RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      입학사정관전형 교사추천서 작성실태 분석 = Reality of recommendation letters written by teachers for admissions officer system

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99884000

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The current study aimed to observe the reality of teachers` recommendation letters to retain the validity and the reliability of teachers` recommendation as an evaluation material. Surveys from 459 teachers who wrote recommendation letters for the 2013 early decision admissions officers screening to Kyung-Hee University were analyzed. The analysis showed the following results. First, students requested recommendation letter 1 month before application period the most (50%); teachers spent 8 hours on average in writing recommendation letters (53%); and the students` personality were the biggest factor in writing recommendation letters (93%). Second, 92% of teachers evaluated the students objectively (92%) and 51% of the teachers believed that the university does not receive recommendation letters as a formality, showing that teachers trust and evaluate recommendation letters as objective. Third, 41% of teachers believed that the screening result of the recommended student were different from expectation, showing some difference in teachers` evaluation and the university`s evaluation of the students. Fourth, for improvement: 1) basic pressure on recommendation letter, 2) request for objective index and length of recommendation letter, 3) clarity on the actual application rate of the recommendation letters were suggested. Finally, the limitations and implications of the current study were discussed, and directions for future studies were also suggested.
      번역하기

      The current study aimed to observe the reality of teachers` recommendation letters to retain the validity and the reliability of teachers` recommendation as an evaluation material. Surveys from 459 teachers who wrote recommendation letters for the 201...

      The current study aimed to observe the reality of teachers` recommendation letters to retain the validity and the reliability of teachers` recommendation as an evaluation material. Surveys from 459 teachers who wrote recommendation letters for the 2013 early decision admissions officers screening to Kyung-Hee University were analyzed. The analysis showed the following results. First, students requested recommendation letter 1 month before application period the most (50%); teachers spent 8 hours on average in writing recommendation letters (53%); and the students` personality were the biggest factor in writing recommendation letters (93%). Second, 92% of teachers evaluated the students objectively (92%) and 51% of the teachers believed that the university does not receive recommendation letters as a formality, showing that teachers trust and evaluate recommendation letters as objective. Third, 41% of teachers believed that the screening result of the recommended student were different from expectation, showing some difference in teachers` evaluation and the university`s evaluation of the students. Fourth, for improvement: 1) basic pressure on recommendation letter, 2) request for objective index and length of recommendation letter, 3) clarity on the actual application rate of the recommendation letters were suggested. Finally, the limitations and implications of the current study were discussed, and directions for future studies were also suggested.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼