" Wadsworth Publishing 1993

    21 Noddings, N., "Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education" University of California Press 1984

    22 Jaggar, A. M., "Caring as Feminist Practice of Moral Reason, In Justice and Care: Essential Readings in Feminist Ethics" Westview Press 179-202, 1995

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-03-29 학술지명변경 한글명 : 교육철학 -> 교육철학연구 KCI등재
    2011-03-22 학회명변경 한글명 : 교육철학회 -> 한국교육철학학회
    영문명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Philosophy of Education Society
    KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-05-30 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Philosophy of Education Society -> The Korean Journal of Philosophy of Education KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.75 0.75 0.86
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.84 0.88 1.27 0.33
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼